Effects of treatment-induced mortality and tumor-induced mortality on tests for carcinogenicity in small samples.

Statistical tests of carcinogenicity are shown to have varying degrees of robustness to the effects of mortality. Mortality induced by two different mechanisms is studied--mortality due to the tumor of interest, and mortality due to treatment independent of the tumor. The two most commonly used tests, the life-table test and the Cochran-Armitage linear trend test, are seen to be highly sensitive to increases in treatment lethality using small-sample simulations. Increases in tumor lethality are seen to affect the performance of commonly used prevalence tests such as logistic regression. A simple survival-adjusted quantal response test appears to be the most robust of all the procedures considered.

[1]  J J Gart,et al.  Statistical issues in interpretation of chronic bioassay tests for carcinogenicity. , 1979, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[2]  D G Hoel,et al.  Statistical analysis of survival experiments. , 1972, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[3]  Tests of hypotheses about the parameters of the logistic function , 1966 .

[4]  D G Hoel,et al.  Age-specific models of mortality and tumor onset for historical control animals in the National Toxicology Program's carcinogenicity experiments. , 1986, Cancer research.

[5]  C J Portier,et al.  Semiparametric analysis of tumor incidence rates in survival/sacrifice experiments. , 1987, Biometrics.

[6]  R. Tarone,et al.  Tests for trend in life table analysis , 1975 .

[7]  J D Kalbfleisch,et al.  Nonparametric methods for survival/sacrifice experiments. , 1986, Biometrics.

[8]  D. Krewski,et al.  Statistical Methods in Cancer Research: Volume III: The Design and Analysis of Long-Term Animal Experiments , 1987 .

[9]  Barbara McKnight,et al.  Tests for differences in tumor incidence based on animal carcinogenesis experiments , 1984 .

[10]  N. Mantel.  Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration. , 1966, Cancer chemotherapy reports.

[11]  D. Freedman.  The General Case , 2022, Frameworks, Tensegrities, and Symmetry.

[12]  J Wahrendorf,et al.  Guidelines for simple, sensitive significance tests for carcinogenic effects in long-term animal experiments. , 1980, IARC monographs on the evaluation of the carcinogenic risk of chemicals to humans. Supplement.

[13]  M. W. Birch.  The Detection of Partial Association, Ii: The General Case , 1965 .