Enhancing Fraction Predicts Clinical Outcome following First-Line Chemotherapy in Patients with Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma

Purpose: To define a simple radiologic biomarker of prognosis in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma on first-line chemotherapy. Experimental Design: Twenty-seven patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy with >2 cm residual disease [International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages IIIC or IV] after surgery were identified. The proportion of enhancing tumor tissue—the enhancing fraction—was calculated on pre-chemotherapy computed tomography scans at four Hounsfield unit (HU) thresholds and assessed for correlation with CA125 response, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) radiologic response, and time to progression. Discriminative power was assessed by leave-one-out discriminant analysis. Results: Pre-chemotherapy residual tumor volume did not correlate with clinical outcome. Pre-chemotherapy enhancing fraction at all thresholds significantly correlated with CA125 response (P < 0.001, ρ = 0.553 for 50 HU; P < 0.001, ρ = 0.565 for 60 HU; P < 0.001, ρ = 0.553 for 70 HU; P = 0.001, ρ = 0.516 for 80 HU). Significant correlations were also shown for radiologic response at all thresholds. Enhancing fraction predicted CA125 response with 81.9% to 86.4% specificity and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors response with 74.9% to 76.8% specificity at 95% sensitivity (dependent on threshold). Enhancing fraction correlated with time to progression at the 60 HU (P = 0.045, ρ = 0.336) and 70 HU (P = 0.042; ρ = 0.340) thresholds. Conclusion: Pre-chemotherapy enhancing fraction is a simple quantitative radiologic measure. Further evaluation in larger trials is required to confirm the potential of enhancing fraction as a predictive factor, particularly for patients who may benefit from the addition of antiangiogenic therapy.

[1]  Geoff J M Parker,et al.  Imaging Tumor Vascular Heterogeneity and Angiogenesis using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[2]  Robert A. Beckman,et al.  Phase I Evaluation of a Fully Human Anti–αv Integrin Monoclonal Antibody (CNTO 95) in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[3]  G. Parker,et al.  DCE-MRI biomarkers in the clinical evaluation of antiangiogenic and vascular disrupting agents , 2007, British Journal of Cancer.

[4]  Tracy T Batchelor,et al.  AZD2171, a pan-VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, normalizes tumor vasculature and alleviates edema in glioblastoma patients. , 2007, Cancer cell.

[5]  Geoff J M Parker,et al.  Comparison of the performance of tracer kinetic model-driven registration for dynamic contrast enhanced MRI using different models of contrast enhancement. , 2006, Academic radiology.

[6]  Paul Workman,et al.  Minimally invasive pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic technologies in hypothesis-testing clinical trials of innovative therapies. , 2006, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[7]  Geoff J M Parker,et al.  Is volume transfer coefficient (K(trans)) related to histologic grade in human gliomas? , 2005, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[8]  Benjamin M Yeh,et al.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging as a pharmacodynamic measure of response after acute dosing of AG-013736, an oral angiogenesis inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors: results from a phase I study. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  Eric Masson,et al.  Phase I study of the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of PTK787/ZK 222584 administered twice daily in patients with advanced cancer. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  K. Flaherty,et al.  Pharmacodynamic study of BAY 43-9006 in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma , 2005 .

[11]  P. Catalano,et al.  High-dose bevacizumab improves survival when combined with FOLFOX4 in previously treated advanced colorectal cancer: Results from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) study E3200 , 2005 .

[12]  R. Gray,et al.  Randomized phase II/III trial of paclitaxel (P) plus carboplatin (C) with or without bevacizumab (NSC #704865) in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Trial - E4599 , 2005 .

[13]  M. Knopp,et al.  The assessment of antiangiogenic and antivascular therapies in early-stage clinical trials using magnetic resonance imaging: issues and recommendations , 2005, British Journal of Cancer.

[14]  J. Ferlay,et al.  Global Cancer Statistics, 2002 , 2005, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[15]  G J M Parker,et al.  Blockade of platelet-derived growth factor receptor-beta by CDP860, a humanized, PEGylated di-Fab', leads to fluid accumulation and is associated with increased tumor vascularized volume. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  E. Eisenhauer,et al.  Re: New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors (ovarian cancer). , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[17]  J. Berlin,et al.  Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  Diego R. Martín,et al.  Does hypervascularity of liver metastases as detected on MRI predict disease progression in breast cancer patients? , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  M. Cronk,et al.  Case report of a generalized seizure related to Paclitaxel infusion. , 2004, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[20]  Ricky T. Tong,et al.  Direct evidence that the VEGF-specific antibody bevacizumab has antivascular effects in human rectal cancer , 2004, Nature Medicine.

[21]  K. Skullerud,et al.  Prognostic significance of CT contrast enhancement within histological subgroups of intracranial glioma , 1998, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[22]  E. Eisenhauer,et al.  Re: New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors (ovarian cancer). , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[23]  K. Miller E2100: a phase III trial of paclitaxel versus paclitaxel/bevacizumab for metastatic breast cancer. , 2003, Clinical breast cancer.

[24]  Michael Brady,et al.  Improved Optimization for the Robust and Accurate Linear Registration and Motion Correction of Brain Images , 2002, NeuroImage.

[25]  I. Tannock,et al.  Paclitaxel plus carboplatin versus standard chemotherapy with either single-agent carboplatin or cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in women with ovarian cancer: the ICON3 randomised trial , 2002, The Lancet.

[26]  M V Knopp,et al.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in oncology. , 2001, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[27]  J W Sayre,et al.  Prognostic factors in recurrent glioblastoma multiforme and anaplastic astrocytoma treated with selective intra-arterial chemotherapy. , 2000, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[28]  M. van Glabbeke,et al.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[29]  M Van Glabbeke,et al.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[30]  F M Muggia,et al.  Phase III randomized study of cisplatin versus paclitaxel versus cisplatin and paclitaxel in patients with suboptimal stage III or IV ovarian cancer: a gynecologic oncology group study. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[31]  M. Parmar,et al.  Advanced epithelial ovarian cancer , 1999 .

[32]  M. Schlumberger,et al.  Psychosocial impact of genetic testing in familial medullary-thyroid carcinoma: a multicentric pilot-evaluation. , 1999, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[33]  M. Parmar,et al.  Advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: 1998 consensus statements. , 1999, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[34]  A. Jemal,et al.  Global cancer statistics , 2011, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[35]  G Brix,et al.  Uterine cervical carcinoma: comparison of standard and pharmacokinetic analysis of time-intensity curves for assessment of tumor angiogenesis and patient survival. , 1998, Cancer research.

[36]  U. Veronesi,et al.  Oxford textbook of oncology , 1996 .

[37]  J C Ehrhardt,et al.  Tumor perfusion studies using fast magnetic resonance imaging technique in advanced cervical cancer: a new noninvasive predictive assay. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[38]  S. Sternberg,et al.  Diagnostic surgical pathology , 1994 .

[39]  B. Sevin,et al.  National survey of ovarian carcinoma VI: Critical assessment of Current International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Staging System , 1993, Cancer.

[40]  J. Folkman,et al.  Tumor angiogenesis and metastasis--correlation in invasive breast carcinoma. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[41]  J. Folkman What is the evidence that tumors are angiogenesis dependent? , 1990, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[42]  C. Metz ROC Methodology in Radiologic Imaging , 1986, Investigative radiology.

[43]  J. Hanley,et al.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. , 1983, Radiology.

[44]  D. Cavanagh,et al.  Epithelial carcinoma of the ovary. , 1983, Obstetrics and gynecology annual.

[45]  J. Fayos,et al.  Epithelial carcinoma of the ovary. , 1979, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.