Effects of long-term tillage systems on soil physical quality and crop yield in a Brazilian Ferralsol

Abstract Long-term soil tillage trials can provide important knowledge about sustainable changes in soil physical quality and crop yield. This study evaluated soil physical quality indicators under different long-term tillage systems and examined the relationships between quality indicators and crop yield. The study was carried out on a Rhodic Ferralsol with three tillage systems established in 1989: conventional tillage (CT), strategic tillage (ST), and no-tillage (NT). All treatments had long-term crop rotation. The soil parameters evaluated were total organic carbon (TOC), bulk density (ρs), macro and microporosity (Mac and Mic), relative gas diffusivity (D/D0), pore tortuosity (τ), relative field capacity (RFC), structural stability index (SSI), least-limiting water range (LLWR), and degree of compactness (DC, taking as reference the soil bulk density in which LLWR = 0). Soybean and maize yields in two consecutive summer seasons were measured. Conventional and strategic tillage provided higher ρs in the 0.15–0.30 m layer depth, leading to higher DC in CT. Using soil bulk density at LLWR = 0 as reference proved useful to assess soil DC and plant response. No-tillage provided lower DC in the 0–0.15 m (86 %) and 0.15–0.30 m (78 %) layers than CT (91 % and 94 %, respectively). The maize yield had a negative linear relationship to DC, with the lower values at DC > 87 %. All tillage systems affected D/D0, even at similar porosity values. The better soil physical quality under NT provided 1211 kg ha−1 higher maize yield compared with CT. The differences in soybean yield between treatments were not significant, but NT provided 381 kg ha−1 more than CT. These findings indicate that NT is the best system studied. Our results strongly suggest that ST does not improve physical properties of soils under NT with crop rotation, and that a diversified crop rotation in NT was efficient to avoid soil physical degradation.

[1]  L. J. Munkholm,et al.  Limiting Water Range: A Case Study for Compacted Subsoils , 2019, Soil Science Society of America Journal.

[2]  S. Mooney,et al.  Assessing the long-term effects of zero-tillage on the macroporosity of Brazilian soils using X-ray Computed Tomography , 2019, Geoderma.

[3]  Van Genuchten,et al.  A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils , 1980 .

[4]  M. T. Moraes,et al.  Age-hardening phenomena in an oxisol from the subtropical region of Brazil , 2017 .

[5]  H. Debiasi,et al.  Chiseling and gypsum application affecting soil physical attributes, root growth and soybean yield , 2019, REVISTA CIÊNCIA AGRONÔMICA.

[6]  D. Rolph,et al.  Infiltration Rate as Affected by an Alfalfa and No-till Cotton Cropping System , 1990 .

[7]  C. A. Tormena,et al.  MÉTODO ALTERNATIVO PARA QUANTIFICAÇÃO DO INTERVALO HÍDRICO ÓTIMO EM LABORATÓRIO , 2014 .

[8]  Márcio R. Nunes,et al.  Effect of soil chiseling on soil structure and root growth for a clayey soil under no-tillage , 2015 .

[9]  J. Kirkegaard,et al.  The strategic use of minimum tillage within conservation agriculture in southern New South Wales, Australia , 2019, Soil and Tillage Research.

[10]  G Spoor,et al.  Subsoil compaction: risk, avoidance, identification and alleviation , 2003 .

[11]  G. Feyereisen,et al.  Soil Water Dynamics and Nitrate Leaching Under Corn–Soybean Rotation, Continuous Corn, and Kura Clover , 2018 .

[12]  Craig F. Drury,et al.  Use of indicators and pore volume-function characteristics to quantify soil physical quality , 2009 .

[13]  A. Kassam,et al.  Overview of the Worldwide Spread of Conservation Agriculture , 2015 .

[14]  W. J. Busscher,et al.  ADJUSTMENT OF FLAT-TIPPED PENETROMETER RESISTANCE DATA TO A COMMON WATER CONTENT , 1990 .

[15]  E. Perfect,et al.  Characterization of the least limiting water range of soils , 1994 .

[16]  Christian J. M. G. Pieri,et al.  Fertility of Soils: A Future for Farming in the West African Savannah , 1992 .

[17]  A. Melland,et al.  Strategic tillage in conservation agricultural systems of north-eastern Australia: why, where, when and how? , 2017, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[18]  K. Schwärzel,et al.  Effects of tillage intensity on pore system and physical quality of silt-textured soils detected by multiple methods , 2019, Soil Research.

[19]  P. Weisskopf,et al.  Two decades of no-till in the Oberacker long-term field experiment: Part II. Soil porosity and gas transport parameters , 2016 .

[20]  Leontino Oliveira Neto,et al.  Soil compaction management and soybean yields with cover crops under no-till and occasional chiseling , 2017 .

[21]  D. Cox,et al.  An Analysis of Transformations , 1964 .

[22]  T. J. C. Amado,et al.  Resistência à penetração, eficiência de escarificadores mecânicos e produtividade da soja em Latossolo argiloso manejado sob plantio direto de longa duração , 2014 .

[23]  J. Deckers,et al.  World Reference Base for Soil Resources , 1998 .

[24]  A. R. Grable,et al.  Effects of Bulk Density, Aggregate Size, and Soil Water Suction on Oxygen Diffusion, Redox Potentials, and Elongation of Corn Roots 1 , 1968 .

[25]  J. Quirk,et al.  Permeability of porous solids , 1961 .

[26]  M. Taboada,et al.  Comparison of compaction induced by conventional and zero tillage in two soils of the Rolling Pampa of Argentina , 1998 .

[27]  Per Schjønning,et al.  Transmission of vertical stress in a real soil profile. Part I: Site description, evaluation of the Söhne model, and the effect of topsoil tillage , 2011 .

[28]  Yuncong C. Li,et al.  Soil Organic Matter and Physical Attributes Affected by Crop Rotation Under No‐till , 2013 .

[29]  E. Caires,et al.  Liming in the conversion from degraded pastureland to a no-till cropping system in Southern Brazil , 2016 .

[30]  Yakov A. Pachepsky,et al.  Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity of US Soils Grouped According to Textural Class and Bulk Density , 2015 .

[31]  M. T. Moraes,et al.  Critical limits of soil penetration resistance in a rhodic Eutrudox , 2014 .

[32]  G. Barth,et al.  Soil chemical attributes and energetic potential of agricultural residual biomasses provided by 23-year soil management , 2019, Bragantia.

[33]  Yu Bo-Ming,et al.  A Geometry Model for Tortuosity of Flow Path in Porous Media , 2004 .

[34]  Paulo Leonel Libardi,et al.  Caracterização do intervalo hídrico ótimo de um latossolo roxo sob plantio direto , 1998 .

[35]  T. P. Leão,et al.  Least limiting water range: A potential indicator of changes in near-surface soil physical quality after the conversion of Brazilian Savanna into pasture , 2006 .

[36]  R. Weil,et al.  Crop Cover Root Channels May Alleviate Soil Compaction Effects on Soybean Crop , 2004 .

[37]  Wainer Gomes Gonçalves,et al.  Least limiting water range in assessing compaction in a Brazilian Cerrado latosol growing sugarcane , 2014 .

[38]  C. G. Tornquist,et al.  Soil organic carbon stocks of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil , 2009 .

[39]  M. M. Rolim,et al.  Compressive properties and least limiting water range of plough layer and plough pan in sugarcane fields , 2020, Soil Use and Management.

[40]  J. M. Reichert,et al.  Grau de compactação, propriedades físicas e rendimento de culturas em Latossolo e Argissolo , 2007 .

[41]  T. P. Leão,et al.  Long-term effects of no-tillage on dynamic soil physical properties in a Rhodic Ferrasol in Paraná, Brazil , 2009 .

[42]  S. Glantz,et al.  Primer of Applied Regression & Analysis of Variance , 1990 .

[43]  C. Cerri,et al.  Linking physical quality and CO2 emissions under long-term no-till and conventional-till in a subtropical soil in Brazil , 2010, Plant and Soil.

[44]  A. A. Mahboubi,et al.  Integral energy of conventional available water, least limiting water range and integral water capacity for better characterization of water availability and soil physical quality , 2011 .

[45]  M. Ijaz,et al.  Influence of varying tillage systems and nitrogen application on crop allometry, chlorophyll contents, biomass production and net returns of maize (Zea mays L.) , 2017 .