Simulated central vision loss impairs implicit location probability learning

Some eye diseases, especially macular degeneration, can cause central vision loss (CVL), impairing goal-driven guidance of attention. Does CVL also affect implicit, experience-driven attention? We investigated how simulated central scotomas affected young adults' ability to prioritize locations frequently containing visual search targets (location probability learning). Participants searched among distractor letter 'L's for a target 'T' that appeared more often in one screen quadrant than others. To dissociate potential impairments to statistical learning of target locations and attentional guidance, two experiments each included search with and without simulated scotomas. Experiment 1 successfully induced probability learning in a no-scotoma phase. When participants later searched both with and without simulated scotomas, they showed persistent, statistically equivalent spatial biases in both no-scotoma and scotoma search. Experiment 2 trained participants with a central scotoma. While Experiment 1's participants acquired probability learning regardless of their self-reported awareness of the target's location probability, in Experiment 2 only aware participants learned to bias attention to the high probability region. Similarly, learning with a scotoma affected search with no scotoma in aware but not unaware participants. Together, these results show that simulated central vision loss interferes with the acquisition of implicitly learned location probability learning, supporting a role of central vision in implicit spatial attentional biases.

[1]  Stefan Pollmann,et al.  Intact Contextual Cueing for Search in Realistic Scenes with Simulated Central or Peripheral Vision Loss , 2020, Translational vision science & technology.

[2]  M. Bucci,et al.  Visual searching capabilities in Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) subjects , 2019, Applied neuropsychology. Adult.

[3]  Caitlin A Sisk,et al.  Habit-like attention. , 2019, Current opinion in psychology.

[4]  Yi Ni Toh,et al.  Implicit guidance of attention in contextual cueing: Neuropsychological and developmental evidence , 2019, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[5]  Caitlin A Sisk,et al.  Implicitly-learned spatial attention is unimpaired in patients with Parkinson's disease , 2018, Neuropsychologia.

[6]  Li Z. Sha,et al.  Experience-guided attention: Uniform and implicit , 2018, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[7]  M. Boucart,et al.  Impact of age‐related macular degeneration on object searches in realistic panoramic scenes , 2018, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[8]  Wilma Koutstaal,et al.  Aging affects the balance between goal-guided and habitual spatial attention , 2017, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[9]  Yuhong V. Jiang,et al.  Habitual versus goal-driven attention , 2017, Cortex.

[10]  M. DeAngelis,et al.  Epidemiology of age-related macular degeneration (AMD): associations with cardiovascular disease phenotypes and lipid factors , 2016, Eye and Vision.

[11]  E. Livesey,et al.  Contextual cuing as a form of nonconscious learning: Theoretical and empirical analysis in large and very large samples , 2016, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[12]  Yuhong V Jiang,et al.  Spatial working memory interferes with explicit, but not probabilistic cuing of spatial attention. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  S. Pollmann,et al.  Central and peripheral vision loss differentially affects contextual cueing in visual search. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[14]  Yuhong Jiang,et al.  First saccadic eye movement reveals persistent attentional guidance by implicit learning. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  James T. Townsend,et al.  Methods of Modeling Capacity in Simple Processing Systems , 2014 .

[16]  Bosco S. Tjan,et al.  Rapid and Persistent Adaptability of Human Oculomotor Control in Response to Simulated Central Vision Loss , 2013, Current Biology.

[17]  S. Pollmann,et al.  Contextual cueing impairment in patients with age-related macular degeneration. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[18]  Stefan Pollmann,et al.  A behavioral task for the validation of a gaze-contingent simulated scotoma , 2013, Behavior Research Methods.

[19]  Yuhong V Jiang,et al.  Rapid acquisition but slow extinction of an attentional bias in space. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[21]  Stefan Pollmann,et al.  Simulated loss of foveal vision eliminates visual search advantage in repeated displays , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[22]  Krista A. Ehinger,et al.  SUN database: Large-scale scene recognition from abbey to zoo , 2010, 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[23]  Britt Anderson,et al.  Spatial Probability Aids Visual Stimulus Discrimination , 2010, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[24]  G. Legge,et al.  Functional and cortical adaptations to central vision loss , 2005, Visual Neuroscience.

[25]  Frans W Cornelissen,et al.  The Influence of Artificial Scotomas on Eye Movements during Visual Search , 2005, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[26]  M. Chun,et al.  Contextual Cueing: Implicit Learning and Memory of Visual Context Guides Spatial Attention , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[27]  R. Klein,et al.  Familiarity and attention: Does what we know affect what we notice? , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[28]  J. Enns,et al.  Relations between covert orienting and filtering in the development of visual attention. , 1989, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[29]  J Miller,et al.  Components of the location probability effect in visual search tasks. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  J. H. Bertera The effect of simulated scotomas on visual search in normal subjects. , 1988, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[31]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[32]  Yuhong Jiang,et al.  Directing attention based on incidental learning in children with autism spectrum disorder. , 2013, Neuropsychology.

[33]  Eyal M. Reingold,et al.  Running head : SACCADIC SELECTIVITY DURING VISUAL SEARCH Saccadic selectivity during visual search : The influence of central processing difficulty , 2002 .

[34]  James T. Townsend,et al.  The Stochastic Modeling of Elementary Psychological Processes , 1983 .

[35]  Joy J. Geng,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article PROBABILITY CUING OF TARGET LOCATION FACILITATES VISUAL SEARCH IMPLICITLY IN NORMAL PARTICIPANTS AND PATIENTS WITH HEMISPATIAL NEGLECT , 2022 .