Ultrasound detection of rotator cuff tears: observer agreement related to increasing experience.

OBJECTIVE Ultrasound of the rotator cuff is considered to be operator-dependent with its accuracy being related to the operator's level of experience. This study was conducted to test the hypothesis that ultrasound performed by operators with different levels of experience will give nonreproducible results. SUBJECTS AND METHODS Two radiologists, one general radiologist with no experience in musculoskeletal ultrasound and one experienced musculoskeletal radiologist, independently performed ultrasound on 200 shoulders in 183 consecutive patients. Agreement was assessed. Cohen's kappa values with standard errors were calculated. In 71 patients the ultrasound findings could be related to surgical findings. RESULTS The diagnoses of full-thickness and partial-thickness rotator cuff tears were made with agreements of 98% (κ-value: 0.95 [standard error, 0.03]) and 90% (κ-value: 0.79 [0.05]), respectively. Agreement for full-thickness tears was constant; the agreement for partial-thickness tears improved from 80% to 98% in the last quarter of the study period. Based on the 71 patients who underwent shoulder surgery, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for detecting full-thickness tears by the experienced and general radiologists were 94%, 94%, and 94% and 89%, 91%, and 90%, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for detecting partial-thickness tears by the experienced and general radiologists were 100%, 32%, and 57% and 84%, 35%, and 53%, respectively. CONCLUSION The hypothesis that ultrasound of the shoulder is operator-dependent and related to experience was refuted. In this study, there was excellent agreement for the detection of rotator cuff tears, which only slightly improved with the increasing experience of the general radiologist. Accuracy of rotator cuff tear detection was high and in accordance with the results in the literature.

[1]  S. Ehara Patient selection and study indications for shoulder ultrasound. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  M. Mayerhöfer,et al.  Bildgebung vor und nach arthroskopischen Eingriffen an der Schulter , 2011, Arthroskopie.

[3]  Andrea J. Frangos,et al.  Accuracy of MRI, MR arthrography, and ultrasound in the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears: a meta-analysis. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  P. Champsaur,et al.  Sonography of the painful shoulder: role of the operator’s experience , 2008, Skeletal Radiology.

[5]  P. Boendermaker Teach the teachers , 2007 .

[6]  M. V. van Holsbeeck,et al.  Ultrasound of the rotator cuff with MRI and anatomic correlation. , 2007, European journal of radiology.

[7]  B. Wolf,et al.  Interobserver Agreement in the Classification of Rotator Cuff Tears , 2007, The American journal of sports medicine.

[8]  E. Rummeny,et al.  Rotator cuff tears: assessment with MR arthrography in 275 patients with arthroscopic correlation , 2007, European Radiology.

[9]  A. Goverde,et al.  Train the trainers! , 2006 .

[10]  J. Blickman,et al.  From the RSNA refresher courses: US of the rotator cuff: pitfalls, limitations, and artifacts. , 2006, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[11]  A. Iagnocco,et al.  Interobserver reliability in musculoskeletal ultrasonography: results from a “Teach the Teachers” rheumatologist course , 2005, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[12]  E. Mascha,et al.  Accuracy of office-based ultrasonography of the shoulder for the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[13]  P. O'connor,et al.  Interobserver variation in sonography of the painful shoulder , 2005, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[14]  A. Iagnocco,et al.  Interobserver reliability of rheumatologists performing musculoskeletal ultrasonography: results from a EULAR “Train the trainers” course , 2005, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[15]  H. Smith,et al.  Diagnostic ultrasound of the shoulder—a method for experts only? , 2005, Acta orthopaedica.

[16]  K. Yamaguchi,et al.  Sonography of the rotator cuff: analysis of interobserver variability. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  D. Ziegler The use of in-office, orthopaedist-performed ultrasound of the shoulder to evaluate and manage rotator cuff disorders. , 2004, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[18]  K. Yamaguchi,et al.  Detection and quantification of rotator cuff tears. Comparison of ultrasonographic, magnetic resonance imaging, and arthroscopic findings in seventy-one consecutive cases. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[19]  P. Kolowich,et al.  Full-thickness and partial-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears: value of US signs in diagnosis. , 2004, Radiology.

[20]  N Waugh,et al.  The effectiveness of diagnostic tests for the assessment of shoulder pain due to soft tissue disorders: a systematic review. , 2003, Health technology assessment.

[21]  C. Roberts,et al.  Sonography for the office screening of suspected rotator cuff tears: early experience of the orthopedic surgeon. , 1998, American journal of orthopedics.

[22]  S. F. Quinn,et al.  MR imaging of the rotator cuff tendon: interobserver agreement and analysis of interpretive errors. , 1997, Radiology.

[23]  W. Eyler,et al.  US depiction of partial-thickness tear of the rotator cuff. , 1995, Radiology.

[24]  D. Mitchell,et al.  Rotator cuff disorders: interobserver and intraobserver variation in diagnosis with MR imaging. , 1995, Radiology.