Mass scaling and stable time step estimates for isogeometric analysis

Summary Metal stamping is one of the most cost effective manufacturing methods for producing precision parts. The precision of the parts is a function of the uniformity of the material used for the blank and the design of the dies. During the metal stamping process, the blank undergoes large, inelastic deformations, and once it is removed from the dies, springs back to a shape different from the die. This spring back must be accounted for in the design of the die, and its prediction is a major challenge in computational mechanics. Isogeometric analysis, which uses the same basis functions as the computer-aided design programs used to design the shape of the part, is an attractive alternative to traditional finite element analysis for metal stamping. Mass scaling, and the underlying stable time step estimates, that are commonly used in metal stamping simulations are presented for isogeometric analysis. Example calculations are presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of isogeometric analysis in metal stamping. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  T. Hughes,et al.  Isogeometric analysis : CAD, finite elements, NURBS, exact geometry and mesh refinement , 2005 .

[2]  T. Belytschko,et al.  Explicit multi-time step integration for first and second order finite element semidiscretizations , 1993 .

[3]  A. Gautesen On Elastodynamic Diffraction of Waves From a Line-Load by a Crack , 1984 .

[4]  Thomas J. R. Hughes,et al.  A large deformation, rotation-free, isogeometric shell , 2011 .

[5]  J. H. Wilkinson The algebraic eigenvalue problem , 1966 .

[6]  Thomas J. R. Hughes,et al.  Isogeometric shell analysis: The Reissner-Mindlin shell , 2010 .

[7]  Wing Kam Liu,et al.  Nonlinear Finite Elements for Continua and Structures , 2000 .

[8]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  Mixed methods for time integration , 1979 .

[9]  Folco Casadei,et al.  Binary spatial partitioning of the central‐difference time integration scheme for explicit fast transient dynamics , 2009 .

[10]  M. Sansalone,et al.  A new shell formulation using complete 3D constitutive laws , 2011 .

[11]  Roland Wüchner,et al.  Isogeometric shell analysis with Kirchhoff–Love elements , 2009 .

[12]  T. Belytschko,et al.  X‐FEM in isogeometric analysis for linear fracture mechanics , 2011 .

[13]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  Eigenvalues and Stable Time Steps for the Uniform Strain Hexahedron and Quadrilateral , 1984 .

[14]  Thomas J. R. Hughes,et al.  Blended isogeometric shells , 2013 .

[15]  Jerry I. Lin,et al.  Explicit algorithms for the nonlinear dynamics of shells , 1984 .

[16]  T. Belytschko,et al.  A generalized finite element formulation for arbitrary basis functions: From isogeometric analysis to XFEM , 2010 .

[17]  R. Hill A theory of the yielding and plastic flow of anisotropic metals , 1948, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[18]  D. Benson Computational methods in Lagrangian and Eulerian hydrocodes , 1992 .

[19]  David J. Benson,et al.  Stable time step estimation for multi-material Eulerian hydrocodes , 1998 .

[20]  Thomas J. R. Hughes,et al.  Isogeometric Analysis: Toward Integration of CAD and FEA , 2009 .