Inertial acceleration as a measure of linear vection: An alternative to magnitude estimation

The present study focused on the development of a procedure to assess perceived self-motion induced by visual surround motion—vection. Using an apparatus that permitted independent control of visual and inertial stimuli, prone observers were translated along their headx-axis (fore/aft). The observers’ task was to report the direction of self-motion during passive forward and backward translations of their bodies coupled with exposure to various visual surround conditions. The proportion of “forward” responses was used to calculate each observer’s point of subjective equality (PSE) for each surround condition. The results showed that the moving visual stimulus produced a significant shift in the PSE when data from the moving surround condition were compared with the stationary surround and no-vision condition. Further, the results indicated that vection increased monotonically with surround velocities between 4 and 40°/sec. It was concluded that linear vection can be measured in terms of changes in the amplitude of whole-body inertial acceleration required to elicit equivalent numbers of “forward” and “backward” self-motion reports.

[1]  L. Young,et al.  A revised dynamic otolith model. , 1968, Aerospace medicine.

[2]  Ian P. Howard,et al.  Spatial vision within egocentric and exocentric frames of reference , 1991 .

[3]  A. Berthoz,et al.  Contribution of the otoliths to the calculation of linear displacement. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  T. Stoffregen Flow structure versus retinal location in the optical control of stance. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  Walter F. Bischof,et al.  Thresholds From Psychometric Functions: Superiority of Bootstrap to Incremental and Probit Variance Estimators , 1991 .

[6]  W. Warren,et al.  The role of central and peripheral vision in perceiving the direction of self-motion , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  S. S. Stevens The Psychophysics of Sensory Function. , 1960 .

[8]  Alain Berthoz,et al.  Linear Self Motion Perception , 1982 .

[9]  J. Lishman,et al.  The Autonomy of Visual Kinaesthesis , 1973, Perception.

[10]  Johannes Dichgans,et al.  Characteristics of moving visual scenes influencing spatial orientation , 1975, Vision Research.

[11]  G. Brindley The physiology of the retina and visual pathways , 1962 .

[12]  E. Poulton The new psychophysics: Six models for magnitude estimation. , 1968 .

[13]  Ernst Mach,et al.  Grundlinien der Lehre von den Bewegungsempfindungen , 1967 .

[14]  J M Flach,et al.  Sources of optical information useful for perception of speed of rectilinear self-motion. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  D. Foster,et al.  Thresholds From Psychometric Functions : Superiority of Bootstrap to Incremental and Probit Variance Estimators , 1991 .

[16]  A. J. Benson,et al.  Thresholds for the detection of the direction of whole-body, linear movement in the horizontal plane. , 1986, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[17]  David N. Lee,et al.  Visual proprioceptive control of standing in human infants , 1974 .

[18]  R. Teghtsoonian,et al.  On the exponents in Stevens' law and the constant in Ekman's law. , 1971, Psychological review.

[19]  G. Westheimer,et al.  A shift in the perceived simultaneity of adjacent visual stimuli following adaptation to stroboscopic motion along the same axis , 1985, Vision Research.

[20]  G J Andersen,et al.  Spatial orientation from optic flow in the central visual field , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  J Tiffin,et al.  Distortion of drivers' estimates of automobile speed as a function of speed adaptation. , 1969, The Journal of applied psychology.

[22]  D E Parker,et al.  The Effects of Unidirectional Visual Surround Translation on Detection of Physical Linear Motion Direction a : A Psychophysical Scale for Vection , 1992, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[23]  J. Dichgans,et al.  Visual-Vestibular Interaction: Effects on Self-Motion Perception and Postural Control , 1978 .

[24]  L R Young,et al.  Interaction of optokinetic and vestibular stimuli in motion perception. , 1973, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[25]  L R Young,et al.  Influence of visual and motion cues on manual lateral stabilization. , 1987, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[26]  L. Young,et al.  Subjective detection of vertical acceleration: a velocity-dependent response? , 1978, Acta oto-laryngologica.