Development and Preliminary Evaluation of a Multivariate Index Assay for Ovarian Cancer

Background Most women with a clinical presentation consistent with ovarian cancer have benign conditions. Therefore methods to distinguish women with ovarian cancer from those with benign conditions would be beneficial. We describe the development and preliminary evaluation of a serum-based multivariate assay for ovarian cancer. This hypothesis-driven study examined whether an informative pattern could be detected in stage I disease that persists through later stages. Methodology/Principal Findings Sera, collected under uniform protocols from multiple institutions, representing 176 cases and 187 controls from women presenting for surgery were examined using high-throughput, multiplexed immunoassays. All stages and common subtypes of epithelial ovarian cancer, and the most common benign ovarian conditions were represented. A panel of 104 antigens, 44 autoimmune and 56 infectious disease markers were assayed and informative combinations identified. Using a training set of 91 stage I data sets, representing 61 individual samples, and an equivalent number of controls, an 11-analyte profile, composed of CA-125, CA 19-9, EGF-R, C-reactive protein, myoglobin, apolipoprotein A1, apolipoprotein CIII, MIP-1α, IL-6, IL-18 and tenascin C was identified and appears informative for all stages and common subtypes of ovarian cancer. Using a testing set of 245 samples, approximately twice the size of the model building set, the classifier had 91.3% sensitivity and 88.5% specificity. While these preliminary results are promising, further refinement and extensive validation of the classifier in a clinical trial is necessary to determine if the test has clinical value. Conclusions/Significance We describe a blood-based assay using 11 analytes that can distinguish women with ovarian cancer from those with benign conditions. Preliminary evaluation of the classifier suggests it has the potential to offer approximately 90% sensitivity and 90% specificity. While promising, the performance needs to be assessed in a blinded clinical validation study.

[1]  G. Ricci,et al.  Management of the adnexal mass. , 2011, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[2]  L. Lee-Jones Ovarian tumours: an overview , 2011 .

[3]  Wesley S Wiggins,et al.  Multianalyte Profiling of Serum Antigens and Autoimmune and Infectious Disease Molecules to Identify Biomarkers Dysregulated in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer , 2008, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[4]  N. Urban,et al.  Combining a symptoms index with CA 125 to improve detection of ovarian cancer , 2008, Cancer.

[5]  P. Brown,et al.  Systematic Evaluation of Candidate Blood Markers for Detecting Ovarian Cancer , 2008, PloS one.

[6]  D. Alberts,et al.  A Prospective Study of Risk-Reducing Salpingo-oophorectomy and Longitudinal CA-125 Screening among Women at Increased Genetic Risk of Ovarian Cancer: Design and Baseline Characteristics: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study , 2008, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[7]  D. Ward,et al.  Diagnostic Markers for Early Detection of Ovarian Cancer , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.

[8]  Thorsten Verch,et al.  The use of multiple novel tumor biomarkers for the detection of ovarian carcinoma in patients with a pelvic mass. , 2008, Gynecologic oncology.

[9]  Patrick Neven,et al.  Discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses by specialist ultrasound examination versus serum CA-125. , 2007, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[10]  M. Markman Development of an ovarian cancer symptom index: Possibilities for earlier detection , 2007, Cancer.

[11]  Michelle L. Wynn,et al.  Predictors of comprehensive surgical treatment in patients with ovarian cancer , 2007, Cancer.

[12]  L. Brinton,et al.  C-Reactive Protein Concentrations and Subsequent Ovarian Cancer Risk , 2007, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[13]  N. Urban,et al.  Development of an ovarian cancer symptom index , 2007 .

[14]  Satish Phatak,et al.  Role of cancer antigen-125 from pleural & ascitic fluid samples in non malignant conditions. , 2007, The Indian journal of medical research.

[15]  N. Hoogerbrugge,et al.  Surveillance of women at high risk for hereditary ovarian cancer is inefficient , 2006, British Journal of Cancer.

[16]  E. Feuer,et al.  SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2003 , 2006 .

[17]  T. Bourne,et al.  Logistic regression model to distinguish between the benign and malignant adnexal mass before surgery: a multicenter study by the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Group. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  William L. Bigbee,et al.  Multiplexed Immunobead-Based Cytokine Profiling for Early Detection of Ovarian Cancer , 2005, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[19]  K. Hatch,et al.  Validation of Referral Guidelines for Women With Pelvic Masses , 2005, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[20]  Steven J Skates,et al.  Preoperative sensitivity and specificity for early-stage ovarian cancer when combining cancer antigen CA-125II, CA 15-3, CA 72-4, and macrophage colony-stimulating factor using mixtures of multivariate normal distributions. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[22]  Steven J Skates,et al.  Calculation of the risk of ovarian cancer from serial CA-125 values for preclinical detection in postmenopausal women. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  M. Provencio,et al.  Cancer Antigen 125 Associated With Multiple Benign and Malignant Pathologies , 2003, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[24]  E. Petricoin,et al.  Use of proteomic patterns in serum to identify ovarian cancer , 2002, The Lancet.

[25]  P. Buamah Benign conditions associated with raised serum CA‐125 concentration , 2000, Journal of surgical oncology.

[26]  P. Rose,et al.  Tolerance of twenty-four hour paclitaxel and carboplatin as first-line therapy in ovarian, peritoneal and fallopian tube carcinoma. , 1999, International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society.

[27]  R. Newcombe Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[28]  P. Rose,et al.  Second-line therapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin for recurrent disease following first-line therapy with paclitaxel and platinum in ovarian or peritoneal carcinoma. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[29]  A. Gadducci,et al.  Preoperative evaluation of CA 125 and CA 19-9 serum levels in patients with ovarian masses. , 1988, European journal of gynaecological oncology.

[30]  J. Bouma,et al.  Serum CA 125 levels in epithelial ovarian cancer: relation with findings at second‐look operations and their role in the detection of tumour recurrence , 1987, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[31]  D. Lax Robust Estimators of Scale: Finite-Sample Performance in Long-Tailed Symmetric Distributions , 1985 .

[32]  H. Norris,et al.  Misstaging of Ovarian Cancer , 1985, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[33]  R. Bast,et al.  Monoclonal antibody immunoradiometric assay for an antigenic determinant (CA 125) associated with human epithelial ovarian carcinomas. , 1984, Cancer research.

[34]  U. G. Dailey Cancer,Facts and Figures about. , 2022, Journal of the National Medical Association.