Country of Origin as a Heuristic Cue: The Effects of Message Ambiguity and Product Involvement

This research applies the heuristic-systematic model to understand how country-of-origin (CO) cues can affect the way consumers process advertising messages and evaluate advertised products under different conditions. Findings of Experiment 1 show that, when product information is ambiguous, consumers are more likely to engage in heuristic processing, relying on CO cues to infer product quality and form their product evaluations. However, when product information is unambiguous, consumers engage in systematic processing and evaluate the product based on their assessments of product attributes. Findings of Experiment 2 further suggest that product involvement affects the extent to which consumers engage in heuristic processing when message ambiguity is at different levels. Specifically, mediational analyses indicate that, when product information featured in an ad is ambiguous, a low-involving product engages consumers in heuristic processing. Furthermore, when product information is unambiguous, a low-involving product engages consumers in systematic processing, whereas a high-involving product involves participants in an additivity processing style in which CO cue-based heuristic processing and attribute-based systematic processing co-occur.

[1]  M. Sherif,et al.  The psychology of attitudes. , 1946, Psychological review.

[2]  W. Bilkey,et al.  Country-of-Origin Effects on Product Evaluations , 1982 .

[3]  Sevgin Eroğlu,et al.  Effects of Individual and Product‐specific Variables on Utilising Country of Origin as a Product Quality Cue , 1989 .

[4]  M. Roth,et al.  Matching Product Catgeory and Country Image Perceptions: A Framework for Managing Country-of-Origin Effects , 1992 .

[5]  Ravi Parameswaran,et al.  Facets of Country of Origin Image: An Empirical Assessment , 1994 .

[6]  Shelly Chaiken,et al.  Brand name as a heuristic cue: The effects of task importance and expectancy confirmation on consumer judgments. , 1992 .

[7]  Thomas J. Madden,et al.  Attitude toward the Ad: An Assessment of Diverse Measurement Indices under Different Processing “Sets” , 1988 .

[8]  D. Maheswaran,et al.  Country of Origin as a Stereotype: Effects of Consumer Expertise and Attribute Strength on Product Evaluations , 1994 .

[9]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Promoting systematic processing in low-motivation settings: effect of incongruent information on processing and judgment. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  Johny K. Johansson,et al.  Image Variables in Multi-Attribute Product Evaluations: Country-of-Origin Effects , 1984 .

[11]  Robert S. Wyer,et al.  Effects of Country-of-Origin and Product-Attribute Information on Product Evaluation: An Information Processing Perspective , 1989 .

[12]  Robert S. Wyer,et al.  Determinants of Product Evaluation: Effects of the Time Interval between Knowledge of a Product's Country of Origin and Information about Its Specific Attributes , 1990 .

[13]  M. Holbrook,et al.  Assessing the Role of Emotions as Mediators of Consumer Responses to Advertising , 1987 .

[14]  David Shipley,et al.  A METHOD FOR MODELLING CONSUMER PERCEPTIONS OF COUNTRY OF ORIGIN , 1988 .

[15]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  Alice H. Eagly,et al.  Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. , 1989 .

[17]  J. Zaichkowsky Measuring the Involvement Construct , 1985 .

[18]  P. Wright The Cognitive Processes Mediating Acceptance of Advertising , 1973 .

[19]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Audience response as a heuristic cue in persuasion. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  Deanna S. Kempf,et al.  Advertising Message Involvement: The Role of Enduring and Situational Factors , 1999 .

[21]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Brand Name as a Heuristic Cue , 1992 .

[22]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  S. Chaiken The heuristic model of persuasion. , 1987 .

[24]  Moonkyu Lee,et al.  The Korean versus American marketplace: Consumer reactions to foreign products , 1998 .

[25]  C. P. Rao,et al.  The effect of country‐of‐origin related stereotypes and personal beliefs on product evaluation , 1997 .

[26]  S. Chaiken Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. , 1980 .

[27]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Communication modality as a determinant of persuasion: The role of communicator salience. , 1983 .

[28]  Ikujiro Nonaka,et al.  Assessing the Impact of Country of Origin on Product Evaluations: A New Methodological Perspective , 1985 .

[29]  Russell N. Laczniak,et al.  An Examination of Factors Mediating and Moderating Advertising's Effect on Brand Attitude Formation , 1992 .