Country of Origin as a Heuristic Cue: The Effects of Message Ambiguity and Product Involvement
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] M. Sherif,et al. The psychology of attitudes. , 1946, Psychological review.
[2] W. Bilkey,et al. Country-of-Origin Effects on Product Evaluations , 1982 .
[3] Sevgin Eroğlu,et al. Effects of Individual and Product‐specific Variables on Utilising Country of Origin as a Product Quality Cue , 1989 .
[4] M. Roth,et al. Matching Product Catgeory and Country Image Perceptions: A Framework for Managing Country-of-Origin Effects , 1992 .
[5] Ravi Parameswaran,et al. Facets of Country of Origin Image: An Empirical Assessment , 1994 .
[6] Shelly Chaiken,et al. Brand name as a heuristic cue: The effects of task importance and expectancy confirmation on consumer judgments. , 1992 .
[7] Thomas J. Madden,et al. Attitude toward the Ad: An Assessment of Diverse Measurement Indices under Different Processing “Sets” , 1988 .
[8] D. Maheswaran,et al. Country of Origin as a Stereotype: Effects of Consumer Expertise and Attribute Strength on Product Evaluations , 1994 .
[9] S. Chaiken,et al. Promoting systematic processing in low-motivation settings: effect of incongruent information on processing and judgment. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[10] Johny K. Johansson,et al. Image Variables in Multi-Attribute Product Evaluations: Country-of-Origin Effects , 1984 .
[11] Robert S. Wyer,et al. Effects of Country-of-Origin and Product-Attribute Information on Product Evaluation: An Information Processing Perspective , 1989 .
[12] Robert S. Wyer,et al. Determinants of Product Evaluation: Effects of the Time Interval between Knowledge of a Product's Country of Origin and Information about Its Specific Attributes , 1990 .
[13] M. Holbrook,et al. Assessing the Role of Emotions as Mediators of Consumer Responses to Advertising , 1987 .
[14] David Shipley,et al. A METHOD FOR MODELLING CONSUMER PERCEPTIONS OF COUNTRY OF ORIGIN , 1988 .
[15] S. Chaiken,et al. Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[16] Alice H. Eagly,et al. Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. , 1989 .
[17] J. Zaichkowsky. Measuring the Involvement Construct , 1985 .
[18] P. Wright. The Cognitive Processes Mediating Acceptance of Advertising , 1973 .
[19] S. Chaiken,et al. Audience response as a heuristic cue in persuasion. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[20] Deanna S. Kempf,et al. Advertising Message Involvement: The Role of Enduring and Situational Factors , 1999 .
[21] S. Chaiken,et al. Brand Name as a Heuristic Cue , 1992 .
[22] D. A. Kenny,et al. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[23] S. Chaiken. The heuristic model of persuasion. , 1987 .
[24] Moonkyu Lee,et al. The Korean versus American marketplace: Consumer reactions to foreign products , 1998 .
[25] C. P. Rao,et al. The effect of country‐of‐origin related stereotypes and personal beliefs on product evaluation , 1997 .
[26] S. Chaiken. Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. , 1980 .
[27] S. Chaiken,et al. Communication modality as a determinant of persuasion: The role of communicator salience. , 1983 .
[28] Ikujiro Nonaka,et al. Assessing the Impact of Country of Origin on Product Evaluations: A New Methodological Perspective , 1985 .
[29] Russell N. Laczniak,et al. An Examination of Factors Mediating and Moderating Advertising's Effect on Brand Attitude Formation , 1992 .