Machine learning based prediction of wave breaking over a fringing reef

Abstract The characteristics of wave breaking in shallow waters that are of interest include whether a wave will break, the type of breaking that will occur, the breaking wave height, breaking depth, the position of breaking, the wave setup, and the transformation of the broken wave for given offshore wave characteristics and given bottom profile. Various methods have been proposed in the literature to estimate these wave-breaking characteristics. Deo et al. (2003) used a neural network approach to predict the breaking wave height and breaking depth for waves transforming over a range of simply sloped bottoms. The Deo et al. approach is extended here to predict other characteristics of wave breaking, including the type of wave breaking, the position of breaking, the wave setup, and the rate of dissipation of wave energy, in the case of waves impinging on a fringing reef. Observations from a series of specially conducted laboratory experiments involving monochromatic waves impinging on an idealized reef are used to develop and train respective models. The input parameters to the neural network models are the ratio of offshore wave height to the shallow-water depth of the flat section of the reef, H 1 / h s and the wave frequency parameter f H 1 / g . The breaker type classification model developed predicts the type of breaker with a success rate of 96 % , outperforming previously used criteria for classifying breaker types. The numeric prediction models for the dimensionless position of wave breaking for plunging and spilling breakers, for wave setup, and for the reduction in energy flux across the reef have performance ratings characterized by respective correlation coefficients of 0.99, 0.82, 0.89, and 0.94. The modest value for the correlation between prediction and the actual result for the position of breaking of spilling breakers is believed to be associated with inaccuracies in determination of the exact position of breaking and to difficulty in visually capturing spilling breakers in observations. High correlation between predicted and actual values of the reduction in energy flux across the reef is achieved in spite of the fact the model was trained using data from a wave tank that included partial reflection (characterized by 7% mean deviation among non-breaking waves) from the downstream end of the tank. The method can be extended to provide predictive models for consideration of a range of natural coastal conditions, random waves, and various bottom profiles and complex geometry, based on training and testing of the models using representative laboratory, field, and/or flow simulation, in support of accurate prediction of near-shore wave phenomena.

[1]  Maurizio Brocchini,et al.  Boussinesq modeling of breaking waves: Description of turbulence , 2004 .

[2]  Eric B. Baum,et al.  On the capabilities of multilayer perceptrons , 1988, J. Complex..

[3]  Takao Yamashita,et al.  Toward a Simple Model of the Wave Breaking Transition Region in Surf Zones , 1987 .

[4]  Robert G. Dean,et al.  Water wave mechanics for engineers and scientists , 1983 .

[5]  A. Iafrati Energy dissipation mechanisms in wave breaking processes: Spilling and highly aerated plunging breaking events , 2011 .

[6]  1DH Boussinesq modeling of wave transformation over fringing reefs , 2012 .

[7]  Marina Fruehauf Shore Protection Manual , 2016 .

[8]  R. G. Dean,et al.  Evaluation and development of water wave theories for engineering application. , 1974 .

[9]  M. Brocchini,et al.  Topographically controlled, breaking-wave-induced macrovortices. Part 3. The mixing features , 2006, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[10]  S. Monismith,et al.  Characteristics of Monochromatic Waves Breaking over Fringing Reefs , 2012 .

[11]  M. C. Deo,et al.  Neural networks for wave forecasting , 2001 .

[12]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques, 3rd Edition , 1999 .

[13]  Maurizio Brocchini,et al.  Topographically controlled, breaking-wave-induced macrovortices. Part 1. Widely separated breakwaters , 2004, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[14]  Joseph W. Boardman,et al.  The Moon Mineralogy Mapper (M3) imaging spectrometer for lunar science: Instrument description, calibration, on‐orbit measurements, science data calibration and on‐orbit validation , 2011 .

[15]  Makarand Deo,et al.  Prediction of breaking waves with neural networks , 2003 .

[16]  Richard J. Weggel MAXIMUM BREAKER HEIGHT , 1972 .

[17]  John M'Cowan On the highest wave of permanent type , 1893 .

[18]  Y. Goda A SYNTHESIS OF BREAKER INDICES , 1970 .

[19]  Y. Goda,et al.  A PARAMETRIC MODEL FOR RANDOM WAVE DEFORMATION BY BREAKING ON ARBITRARY BEACH PROFILES , 1997 .

[20]  D. Peregrine Long waves on a beach , 1967, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[21]  I. A. Svendsen,et al.  The flow in surf-zone waves , 2000 .

[22]  J. M. M. D.Sc. XXXIX. On the highest wave of permanent type , 1894 .

[23]  Robert G. Dean,et al.  Wave height variation across beaches of arbitrary profile , 1985 .

[24]  Y. Goda Irregular Wave Deformation in the Surf Zone , 1975 .

[25]  Makarand Deo,et al.  Real time wave forecasting using neural networks , 1998 .

[26]  Y. Goda Reanalysis of Regular and Random Breaking Wave Statistics , 2010 .

[27]  A. Kennedy,et al.  Topographically controlled, breaking-wave-induced macrovortices. Part 2. Changing geometries , 2006, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.