SVD-Based Optimal Filtering Technique for Noise Reduction in Hearing Aids Using Two Microphones

AbstractWe introduce a new SVD-based (Singular value decomposition) strategy for noise reduction in hearing aids. This technique is evaluated for noise reduction in a behind-the-ear (BTE) hearing aid where two omnidirectional microphones are mounted in an endfire configuration. The behaviour of the SVD-based technique is compared to a two-stage adaptive beamformer for hearing aids developed by Vanden Berghe and Wouters (1998). The evaluation and comparison is done with a performance metric based on the speech intelligibility index (SII). The speech and noise signals are recorded in reverberant conditions with a signal-to-noise ratio of and the spectrum of the noise signals is similar to the spectrum of the speech signal. The SVD-based technique works without initialization nor assumptions about a look direction, unlike the two-stage adaptive beamformer. Still, for different noise scenarios, the SVD-based technique performs as well as the two-stage adaptive beamformer, for a similar filter length and adaptation time for the filter coefficients. In a diffuse noise scenario, the SVD-based technique performs better than the two-stage adaptive beamformer and hence provides a more flexible and robust solution under speaker position variations and reverberant conditions.

[1]  Søren Holdt Jensen,et al.  FIR filter representations of reduced-rank noise reduction , 1998, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[2]  Michael W Callahan Acoustic signal processing based on the short‐time spectrum , 1976 .

[3]  Marc Moonen,et al.  SVD-based optimal filtering with applications to noise reduction in speech signals , 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics. WASPAA'99 (Cat. No.99TH8452).

[4]  H. Dillon,et al.  An international comparison of long‐term average speech spectra , 1994 .

[5]  Peter Søren Kirk Hansen,et al.  Signal subspace methods for speech enhancement , 1998 .

[6]  J M Kates Superdirective arrays for hearing aids , 1993, Proceedings of IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics.

[7]  J M Kates,et al.  A comparison of hearing-aid array processing techniques. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  P M Zurek,et al.  Evaluation of an adaptive beamforming method for hearing aids. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Michael S. Brandstein,et al.  Microphone Arrays - Signal Processing Techniques and Applications , 2001, Microphone Arrays.

[10]  J Vanden Berghe,et al.  An adaptive noise canceller for hearing aids using two nearby microphones. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  R. Plomp Noise, Amplification, and Compression: Considerations of Three Main Issues in Hearing Aid Design , 1994, Ear and hearing.

[12]  R. McAulay,et al.  Speech enhancement using a soft-decision noise suppression filter , 1980 .

[13]  H Levitt,et al.  A digital master hearing aid. , 1986, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[14]  S. Thomas Alexander,et al.  Adaptive Signal Processing , 1986, Texts and Monographs in Computer Science.

[15]  D J Van Tasell,et al.  Robust adaptive microphone array processing for hearing aids: realistic speech enhancement. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  W Soede,et al.  Assessment of a directional microphone array for hearing-impaired listeners. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  S. Haykin,et al.  Adaptive Filter Theory , 1986 .

[18]  J M Kates,et al.  Speech intelligibility enhancement using hearing-aid array processing. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  L. J. Griffiths,et al.  An alternative approach to linearly constrained adaptive beamforming , 1982 .

[20]  Jan Wouters,et al.  Adaptive noise suppression for a dual-microphone hearing aid: Supresión adaptativa del ruido para un auxiliar auditivo con micrófono dual , 2002, International journal of audiology.

[21]  Harald Sander,et al.  The Production of a Spatially Limited 'Diffuse' Sound Field in an Anechoic Room , 1987 .

[22]  A. M. Mimpen,et al.  Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. , 1979, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[23]  Marc Moonen,et al.  A multichannel subband GSVD based approach for speech enhancement in hearing aids , 2001 .

[24]  V. M. A. Peutz Articulation Loss of Consonants as a Criterion for Speech Transmission in a Room , 1971 .

[25]  Jan Wouters,et al.  Vlaamse opname van woordenlijsten voor spraakaudiometrie , 1994 .

[26]  W A Dreschler,et al.  Advantages of directional hearing aid microphones related to room acoustics. , 1991, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[27]  A.V. Oppenheim,et al.  Enhancement and bandwidth compression of noisy speech , 1979, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[28]  P. Peterson,et al.  Intelligibility-weighted measures of speech-to-interference ratio and speech system performance. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  Patrick Mangan. Peterson Adaptive array processing for multiple microphone hearing aids , 1989 .

[30]  D B Hawkins,et al.  Signal-to-noise ratio advantage of binaural hearing aids and directional microphones under different levels of reverberation. , 1984, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[31]  Dirk Van Compernolle,et al.  Switching adaptive filters for enhancing noisy and reverberant speech from microphone array recordings , 1990, ICASSP.