Modified Pfirrmann Grading System for Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Degeneration

Study Design. A reliability study was conducted. Objective. To modify a grading system for lumbar disc degeneration and to test the reliability of this modified grading system. Summary of Background Data. The 5-level Pfirrmann grading system for disc degeneration did not prove discriminatory when used to assess disc degeneration in the elderly spine. Such discriminatory power is necessary to test the association between other variables and severity of disc degeneration. Methods. An 8-level modified grading system for lumbar disc degeneration was developed including a description of the changes expected for each grade and a 24-image reference panel. The reliability of the modified grading system was tested on 260 lumbar intervertebral discs in 52 subjects (26 men, 26 female) with a mean age of 73 years (range, 67–83 years). All examinations were analyzed independently by 3 readers. Intraobserver and interobserver reliabilities were assessed by calculating weighted kappa statistics. Results. On average, for all 3 readers, 0.39% of the 260 discs were classified as Grade 2, 22% were classified as Grade 3, 21.5% were classified as Grade 4, 25.3% were classified as Grade 5, 19.1% were classified as Grade 6, 7.1% were classified as Grade 7, and 4.8% were classified as Grade 8. Intraobserver agreement was excellent (weighted kappa range, 0.79–0.91) with substantial interobserver agreement (weighted kappa range, 0.65–0.67). Complete intraobserver agreement was obtained, on average, in 85% of all discs with 84% of disagreement being as a result of a 1 grade difference. Complete interobserver agreement was obtained, on average, in 66% of all discs with 91% of disagreement being as a result of a 1 grade difference. Conclusion. The modified Pfirrmann grading system is useful at discriminating severity of disc degeneration in elderly subjects. The system can be applied with good intra- and interobserver agreement.

[1]  A. Borthakur,et al.  In vivo quantification of human lumbar disc degeneration using T1ρ-weighted magnetic resonance imaging , 2006, European Spine Journal.

[2]  M. Modic,et al.  The intranuclear cleft of the intervertebral disk: magnetic resonance imaging. , 1985, Radiology.

[3]  J. Niinimäki,et al.  The Treatment of Disc Herniation-Induced Sciatica With Infliximab: One-Year Follow-up Results of FIRST II, a Randomized Controlled Trial , 2006, Spine.

[4]  Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine. , 1994 .

[5]  J. P. Thompson,et al.  Preliminary Evaluation of a Scheme for Grading the Gross Morphology of the Human Intervertebral Disc , 1990, Spine.

[6]  L E Gibbons,et al.  Observer Variability in the Assessment of Disc Degeneration on Magnetic Resonance Images of the Lumbar and Thoracic Spine , 1995, Spine.

[7]  Keita Ito,et al.  Correlation of radiographic and MRI parameters to morphological and biochemical assessment of intervertebral disc degeneration , 2005, European Spine Journal.

[8]  J. Bolton,et al.  A Cross-Sectional Study Correlating Lumbar Spine Degeneration With Disability and Pain , 2000, Spine.

[9]  P. Brinckmann,et al.  Vertebral height, disc height, posteroanterior displacement and dens-atlas gap in the cervical spine: precision measurement protocol and normal data. , 2002, Clinical biomechanics.

[10]  J. Hodler,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Lumbar Spine: Findings in Female Subjects From Administrative and Nursing Professions , 2006, Spine.

[11]  A. Holmes,et al.  Gradient Echo MRI Characterization of Development of Atherosclerosis in the Abdominal Aorta in Watanabe Heritable Hyperlipidemic Rabbits , 2006, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[12]  M Kormano,et al.  Disc degeneration in magnetic resonance imaging. A comparative biochemical, histologic, and radiologic study in cadaver spines. , 1991, Spine.

[13]  W. Hutton,et al.  The stages of disc degeneration as revealed by discograms. , 1986, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[14]  L. Manchikanti.  Epidemiology of low back pain. , 2000, Pain physician.

[15]  M. Zlatkin,et al.  Normal and degenerated intervertebral disk: in vivo and in vitro MR imaging with histopathologic correlation. , 1991, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  C. Pfirrmann,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Classification of Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Degeneration , 2001, Spine.

[17]  M. Aebi,et al.  The human lumbar intervertebral disc: evidence for changes in the biosynthesis and denaturation of the extracellular matrix with growth, maturation, ageing, and degeneration. , 1996, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[18]  A. Mannion,et al.  Are “Structural Abnormalities” on Magnetic Resonance Imaging a Contraindication to the Successful Conservative Treatment of Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain? , 2006, Spine.

[19]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.