Beyond Automatic Motor Mapping: New Insights into Top-Down Modulations on Action Perception

Our ability to recognize other people’s actions is central to everyday life. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies have shown that observing an action induces activity in the observer’s motor system that replicates the muscle selectivity, direction and temporal profile of the observed movement when executed. This motor resonant activity has long been presumed to reflect an inner, automatic replica of the observed movement. However, recent empirical evidence has challenged this view by showing that motor resonance can be tuned to high-level features, such as the overarching goal and intention of the observed action, while being simultaneously influenced by top-down contextual factors. Interestingly, current predictive coding models provide a mechanistic account to explain how action recognition is achieved, stressing the role of prior expectations and the interplay of bottom-up and top-down processes in terms of matching and mismatching predictions across hierarchical levels of action representation. In this chapter, we first provide an overview of seminal TMS findings that point to the characterization of motor resonance as an automatic fine-grained simulation of the observed movement. Second, we discuss more recent sources of evidence supporting the notion of motor resonance as a flexible phenomenon, stressing the role of top-down modulations during action perception.

[1]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Motor facilitation during action observation: a magnetic stimulation study. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  C. Urgesi,et al.  Simulating the future of actions in the human corticospinal system. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[3]  U. Castiello,et al.  Kick with the finger: symbolic actions shape motor cortex excitability , 2015, The European journal of neuroscience.

[4]  Cosimo Urgesi,et al.  Contextual modulation of motor resonance during the observation of everyday actions , 2016, NeuroImage.

[5]  Nicole Wenderoth,et al.  Uncertainty in contextual and kinematic cues jointly modulate motor resonance in primary motor cortex , 2018, bioRxiv.

[6]  A. Hamilton,et al.  Reflecting on the mirror neuron system in autism: A systematic review of current theories , 2013, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience.

[7]  Emmanuele Tidoni,et al.  Action Simulation Plays a Critical Role in Deceptive Action Recognition , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  Nicholas P. Holmes,et al.  Effects of action observation on corticospinal excitability: Muscle specificity, direction, and timing of the mirror response , 2014, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  I Know What You Are Doing A Neurophysiological Study , 2001, Neuron.

[10]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  J. Pineda The functional significance of mu rhythms: Translating “seeing” and “hearing” into “doing” , 2005, Brain Research Reviews.

[12]  P. Ferrari,et al.  The mirror neuron system as revealed through neonatal imitation: presence from birth, predictive power and evidence of plasticity , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Predictive coding: an account of the mirror neuron system , 2007, Cognitive Processing.

[14]  C. Urgesi,et al.  Action anticipation and motor resonance in elite basketball players , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[15]  Paola Cesari,et al.  Fooling the kickers but not the goalkeepers: behavioral and neurophysiological correlates of fake action detection in soccer. , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[16]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Action recognition in the premotor cortex. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[17]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Activation of human primary motor cortex during action observation: a neuromagnetic study. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  L. Craighero,et al.  Human motor cortex excitability during the perception of others’ action , 2005, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[19]  Michael Inzlicht,et al.  Power changes how the brain responds to others. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[20]  Alexander Kraskov,et al.  M1 Corticospinal Mirror Neurons and Their Role in Movement Suppression during Action Observation , 2013, Current Biology.

[21]  Scott T Grafton,et al.  Direct mapping rather than motor prediction subserves modulation of corticospinal excitability during observation of actions in real time. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  C. Urgesi,et al.  Autistic traits predict poor integration between top-down contextual expectations and movement kinematics during action observation , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[23]  C. Keysers,et al.  Hebbian learning and predictive mirror neurons for actions, sensations and emotions , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  Salvatore Maria Aglioti,et al.  Somatotopic mapping of piano fingering errors in sensorimotor experts: TMS studies in pianists and visually trained musically naives. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[25]  L. Craighero,et al.  Equal kinematics and visual context but different purposes: Observer's moral rules modulate motor resonance , 2018, Cortex.

[26]  Luciano Fadiga,et al.  Force requirements of observed object lifting are encoded by the observer’s motor system: a TMS study , 2010, The European journal of neuroscience.

[27]  Afdc Hamilton,et al.  The motor hierarchy: from kinematics to goals and intentions , 2007 .

[28]  Cosimo Urgesi,et al.  Tracking the Time Course of Top-Down Contextual Effects on Motor Responses during Action Comprehension , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  Sukhvinder S. Obhi,et al.  Differential Motor Facilitation During Action Observation in Followers and Leaders on Instagram , 2019, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[30]  J. Pineda,et al.  Recognition of point-light biological motion: Mu rhythms and mirror neuron activity , 2007, Behavioural Brain Research.

[31]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Phase-specific modulation of cortical motor output during movement observation , 2001, Neuroreport.

[32]  Luciano Fadiga,et al.  Action observation effects reflect the modular organization of the human motor system , 2017, Cortex.

[33]  C. Urgesi,et al.  Dissociated Representations of Deceptive Intentions and Kinematic Adaptations in the Observer's Motor System , 2018, Cerebral cortex.

[34]  Cristina Becchio,et al.  Timecourse of mirror and counter-mirror effects measured with transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2013, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[35]  M. Candidi,et al.  Mapping Implied Body Actions in the Human Motor System , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  Cristina Becchio,et al.  Intentions in the Brain , 2015, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[37]  M. Sereno,et al.  Point-Light Biological Motion Perception Activates Human Premotor Cortex , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  L. Amoruso,et al.  Low or High-Level Motor Coding? The Role of Stimulus Complexity , 2019, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[39]  Umberto Castiello,et al.  Grasping with tools: corticospinal excitability reflects observed hand movements. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[40]  Patrice D. Tremoulet,et al.  Perception of Animacy from the Motion of a Single Object , 2000, Perception.

[41]  Salvatore Maria Aglioti,et al.  Empathy for pain and touch in the human somatosensory cortex. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[42]  Cosimo Urgesi,et al.  Conscious and Unconscious Representations of Observed Actions in the Human Motor System , 2014, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[43]  N. Bolognini,et al.  Grasping with the foot: Goal and motor expertise in action observation , 2014, Human brain mapping.

[44]  T. Pozzo,et al.  Generalization of motor resonance during the observation of hand, mouth, and eye movements. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.

[45]  T. J. Clarke,et al.  The Perception of Emotion from Body Movement in Point-Light Displays of Interpersonal Dialogue , 2005, Perception.

[46]  F. Baldissera,et al.  Excitability changes in human corticospinal projections to muscles moving hand and fingers while viewing a reaching and grasping action , 2005, The European journal of neuroscience.

[47]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Motor facilitation while observing hand actions: specificity of the effect and role of observer's orientation. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[48]  Silvio Ionta,et al.  Virtual lesion of ventral premotor cortex impairs visual perception of biomechanically possible but not impossible actions , 2008, Social neuroscience.

[49]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[50]  C. Urgesi,et al.  Contextual priors do not modulate action prediction in children with autism , 2019, Proceedings of the Royal Society B.

[51]  Scott T Grafton,et al.  The Relative Influence of Goal and Kinematics on Corticospinal Excitability Depends on the Information Provided to the Observer. , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[52]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Impaired motor facilitation during action observation in individuals with autism spectrum disorder , 2005, Current Biology.

[53]  Stefano Facchini,et al.  Motor facilitation of the human cortico-spinal system during observation of bio-mechanically impossible movements , 2005, NeuroImage.

[54]  Luigi Cattaneo,et al.  Bottom-up and top-down visuomotor responses to action observation. , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[55]  F. Tremblay,et al.  Corticomotor facilitation associated with observation, imagery and imitation of hand actions: a comparative study in young and old adults , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[56]  C. Heyes Where do mirror neurons come from? , 2010, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[57]  T. Paus,et al.  Modulation of cortical excitability during action observation: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study , 2000, Neuroreport.

[58]  S. Swinnen,et al.  Observing how others lift light or heavy objects: Which visual cues mediate the encoding of muscular force in the primary motor cortex? , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[59]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Modulation of premotor mirror neuron activity during observation of unpredictable grasping movements , 2004, The European journal of neuroscience.

[60]  N. Rinehart,et al.  Interpersonal motor resonance in autism spectrum disorder: evidence against a global “mirror system” deficit , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[61]  Salvatore Maria Aglioti,et al.  Harm avoiders suppress motor resonance to observed immoral actions. , 2015, Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience.

[62]  Luciano Fadiga,et al.  Effect of weight-related labels on corticospinal excitability during observation of grasping: a TMS study , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[63]  James M. Kilner,et al.  More than one pathway to action understanding , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[64]  Bert Steenbergen,et al.  Anticipatory planning reveals segmentation of cortical motor output during action observation. , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[65]  Cosimo Urgesi,et al.  Compensatory plasticity in the action observation network: virtual lesions of STS enhance anticipatory simulation of seen actions. , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[66]  H. Théoret,et al.  The mirror neuron system: grasping others' actions from birth? , 2007, Developmental science.

[67]  Umberto Castiello,et al.  When emulation becomes reciprocity. , 2013, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[68]  Luciano Fadiga,et al.  Movement kinematics drive chain selection toward intention detection , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[69]  Arne D. Ekstrom,et al.  Single-Neuron Responses in Humans during Execution and Observation of Actions , 2010, Current Biology.

[70]  Luigi Cattaneo,et al.  Representation of Goal and Movements without Overt Motor Behavior in the Human Motor Cortex: A Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[71]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  The motor theory of social cognition: a critique , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[72]  Jeremy Hogeveen,et al.  Social Interaction Enhances Motor Resonance for Observed Human Actions , 2012, Journal of Neuroscience.

[73]  N. Rinehart,et al.  Mirror Neuron Activity Associated with Social Impairments but not Age in Autism Spectrum Disorder , 2012, Biological Psychiatry.

[74]  J. Mattingley,et al.  Brain regions with mirror properties: A meta-analysis of 125 human fMRI studies , 2012, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[75]  F. Baldissera,et al.  Cyclic time course of motor excitability modulation during the observation of a cyclic hand movement , 2005, Brain Research.

[76]  M. Candidi,et al.  Representation of body identity and body actions in extrastriate body area and ventral premotor cortex , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[77]  G. Johansson Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .

[78]  P. Holmes,et al.  Observation of an action with a congruent contextual background facilitates corticospinal excitability: A combined TMS and eye-tracking experiment , 2018, Neuropsychologia.