School Inputs, Household Substitution, and Test Scores

Empirical studies of the relationship between school inputs and test scores typically do not account for the fact that households will respond to changes in school inputs. This paper presents a dynamic household optimization model relating test scores to school and household inputs, and tests its predictions in two very different low-income country settings -- Zambia and India. The authors measure household spending changes and student test score gains in response to unanticipated as well as anticipated changes in school funding. Consistent with the optimization model, they find in both settings that households offset anticipated grants more than unanticipated grants. They also find that unanticipated school grants lead to significant improvements in student test scores but anticipated grants have no impact on test scores. The results suggest that naive estimates of public education spending on learning outcomes that do not account for optimal household responses are likely to be considerably biased if used to estimate parameters of an education production function.

[1]  Esther Duflo,et al.  School Governance, Teacher Incentives, and Pupil-Teacher Ratios: Experimental Evidence from Kenyan Primary Schools , 2012 .

[2]  K. Muralidharan.  WORKING DRAFT : COMMENTS WELCOME Long-Term Effects of Teacher Performance Pay : Experimental Evidence from India , 2011 .

[3]  A. Khwaja,et al.  Students Today, Teachers Tomorrow? Identifying Constraints on the Provision of Education , 2011 .

[4]  Cristian Pop-Eleches,et al.  Going to a Better School: Effects and Behavioral Responses , 2011 .

[5]  K. Muralidharan,et al.  School Inputs, Household Substitution, and Test Scores. NBER Working Paper No. 16830. , 2011 .

[6]  Joseph P. Kaboski,et al.  A Structural Evaluation of a Large-Scale Quasi-Experimental Microfinance Initiative , 2008, Econometrica : journal of the Econometric Society.

[7]  Lars Lefgren,et al.  The Persistence of Teacher-Induced Learning , 2010, The Journal of Human Resources.

[8]  Karthik Muralidharan,et al.  *The Impact of Diagnostic Feedback to Teachers on Student Learning: Experimental Evidence from India , 2010 .

[9]  T. Mroz,et al.  Maternal Employment, Migration, and Child Development. , 2010, Journal of Econometrics.

[10]  Tristan Zajonc,et al.  Do Value-Added Estimates Add Value? Accounting for Learning Dynamics , 2009 .

[11]  Jonathan Haughton,et al.  Does the Village Fund Matter in Thailand? , 2009 .

[12]  M. Urquiola,et al.  Class-Size Caps, Sorting, and the Regression-Discontinuity Design , 2009 .

[13]  Esther Duflo,et al.  Peer Effects, Teacher Incentives, and the Impact of Tracking: Evidence from a Randomized Evaluation in Kenya , 2008 .

[14]  Jesse Rothstein,et al.  Teacher Quality in Educational Production: Tracking, Decay, and Student Achievement , 2008 .

[15]  Lars Lefgren,et al.  WORKING PAPER SERIES THE PERSISTENCE OF TEACHER-INDUCED LEARNING GAINS , 2008 .

[16]  Andrew J. Houtenville,et al.  Parental Effort, School Resources, and Student Achievement , 2008, The Journal of Human Resources.

[17]  P. Glewwe,et al.  Many Children Left Behind? Textbooks and Test Scores in Kenya , 2007 .

[18]  M. Urquiola,et al.  Identifying Class Size Effects in Developing Countries: Evidence from Rural Bolivia , 2006, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[19]  Karthik Muralidharan,et al.  TEACHER ABSENCE IN INDIA: A SNAPSHOT , 2005 .

[20]  P. Glewwe,et al.  Schools, Teachers, and Education Outcomes in Developing Countries Second Draft of Chapter for Handbook on the Economics of Education , 2005 .

[21]  R. Reinikka,et al.  Local Capture: Evidence from a Central Government Transfer Program in Uganda , 2004 .

[22]  Petra E. Todd,et al.  On the Specification and Estimation of the Production Function for Cognitive Achievement , 2003 .

[23]  David H. Autor,et al.  The Rise in the Disability Rolls and the Decline in Unemployment , 2003 .

[24]  Hanan G. Jacoby.  Is There an Intrahousehold 'Flypaper Effect'? Evidence from a School Feeding Programme , 2002 .

[25]  Hinh T. Dinh,et al.  The Impact of Cash Budgets on Poverty Reduction in Zambia: A Case Study of the Conflict between Well-Intentioned Macroeconomic Policy and Service Delivery to the Poor , 2002 .

[26]  E. Hanushek,et al.  The Failure of Input-Based Schooling Policies , 2002 .

[27]  P. Glewwe,et al.  Schools and Skills in Developing Countries: Education Policies and Socioeconomic Outcomes , 2002 .

[28]  E. Hanushek,et al.  Efficiency and Equity in Schools Around the World , 2002 .

[29]  E. Hanushek,et al.  Publicly Provided Education , 2002 .

[30]  S. Dercon,et al.  In Sickness and in Health: Risk Sharing within Households in Rural Ethiopia , 2000, Journal of Political Economy.

[31]  Angus Deaton,et al.  School Inputs and Educational Outcomes in South Africa , 1999 .

[32]  S. Walker,et al.  Nutrition and education: a randomized trial of the effects of breakfast in rural primary school children. , 1998, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[33]  Deon Filmer,et al.  What Educational Production Functions Really Show: A Positive Theory of Education Spending , 1997 .

[34]  Hanan G. Jacoby,et al.  Risk, Financial Markets, and Human Capital in a Developing Country , 1997 .

[35]  D. Cutler,et al.  The effect of Medicaid expansions on public insurance, private insurance, and redistribution. , 1996, The American economic review.

[36]  Jeffrey B. Liebman,et al.  Labor Supply Response to the Earned Income Tax Credit , 1995 .

[37]  A. Foster.  Prices, Credit Markets and Child Growth in Low-Income Rural Areas , 1995 .

[38]  Bruce D. Meyer.  Unemployment Insurance and Unemployment Spells , 1988 .

[39]  George A. Akerlof.  Labor Contracts as Partial Gift Exchange , 1982 .

[40]  J. Muellbauer,et al.  Economics and consumer behavior , 1980 .

[41]  R. Hall.  Stochastic Implications of the Life Cycle-Permanent Income Hypothesis: Theory and Evidence , 1978, Journal of Political Economy.

[42]  Gary S. Becker,et al.  Child Endowments and the Quantity and Quality of Children , 1976, Journal of Political Economy.