The emergence of team helping norms: Foundations within members' attributes and behavior

Summary This research examined the antecedents of organizational citizenship behavior helping norms in teams, specifically with regard to how members' personality, values, beliefs, and helping behavior predict the emergence of helping norms in newly formed project teams. We drew from theory on emergent phenomena and team composition research to propose and test a compilation model of how helping norms are influenced by having at least one member with particularly low (minimum) or high (maximum) levels of attributes that may influence helping-norm development (i.e., conscientiousness, agreeableness, other-oriented values, personal helping beliefs). We further examined the extent to which members' helping behaviors, as rated by peers, predicted helping norms and whether these behaviors mediated the relationship between individual attributes and helping norms. The results of a longitudinal study of 47 student project teams revealed that teams' minimums on agreeableness, other-oriented values, and personal helping beliefs had direct relationships with helping-norm emergence, and the effects of agreeableness were mediated through mean helping behavior. By contrast, teams' maximums on these attributes showed no relationships with helping norms, and only a team maximum on agreeableness was associated with teams' mean helping behavior. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  M. Audrey Korsgaard,et al.  The role of other orientation in organizational citizenship behavior , 2008 .

[2]  Elizabeth C. Ravlin,et al.  Individual Values in Organizations: Concepts, Controversies, and Research , 1998 .

[3]  M. Konovsky,et al.  Citizenship Behavior and Social Exchange , 1994 .

[4]  Daniel J. Koys.  The Effects of Employee Satisfaction, Organizational Citizenship Behavior, and Turnover on Organizational Effectiveness , 2001 .

[5]  Steve W. J. Kozlowski,et al.  AN EXPLORATION OF CLIMATES FOR TECHNICAL UPDATING AND PERFORMANCE , 1987 .

[6]  C. Pearce,et al.  Citizenship Behavior at the Team Level of Analysis: The Effects of Team Leadership, Team Commitment, Perceived Team Support, and Team Size , 2004, The Journal of social psychology.

[7]  Linda C. Angell,et al.  Personality Heterogeneity in Teams , 2003 .

[8]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[9]  Simon S. K. Lam,et al.  Instrumental values of organizational citizenship behavior for promotion: a field quasi-experiment. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[10]  Tjai M. Nielsen,et al.  Group Personality Composition and Group Effectiveness , 2005 .

[11]  Felix C. Brodbeck,et al.  Group diversity and group identification: The moderating role of diversity beliefs , 2008 .

[12]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  Astrid Schütz,et al.  Who are the people reluctant to participate in research? Personality correlates of four different types of nonresponse as inferred from self- and observer ratings. , 2005, Journal of personality.

[14]  Hettie A. Richardson,et al.  Integrating managerial perceptions and transformational leadership into a work‐unit level model of employee involvement , 2005 .

[15]  John M. Levine,et al.  Development of Strategic Norms in Groups , 2000 .

[16]  Charles R. Graham.  A Model of Norm Development for Computer-Mediated Teamwork , 2003 .

[17]  L. van Dyne,et al.  Antecedents and Performance Consequences of Helping Behavior in Work Groups , 2005 .

[18]  Robert B. Cialdini,et al.  Descriptive Social Norms as Underappreciated Sources of Social Control , 2007 .

[19]  D. C. Feldman,et al.  The Development and Enforcement of Group Norms , 1984 .

[20]  R. Hastie,et al.  The Logic of Social Sharing: An Evolutionary Game Analysis of Adaptive Norm Development , 2003, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[21]  Mark A. Griffin,et al.  Group Task Satisfaction , 2005 .

[22]  L. W. Lam,et al.  Effects of trusting and being trusted on team citizenship behaviours in chain stores , 2008 .

[23]  S. Harkins,et al.  Equity in effort: An explanation of the social loafing effect. , 1985 .

[24]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors , 1990 .

[25]  Mark G Ehrhart,et al.  Organizational citizenship behavior in work groups: a group norms approach. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[26]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[27]  Suzanne T Bell,et al.  Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: a meta-analysis. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[28]  P. Costa,et al.  Adding Liebe und Arbeit: The Full Five-Factor Model and Well-Being , 1991 .

[29]  Jin Nam Choi.  Collective Dynamics of Citizenship Behaviour: What Group Characteristics Promote Group-Level Helping? , 2009 .

[30]  Ronald F. Piccolo,et al.  A META‐ANALYSIS OF TEAMWORK PROCESSES: TESTS OF A MULTIDIMENSIONAL MODEL AND RELATIONSHIPS WITH TEAM EFFECTIVENESS CRITERIA , 2008 .

[31]  Maria Lewicka,et al.  Positive‐negative asymmetry or ‘When the heart needs a reason’ , 1992 .

[32]  Daniel J. McAllister,et al.  Disentangling role perceptions: how perceived role breadth, discretion, instrumentality, and efficacy relate to helping and taking charge. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[33]  P. Costa,et al.  Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: robust and surprising findings. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[34]  B. Schneider.  THE PEOPLE MAKE THE PLACE , 1987 .

[35]  S. Grover,et al.  Does one good turn deserve another? coworker influences on employee citizenship , 2003 .

[36]  James M. LeBreton,et al.  Answers to 20 Questions About Interrater Reliability and Interrater Agreement , 2008 .

[37]  Donal E. Carlston,et al.  Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. , 1989 .

[38]  S. Schwartz,et al.  The Big Five Personality Factors and Personal Values , 2002 .

[39]  Daniel G. Bachrach,et al.  Tolerance of free-riding: The effects of defection size, defection pattern, and social orientation in a repeated public goods dilemma , 2003 .

[40]  A. Somech,et al.  Exploring organizational citizenship behaviour from an organizational perspective: The relationship between organizational learning and organizational citizenship behaviour , 2004 .

[41]  D. Organ,et al.  A META-ANALYTIC REVIEW OF ATTITUDINAL AND DISPOSITIONAL PREDICTORS OF ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR , 1995 .

[42]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Backing up behaviors in teams: the role of personality and legitimacy of need. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[43]  J. Levine,et al.  Progress in Small Group Research , 1990 .

[44]  D. Hofmann,et al.  The Structure and Function of Collective Constructs: Implications for Multilevel Research and Theory Development , 1999 .

[45]  L. James,et al.  Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. , 1984 .

[46]  R. H. Moorman,et al.  Individualism‐collectivism as an individual difference predictor of organizational citizenship behavior , 1995 .

[47]  Raymond A. Noe,et al.  JUSTICE IN TEAMS: ANTECEDENTS AND CONSEQUENCES OF PROCEDURAL JUSTICE CLIMATE , 2002 .

[48]  H. V. Emmerik,et al.  Leadership styles and group organizational citizenship behavior across cultures , 2007 .

[49]  M. Audrey Korsgaard,et al.  The Effect of Other-Oriented Values on Decision Making: A Test of Propositions of a Theory of Concern for Others in Organizations☆ , 1996 .

[50]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. , 1998 .

[51]  Mark G Ehrhart,et al.  Leadership and Procedural Justice Climate as Antecedents of Unit-Level Organizational Citizenship Behavior. , 2004 .

[52]  Mary Bardes,et al.  How low does ethical leadership flow? Test of a trickle-down model , 2009 .

[53]  S. Schwartz,et al.  Values and personality , 1994 .

[54]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Organizational Citizenship Behavior and the Quantity and Quality of Work Group Performance , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.

[55]  Paul E. Levy,et al.  The Importance of Instrumentality Beliefs in the Prediction of Organizational Citizenship Behaviors , 2001 .

[56]  Louis A. Penner,et al.  The causes of organizational citizenship behavior: a motivational analysis. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[57]  Mel Schnake,et al.  Levels of measurement and analysis issues in organizational citizenship behaviour research , 2003 .

[58]  Stephen H. Wagner,et al.  The Relationship between Work-Team Personality Composition and the Job Performance of Teams , 1999 .

[59]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  IMPACT OF ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR ON ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE: A REVIEW AND SUGGESTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH , 1997 .

[60]  Susan S. White,et al.  Linking service climate and customer perceptions of service quality: test of a causal model. , 1998, The Journal of applied psychology.

[61]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[62]  P. Shrout,et al.  Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[63]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Effects of individual differences on the performance of hierarchical decision-making teams : Much more than g , 1997 .

[64]  Tjai M. Nielsen,et al.  Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Performance , 2009 .

[65]  Walter C. Borman,et al.  Personality predictors of citizenship performance , 2001 .

[66]  Terence R. Mitchell,et al.  How, When, and Why Bad Apples Spoil the Barrel: Negative Group Members and Dysfunctional Groups , 2006 .

[67]  Lisa M. Finkelstein,et al.  Organizational citizenship behavior and gender: Expectations and attributions for performance. , 2007 .

[68]  Gregory M. Hurtz,et al.  Personality and job performance: the Big Five revisited. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[69]  Paul D. Bliese,et al.  Unit-Level OCB and Unit Effectiveness: Examining the Incremental Effect of Helping Behavior , 2006 .

[70]  K. Vohs,et al.  Case Western Reserve University , 1990 .

[71]  S. Schwartz,et al.  Toward A Universal Psychological Structure of Human Values , 1987 .

[72]  D. Chan.  Functional Relations among Constructs in the Same Content Domain at Different Levels of Analysis: A Typology of Composition Models , 1998 .

[73]  Elizabeth C. Ravlin,et al.  The transitivity of work values: Hierarchical preference ordering of socially desirable stimuli , 1989 .

[74]  D. Schroeder,et al.  Justice Within Social Dilemmas , 2003, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[75]  David P Mackinnon,et al.  Confidence Limits for the Indirect Effect: Distribution of the Product and Resampling Methods , 2004, Multivariate behavioral research.

[76]  J. George,et al.  Understanding prosocial behavior, sales performance, and turnover: A group-level analysis in a service context. , 1990 .

[77]  Daniel G. Bachrach,et al.  Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: A Critical Review of the Theoretical and Empirical Literature and Suggestions for Future Research , 2000 .

[78]  M. Audrey Korsgaard,et al.  BEYOND HELPING: DO OTHER-ORIENTED VALUES HAVE BROADER IMPLICATIONS IN ORGANIZATIONS? , 1997 .

[79]  Brian D. Blume,et al.  Individual- and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.