Correcting the radar rainfall forcing of a hydrological model with data assimilation: application to flood forecasting in the Lez catchment in Southern France

The present study explores the application of a data assimilation (DA) procedure to correct the radar rainfall inputs of an event-based, distributed, parsimonious hydrological model. An extended Kalman filter algorithm was built on top of a rainfall-runoff model in order to assimilate discharge observations at the catchment outlet. This work focuses primarily on the uncertainty in the rainfall data and considers this as the principal source of error in the simulated discharges, neglecting simplifications in the hydrological model structure and poor knowledge of catchment physics. The study site is the 114 km 2 Lez catchment near Montpellier, France. This catchment is subject to heavy orographic rainfall and characterised by a karstic geology, leading to flash flooding events. The hydrological model uses a derived version of the SCS method, combined with a Lag and Route transfer function. Because the radar rainfall input to the model depends on geographical features and cloud structures, it is particularly uncertain and results in significant errors in the simulated discharges. This study seeks to demonstrate that a simple DA algorithm is capable of rendering radar rainfall suitable for hydrological forecasting. To test this hypothesis, the DA analysis was applied to estimate a constant hyetograph correction to each of 19 flood events. The analysis was carried in two different modes: by assimilating observations at all available time steps, referred to here as reanalysis mode, and by using only observations up to 3 h before the flood peak to mimic an operational environment, referred to as pseudo-forecast mode. In reanalysis mode, the resulting correction of the radar rainfall data was then compared to the mean field bias (MFB), a corrective coefficient determined using rain gauge measurements. It was shown that the radar rainfall corrected using DA leads to improved discharge simulations and Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency criteria compared to the MFB correction. In pseudo-forecast mode, the reduction of the uncertainty in the rainfall data leads to a reduction of the error in the simulated discharge, but uncertainty from the model parameterisation diminishes data assimilation efficiency. While the DA algorithm used is this study is effective in correcting uncertain radar rainfall, model uncertainty remains an important challenge for flood forecasting within the Lez catchment.

[1]  Doerthe Tetzlaff,et al.  Significance of spatial variability in precipitation for process-oriented modelling: results from two nested catchments using radar and ground station data , 2005 .

[2]  Robert J. Moore,et al.  Hydrological modelling using raingauge- and radar-based estimators of areal rainfall , 2008 .

[3]  Dong-Jun Seo,et al.  Real-time estimation of mean field bias in radar rainfall data , 1999 .

[4]  Hélène Roux,et al.  A physically-based parsimonious hydrological model for flash floods in Mediterranean catchments , 2011 .

[5]  D. Maidment,et al.  UNIT HYDROGRAPH DERIVED FROM A SPATIALLY DISTRIBUTED VELOCITY FIELD , 1996 .

[6]  B. Boudevillain,et al.  The Cévennes‐Vivarais Mediterranean Hydrometeorological Observatory database , 2011 .

[7]  Cindy Lebeaupin,et al.  A numerical study of three catastrophic precipitating events over southern France. I: Numerical framework and synoptic ingredients , 2008 .

[8]  Keith Beven,et al.  Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology , 2001 .

[9]  Gabrielle De Lannoy,et al.  Ensemble‐based assimilation of discharge into rainfall‐runoff models: A comparison of approaches to mapping observational information to state space , 2009 .

[10]  T. I. Eldho,et al.  An advanced soil moisture accounting procedure for SCS curve number method , 2007 .

[11]  David R. Maidment,et al.  Geographic Information Systems (GIS)‐based spatially distributed model for runoff routing , 1999 .

[12]  P. D. Batesa,et al.  A simple raster-based model for flood inundation simulation , 2000 .

[13]  Victor Koren,et al.  Runoff response to spatial variability in precipitation: an analysis of observed data , 2004 .

[14]  G. Thirel,et al.  A past discharges assimilation system for ensemble streamflow forecasts over France - Part 1: Description and validation of the assimilation system , 2010 .

[15]  Albert Tarantola,et al.  Inverse problem theory - and methods for model parameter estimation , 2004 .

[16]  Philip B. Bedient,et al.  Assessing urban hydrologic prediction accuracy through event reconstruction , 2004 .

[17]  P. Tabary,et al.  The New French Operational Radar Rainfall Product. Part I: Methodology , 2007 .

[18]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Dual state-parameter estimation of hydrological models using ensemble Kalman filter , 2005 .

[19]  V. Pauwels,et al.  Improvement of the PEST parameter estimation algorithm through Extended Kalman Filtering , 2007 .

[20]  D. McLaughlin,et al.  A Reassessment of the Groundwater Inverse Problem , 1996 .

[21]  Ashish Sharma,et al.  Correcting of real-time radar rainfall bias using a Kalman filtering approach , 2006 .

[22]  James W. Wilson,et al.  Radar Measurement of Rainfall—A Summary , 1979 .

[23]  Hervé Andrieu,et al.  Evaluation of the new French operational weather radar product for the field of urban hydrology , 2012 .

[24]  C. Gueguen,et al.  The New French Operational Radar Rainfall Product. Part II: Validation , 2007 .

[25]  W. Crow.  Correcting Land Surface Model Predictions for the Impact of Temporally Sparse Rainfall Rate Measurements Using an Ensemble Kalman Filter and Surface Brightness Temperature Observations , 2003 .

[26]  Florence Habets,et al.  Analysis of Near-Surface Atmospheric Variables: Validation of the SAFRAN Analysis over France , 2008 .

[27]  Anne Johannet,et al.  Complexity selection of a neural network model for karst flood forecasting: The case of the Lez Basin (southern France) , 2011 .

[28]  Eric Gaume,et al.  Hydrological analysis of the river Aude, France, flash flood on 12 and 13 November 1999 , 2004 .

[29]  C. David,et al.  Reconstructing the Tropical Storm Ketsana flood event in Marikina River, Philippines , 2010 .

[30]  Wolfgang Kinzelbach,et al.  Hydrological real-time modelling in the Zambezi river basin using satellite-based soil moisture and rainfall data , 2011 .

[31]  A. Weerts,et al.  Particle filtering and ensemble Kalman filtering for state updating with hydrological conceptual rainfall‐runoff models , 2006 .

[32]  M. Coustau.  Contribution à la prévision des crues sur le bassin du Lez : modélisation de la relation pluie-débit en zone karstique et impact de l'assimilation de débits , 2011 .

[33]  Venkatesh Merwade,et al.  Implementation of surface soil moisture data assimilation with watershed scale distributed hydrological model , 2012 .

[34]  A. Piacentini,et al.  Correction of upstream flow and hydraulic state with data assimilation in the context of flood forecasting , 2010 .

[35]  H. Nachtnebel,et al.  Online updating procedures for a real-time hydrological forecasting system , 2008 .

[36]  S. K. Mishra,et al.  Validity and extension of the SCS‐CN method for computing infiltration and rainfall‐excess rates , 2004 .

[37]  Marco Borga,et al.  Accuracy of radar rainfall estimates for streamflow simulation , 2002 .

[38]  Sandrine Anquetin,et al.  The use of distributed hydrological models for the Gard 2002 flash flood event: analysis of associated hydrological processes. , 2010 .

[39]  Marco Borga,et al.  Which rainfall spatial information for flash flood response modelling? A numerical investigation based on data from the Carpathian range, Romania , 2010 .

[40]  Brice Boudevillain,et al.  Radar rainfall estimation in the context of post-event analysis of flash-flood events , 2009 .

[41]  Christophe Bouvier,et al.  Flood modelling with a distributed event-based parsimonious rainfall-runoff model: case of the karstic Lez river catchment , 2012 .

[42]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[43]  D. Aubert,et al.  Sequential assimilation of soil moisture and streamflow data in a conceptual rainfall-runoff model , 2003 .

[44]  P. Ayral,et al.  Impact of rainfall spatial distribution on rainfall-runoff modelling efficiency and initial soil moisture conditions estimation , 2011 .

[45]  D. McLaughlin,et al.  Hydrologic Data Assimilation with the Ensemble Kalman Filter , 2002 .

[46]  C. Diks,et al.  Improved treatment of uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: Combining the strengths of global optimization and data assimilation , 2005 .

[47]  Julien Lhomme,et al.  Applying a GIS-based geomorphological routing model in urban catchments , 2004 .

[48]  Georges-Marie Saulnier,et al.  Hydrologic Visibility of Weather Radar Systems Operating in Mountainous Regions: Case Study for the Ardèche Catchment (France) , 2002 .

[49]  Niko E. C. Verhoest,et al.  The importance of the spatial patterns of remotely sensed soil moisture in the improvement of discharge predictions for small-scale basins through data assimilation , 2001 .

[50]  Sandrine Anquetin,et al.  Sensitivity of the hydrological response to the variability of rainfall fields and soils for the Gard 2002 flash-flood event , 2010 .

[51]  H. Jourde,et al.  Modelling the hydrologic functions of a karst aquifer under active water management – The Lez spring , 2009 .

[52]  Patrick Matgen,et al.  Calibration and sequential updating of a coupled hydrologic-hydraulic model using remote sensing-derived water stages , 2008 .