Temporal Autocorrelation Can Enhance the Persistence and Abundance of Metapopulations Comprised of Coupled Sinks

In spatially heterogeneous landscapes, some habitats may be persistent sources, providing immigrants to sustain populations in unfavorable sink habitats (where extinction is inevitable without immigration). Recent theoretical and empirical studies of source‐sink systems demonstrate that temporally variable local growth rates in sinks can substantially increase average abundance of a persisting population, provided that the variation is positively autocorrelated—in effect, temporal variation inflates average abundance. Here we extend these results to a metapopulation in which all habitat patches are sinks. Using numerical studies of a population with discrete generations (buttressed by analytic results), we show that temporal variation and moderate dispersal can jointly permit indefinite persistence of the metapopulation and that positive autocorrelation both lowers the magnitude of variation required for persistence and increases the average abundance of persisting metapopulations. These effects are weakened—but not destroyed—if variation in local growth rates is spatially synchronized and dispersal is localized. We show that the inflationary effect is robust to a number of extensions of the basic model, including demographic stochasticity and density dependence. Because ecological and environmental processes contributing to temporally variable growth rates in natural populations are typically autocorrelated, these observations may have important implications for species persistence.

[1]  P. Foley,et al.  Predicting Extinction Times from Environmental Stochasticity and Carrying Capacity , 1994 .

[2]  Alan Hastings,et al.  Spatial mechanisms for coexistence of species sharing a common natural enemy. , 2003, Theoretical population biology.

[3]  J. Gamarra,et al.  Metapopulation Ecology , 2007 .

[4]  D. Saupe Algorithms for random fractals , 1988 .

[5]  S. Levin,et al.  The Ecology and Evolution of Seed Dispersal: A Theoretical Perspective , 2003 .

[6]  Richard L. Smith,et al.  Anthropogenic influence on the autocorrelation structure of hemispheric-mean temperatures , 1998, Science.

[7]  Shripad Tuljapurkar,et al.  Population dynamics in variable environments. III. Evolutionary dynamics of r-selection , 1982 .

[8]  Andrew D. Taylor,et al.  Empirical Evidence for Metapopulation Dynamics , 1997 .

[9]  Arturo H. Ariño,et al.  On the nature of population extremes , 1995, Evolutionary Ecology.

[10]  Mark E. Ritchie,et al.  Populations in a Landscape Context: Sources, Sinks, and Metapopulations , 1997 .

[11]  A. Hastings,et al.  The Effects of Small Dispersal Rates on Extinction Times in Structured Metapopulation Models , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[12]  P. Chesson General theory of competitive coexistence in spatially-varying environments. , 2000, Theoretical population biology.

[13]  C. Wissel,et al.  Extinction risk in a temporally correlated fluctuating environment. , 1997, Theoretical population biology.

[14]  B. Kendall,et al.  Dispersal, Environmental Correlation, and Spatial Synchrony in Population Dynamics , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[15]  D. Tilman Competition and Biodiversity in Spatially Structured Habitats , 1994 .

[16]  J. Mcglade,et al.  The role of memory in ecological systems , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  V. Vatutin,et al.  Establishment success and extinction risk in autocorrelated environments. , 2003, Theoretical population biology.

[18]  Robert D. Holt,et al.  On the evolutionary stability of sink populations , 1997, Evolutionary Ecology.

[19]  Anthony W. King,et al.  Analysis of landscape sources and sinks: the effect of spatial pattern on avian demography , 2001 .

[20]  Hans Rott Coherence and Conservatism in the Dynamics of Belief II: Iterated Belief Change without Dispositional Coherence , 2003, J. Log. Comput..

[21]  P. Inchausti,et al.  Investigating long-term ecological variability using the Global Population Dynamics Database. , 2001, Science.

[22]  Owen L. Petchey,et al.  Environmental colour affects aspects of single–species population dynamics , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  John M McNamara,et al.  A Unifying Framework for Metapopulation Dynamics , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[24]  Scott K. Robinson,et al.  SOURCE-SINK POPULATION DYNAMICS MAY COMPLICATE THE INTERPRETATION OF LONG-TERM CENSUS DATA' , 1996 .

[25]  S. Levin Dispersion and Population Interactions , 1974, The American Naturalist.

[26]  A. Ives,et al.  Food web dynamics in correlated and autocorrelated environments. , 2003, Theoretical population biology.

[27]  Per Lundberg,et al.  Noise colour and the risk of population extinctions , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[28]  Derek M. Johnson SOURCE–SINK DYNAMICS IN A TEMPORALLY HETEROGENEOUS ENVIRONMENT , 2004 .

[29]  M. Gillman,et al.  The variability of orchid population size , 1998 .

[30]  Andrew Gonzalez,et al.  The inflationary effects of environmental fluctuations in source–sink systems , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  R. Holt,et al.  Impacts of environmental variability in open populations and communities: "inflation" in sink environments. , 2003, Theoretical population biology.

[32]  T. Kawecki Ecological and Evolutionary Consequences of Source-Sink Population Dynamics , 2004 .

[33]  Oscar E. Gaggiotti,et al.  Ecology, genetics, and evolution of metapopulations , 2004 .

[34]  Peter Chesson,et al.  Predator-Prey Theory and Variability , 1978 .

[35]  M. Turelli Random environments and stochastic calculus. , 1977, Theoretical population biology.

[36]  Mark Rees,et al.  Effects of Temporal Variability on Rare Plant Persistence in Annual Systems , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[37]  John H. Steele,et al.  A comparison of terrestrial and marine ecological systems , 1985, Nature.

[38]  O. Hoegh‐Guldberg,et al.  Ecological responses to recent climate change , 2002, Nature.

[39]  R. Holt Population dynamics in two-patch environments: Some anomalous consequences of an optimal habitat distribution , 1985 .

[40]  S. Ellner,et al.  Cholera dynamics and El Niño-Southern Oscillation. , 2000, Science.

[41]  R. Lande,et al.  MIGRATION AND SPATIOTEMPORAL VARIATION IN POPULATION DYNAMICS IN A HETEROGENEOUS ENVIRONMENT , 2002 .

[42]  Stuart L. Pimm,et al.  The variability of population densities , 1988, Nature.

[43]  M. Rotenberg Effect of certain stochastic parameters on extinction and harvested populations , 1987 .

[44]  R. Lewontin,et al.  On population growth in a randomly varying environment. , 1969, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  V. Jansen,et al.  Populations can persist in an environment consisting of sink habitats only. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[46]  A. Ives,et al.  The Synergistic Effects of Stochasticity and Dispersal on Population Densities , 2004, American Naturalist.

[47]  Andrew M. Liebhold,et al.  Spatial Synchrony in Population Dynamics , 2004 .

[48]  Charles J. Mode,et al.  On estimating critical population size for an endangered species in the presence of environmental stochasticity , 1987 .

[49]  H. Pulliam,et al.  Sources, Sinks, and Habitat Selection: A Landscape Perspective on Population Dynamics , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[50]  F. Messier,et al.  Assessment of source-sink theory for predicting demographic rates among habitats that exhibit temporal changes in quality , 2000 .

[51]  J. Halley Ecology, evolution and 1 f -noise. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[52]  R. Levins Some Demographic and Genetic Consequences of Environmental Heterogeneity for Biological Control , 1969 .

[53]  H. Pulliam,et al.  Sources, Sinks, and Population Regulation , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[54]  Charles J. Puccia,et al.  Qualitative Modeling of Complex Systems: An Introduction to Loop Analysis and Time Averaging , 1986 .

[55]  H. B. Wilson,et al.  Persistence and Area Effects in a Stochastic Tritrophic Model , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[56]  C. Both,et al.  Global Climate Change Leads to Mistimed Avian Reproduction , 2004 .

[57]  Jonathan Roughgarden,et al.  A Simple Model for Population Dynamics in Stochastic Environments , 1975, The American Naturalist.

[58]  Peter Chesson,et al.  Models for Spatially Distributed Populations: The Effect of Within-Patch Variability , 1981 .

[59]  T. Royama,et al.  Analytical Population Dynamics , 1994, Population and Community Biology Series.

[60]  T. Schoener Are Lizard Population Sizes Unusually Constant Through Time? , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[61]  Robert M. May,et al.  The spatial dynamics of host-parasitoid systems , 1992 .

[62]  Owen L. Petchey,et al.  Effects on population persistence: the interaction between environmental noise colour, intraspecific competition and space , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[63]  S. Bottani,et al.  Unexpected coherence and conservation , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[64]  M. Gilpin,et al.  Metapopulation dynamics: a brief his-tory and conceptual domain , 1991 .

[65]  H. Caswell,et al.  Red, white and blue: environmental variance spectra and coexistence in metapopulations , 1995 .

[66]  V. Kaitala,et al.  Red, blue and green : Dyeing population dynamics , 1997 .

[67]  R. Holt Models for Peripheral Populations: The Role of Immigration , 1983 .

[68]  S. Levin,et al.  Competitive coexistence in a dynamic landscape. , 2004, Theoretical population biology.

[69]  Frédéric Guichard,et al.  Mussel Disturbance Dynamics: Signatures of Oceanographic Forcing from Local Interactions , 2003, The American Naturalist.

[70]  I. Hanski,et al.  Migration, Metapopulation Dynamics and Fugitive Co-existence , 1993 .

[71]  G. Polis,et al.  Feast and famine in food webs: the effects of pulsed productivity , 2004 .