Surgical management of giant sphenoid wing meningiomas encasing major cerebral arteries.

OBJECTIVE Sphenoid wing meningiomas are a heterogeneous group of tumors with variable surgical risks and prognosis. Those that have grown to a very large size, encasing the major cerebral arteries, are associated with a high risk of stroke. In reviewing the authors' series of giant sphenoid wing meningiomas, the goal was to evaluate how the extent of the tumor's invasion of surrounding structures affected the ability to safely remove the tumor and restore function. METHODS The authors conducted a retrospective study of a series of giant sphenoid wing meningiomas operated on between 1996 and 2016. Inclusion criteria were meningiomas with a globoid component ≥ 6 cm, encasing at least 1 major intradural cerebral artery. Extent of resection was measured according to Simpson grade. RESULTS This series included 12 patients, with a mean age of 59 years. Visual symptoms were the most common clinical presentation. There was complete or partial encasement of all 3 major cerebral arteries except for 3 cases in which only the anterior cerebral artery was not involved. The lateral wall of the cavernous sinus was invaded in 8 cases (67%) and the optic canal in 6 (50%). Complete resection was achieved in 2 cases (Simpson grades 2 and 3). In the remaining 10 cases of partial resection (Simpson grade 4), radical removal (> 90%) was achieved in 7 cases (70%). In the immediate postoperative period, there were no deaths. Four of 9 patients with visual deficits improved, while the 5 others remained unchanged. Two patients experienced transient neurological deficits. Other than an asymptomatic lacuna of the internal capsule, there were no ischemic lesions following surgery. Tumor recurrence occurred in 5 patients, between 24 and 168 months (mean 61 months) following surgery. CONCLUSIONS Although these giant lesions encasing major cerebral arteries are particularly treacherous for surgery, this series demonstrates that it is possible to safely achieve radical removal and at times even gross-total resection. However, the risk of recurrence remains high and larger studies are needed to see if and how improvement can be achieved, whether in surgical technique or technological advances, and by determining the timing and modality of adjuvant radiation therapy.

[1]  Sameer H. Halani,et al.  Degree of Vascular Encasement in Sphenoid Wing Meningiomas Predicts Postoperative Ischemic Complications , 2017, Neurosurgery.

[2]  Rajneesh Kumar,et al.  Sphenoid Wing Meningioma Presenting as Cognitive Impairment , 2016, Shanghai archives of psychiatry.

[3]  A. Suri,et al.  Medial sphenoid wing meningiomas: Experience with microsurgical resection over 5 years and a review of literature. , 2016, Neurology India.

[4]  G. Zadeh,et al.  Predictors of response to Gamma Knife radiosurgery for intracranial meningiomas. , 2015, Journal of neurosurgery.

[5]  N. Zhang,et al.  Sphenoid wing meningiomas: Surgical strategies and evaluation of prognostic factors influencing clinical outcomes , 2015, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.

[6]  G. Harsh,et al.  Meningiomas of the Tuberculum and Diaphragma Sellae , 2014, Journal of Neurological Surgery—Part B.

[7]  S. Blond,et al.  Surgery followed by radiosurgery: A deliberate valuable strategy in the treatment of intracranial meningioma , 2014, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.

[8]  V. Seifert,et al.  Sphenoorbital meningiomas: surgical management and outcome , 2014, Neurological research.

[9]  B. De Bari,et al.  Role of external beam radiotherapy in the treatment of relapsing meningioma , 2014, Medical Oncology.

[10]  Samuel Barnett,et al.  The treatment of cavernous sinus meningiomas: evolution of a modern approach. , 2013, Neurosurgical focus.

[11]  M. Berger,et al.  Modern surgical outcomes following surgery for sphenoid wing meningiomas. , 2013, Journal of neurosurgery.

[12]  M. McDermott,et al.  Erratum: Association of morbidity with extent of resection and cavernous sinus invasion in sphenoid wing meningiomas (Skull Base DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1304562) , 2011 .

[13]  M. McDermott,et al.  Association of Morbidity with Extent of Resection and Cavernous Sinus Invasion in Sphenoid Wing Meningiomas , 2011, Skull Base.

[14]  J. Meixensberger,et al.  Meningiomas Involving the Sphenoid Wing Outcome after Microsurgical Treatment – A Clinical Review of 73 Cases , 2010, Central European neurosurgery.

[15]  S. Behari,et al.  Surgical strategies for giant medial sphenoid wing meningiomas: a new scoring system for predicting extent of resection , 2008, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[16]  H. Shih,et al.  Stereotactic radiation treatment for benign meningiomas. , 2007, Neurosurgical focus.

[17]  M. Samii,et al.  Medial Sphenoid Wing Meningiomas: Clinical Outcome and Recurrence Rate , 2006, Neurosurgery.

[18]  E. Dagnew,et al.  LARGE SPHENOID WING MENINGIOMAS INVOLVING THE CAVERNOUS SINUS: CONSERVATIVE SURGICAL STRATEGIES FOR BETTER FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES , 2004, Neurosurgery.

[19]  T. Fukushima,et al.  Management of vascular invasion during radical resection of medial sphenoid wing meningiomas. , 2001, Skull base : official journal of North American Skull Base Society ... [et al.].

[20]  M. Ishikawa,et al.  Predictability of internal carotid artery (ICA)dissectability in cases showing ICA involvement in parasellar meningioma , 2001, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[21]  J. Day,et al.  Cranial base surgical techniques for large sphenocavernous meningiomas: technical note. , 2000, Neurosurgery.

[22]  H. van Loveren,et al.  The surgical resectability of meningiomas of the cavernous sinus. , 1997, Neurosurgery.

[23]  L. Sekhar,et al.  Long-term follow-up of patients with meningiomas involving the cavernous sinus: recurrence, progression, and quality of life. , 1996, Neurosurgery.

[24]  A. Biglan,et al.  The results of surgery for benign tumors of the cavernous sinus. , 1995, Neurosurgery.

[25]  O. Al-Mefty,et al.  Outcome of aggressive removal of cavernous sinus meningiomas. , 1994, Journal of neurosurgery.

[26]  J. Brotchi,et al.  Invading meningiomas of the sphenoid ridge. , 1980, Journal of neurosurgery.

[27]  M. Sindou,et al.  Cavernous sinus meningiomas: imaging and surgical strategy. , 2015, Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery.

[28]  İ. Solmaz,et al.  Surgical strategies for the removal of sphenoorbital meningiomas. , 2014, Turkish neurosurgery.

[29]  S. Short,et al.  Controversies in radiotherapy for meningioma. , 2014, Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)).

[30]  I. Yang,et al.  The relevance of Simpson Grade I and II resection in modern neurosurgical treatment of World Health Organization Grade I meningiomas , 2011 .

[31]  O. al-Mefty,et al.  Clinoidal meningiomas. , 1991, Acta neurochirurgica. Supplementum.

[32]  H. Cushing,et al.  Meningiomas : their classification, regional behaviour, life history, and surgical end results , 1938 .