The influence of sow behaviour on piglet mortality due to crushing in an open farrowing system

The objectives of this study were to establish what changes in posture by sows carried a high risk of piglet crushing in a group farrowing system during early lactation and also to determine what factors influenced the risk of crushing during lying down. A total of 24 Large White ✕ Landrace sows were studied during the first 7 days of lactation in a group farrowing system. Cross-fostering was not carried out so as not to influence behaviour. Dead piglets were removed and cause of death ascertained from external observation and post-mortem examination. Sow and piglet behaviour was video-recorded continuously. A total of 268 piglets were born alive, with 67 liveborn piglets subsequently dying during the 7-day experimental period, 50 as a result of crushing. A total of 7425 posture changes were analysed and 11 types of posture change were identified, the most dangerous being lying down from standing and those involving swapping sides, or rolling over, whilst lying. Dangerous events during lying down were more likely to occur (1) in the first 24 h after farrowing, (2) when the sow lay down in the middle of the pen, (3) when the sow lay down without carrying out much piglet-directed pre-lying behaviour and (4) when the piglets were spread out but near to the sow. The amount of pre-lying behaviour decreased over time and crushing mortality also decreased. The results confirm that the piglets are most vulnerable to crushing during the first 24 h of life, when they are spending much of their time near the udder and have relatively poor mobility. Co-ordination of behaviour between the sow and her litter is important to reduce the risk of crushing. It is also important that the design of open farrowing systems incorporates knowledge about how crushing deaths occur in order to improve piglet welfare.

[1]  J. Hurnik,et al.  An ellipsoid farrowing crate: its ergonomical design and effects on pig productivity. , 1994, Journal of animal science.

[2]  D. Kramer,et al.  Alternative housing for sows and litters: 2. Effects of a communal piglet area on pre- and post-weaning behaviour and performance , 1999 .

[3]  Judith K. Blackshaw,et al.  Comparison of behaviour patterns of sows and litters in a farrowing crate and a farrowing pen , 1994 .

[4]  E. S. E. Hafez,et al.  The behaviour of domestic animals , 1963 .

[5]  G. Cronin,et al.  The welfare of pigs in two farrowing/lactation environments: cortisol responses of sows , 1991 .

[6]  David Fraser,et al.  Crushing of piglets by sows: effects of litter features, pen features and sow behaviour , 1998 .

[7]  Donald M. Broom,et al.  Factors affecting posture-changing in loose-housed and confined gestating sows , 1996 .

[8]  D. Lay,et al.  Danger to pigs due to crushing can be reduced by the use of a simulated udder. , 1999, Journal of animal science.

[9]  A. Lawrence,et al.  The effect of environment on behaviour, plasma cortisol and prolactin in parturient sows. , 1994 .

[10]  B. K. Thompson,et al.  Risky behaviour by piglets: a trade off between feeding and risk of mortality by maternal crushing? , 1996, Animal Behaviour.

[11]  G D Dial,et al.  Reducing pig mortality through supervision during the perinatal period. , 1995, Journal of animal science.

[12]  J. Svendsen Occurrence and causes of traumatic injuries in neonatal pigs , 1986 .

[13]  M. Herskin,et al.  Influence of environmental stimuli on maternal behaviour related to bonding, reactivity and crushing of piglets in domestic sows , 1998 .

[14]  P. English,et al.  The Sow: Improving Her Efficiency , 1982 .

[15]  S. Edwards,et al.  An analysis of the causes of piglet mortality in a breeding herd kept outdoors , 1994, Veterinary Record.

[16]  G. Cronin,et al.  Effects of accommodation type and straw bedding around parturition and during lactation on the behaviour of primiparous sows and survival and growth of piglets to weaning , 1992 .

[17]  Beat Wechsler,et al.  Individual differences in the behaviour of sows at the nest-site and the crushing of piglets , 1997 .

[18]  G. Cronin,et al.  The effects of the gestation and farrowing environments on sow and piglet behaviour and piglet survival and growth in early lactation , 1996 .

[19]  Judith K. Blackshaw,et al.  Getting-Up and Lying-Down Behaviours of Loose- Housed Sows and Social Contacts Between Sows and Piglets During Day 1 and Day 8 After Parturition , 1990 .

[20]  E. Swierstra,et al.  CAUSES OF PIGLET DEATH FROM BIRTH TO WEANING , 1987 .

[21]  D. Lay,et al.  Butorphanol tartrate acts to decrease sow activity, which could lead to reduced pig crushing. , 1999, Journal of animal science.

[22]  A. Lawrence,et al.  The responsiveness of sows to their piglets in relation to the length of parturition and the involvement of endogenous opioids , 1999 .

[23]  Harold W. Gonyou,et al.  Increasing available space in a farrowing crate does not facilitate postural changes or maternal responses in gilts , 1998 .

[24]  David Fraser,et al.  Sow body movements that crush piglets: a comparison between two types of farrowing accommodation , 1996 .

[25]  J. Glastonbury A survey of preweaning mortality in the pig. , 1976, Australian veterinary journal.

[26]  D. Arey,et al.  Behaviour and productivity of sows and piglets in a family system and in farrowing crates , 1996 .