Operating Room of the Future Orthopedic Perspective

The complexity of orthopedic procedures has mounted with increasing numbers of minimally invasive surgeries. Lack of optimal patient outcomes persist despite new techniques and improved implants. While improved training for physicians can enhance patient outcomes, computer assisted surgery (CAS) has the capability to provide even greater benefits to the patient by increasing control and repeatability. Cutting edge technology fused with new computerized techniques facilitates a full cycle of implant design and development by providing surgical preplanning and intraoperative guidance followed by post-operative gait analysis. In the pre-operative phase, these technologies can reconstruct patient specific bone models, automate cutting plane placement, and highlight anatomical abnormalities. In the intra-operative phase, the state-of-the-art CAS systems virtualize surgical protocols, provide real-time hyper-resolution micro-sensor feedback in ligament balancing, and wireless navigation guidance. Finally, in post-operative scenarios, disruptive technologies enable improved implant design through acquisition and analysis of 3D kinematic gait lab data. By introducing novel technologies and advanced computerized methods into the operating room (OR), the next generation of CAS systems will further surgeons' ability to control positive patient outcomes.

[1]  Mohamed R Mahfouz,et al.  In vivo contact pressures in total knee arthroplasty. , 2007, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[2]  A. Terzis,et al.  A robust 3D high precision radio location system , 2007, 2007 IEEE/MTT-S International Microwave Symposium.

[3]  Ryan A. Beasley,et al.  Registration of ultrasound images , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[4]  M. R. Mahfouz,et al.  Automatic methods for characterization of sexual dimorphism of adult femora: distal femur , 2007, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[5]  Reiner S. Thoma,et al.  UWB Localization - Active and Passive Approach , 2004 .

[6]  Mohamed R Mahfouz,et al.  Effect of segmentation errors on 3D-to-2D registration of implant models in X-ray images. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  Mohamed Mahfouz,et al.  Knee mechanics: a review of past and present techniques to determine in vivo loads. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  Jorge A Ochoa,et al.  In Vivo Comparison of Hip Separation After Metal-on-Metal or Metal-on-Polyethylene Total Hip Arthroplasty , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  A.E. Fathy,et al.  Development of an UWB Indoor 3D Positioning Radar with Millimeter Accuracy , 2006, 2006 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest.

[10]  Cam Nguyen,et al.  Uniplanar picosecond pulse generator using step-recovery diode , 2001 .

[11]  Richard D. Komistek,et al.  A robust method for registration of three-dimensional knee implant models to two-dimensional fluoroscopy images , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  Evans,et al.  MEMS Capacitive Strain Sensing Elements for Integrated Total Knee Arthroplasty Prosthesis Monitoring , 2007 .

[13]  R.J. Fontana,et al.  Recent system applications of short-pulse ultra-wideband (UWB) technology , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[14]  Richard D Komistek,et al.  In vivo comparison of femorotibial contact positions for press-fit posterior stabilized and posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasties. , 2002, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[15]  Wenchao Qu,et al.  Design of Analog Signal Processing Integrated Circuit for Multi-Channel Biomedical Strain Measurement Instrument , 2008, BIODEVICES.

[16]  C.L. Law,et al.  Pulse detection algorithm for line-of-sight (LOS) UWB ranging applications , 2005, IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters.

[17]  A.E. Fathy,et al.  Accurate UWB indoor localization system utilizing time difference of arrival approach , 2006, 2006 IEEE Radio and Wireless Symposium.

[18]  M. Haider,et al.  Flexible capacitive sensors for high resolution pressure measurement , 2008, 2008 IEEE Sensors.

[19]  David J. Hawkes,et al.  Self-calibrating 3D-ultrasound-based bone registration for minimally invasive orthopedic surgery , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[20]  A.E. Fathy,et al.  Reconfigurable Pico-Pulse Generator for UWB Applications , 2006, 2006 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest.

[21]  S. Winter,et al.  Registration of 3D CT and ultrasound datasets of the spine using bone structures. , 2002, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[22]  Gary To,et al.  Development of the Telemetrical Intraoperative Soft Tissue Tension Monitoring System in Total Knee Replacement with MEMS and ASIC Technologies , 2007 .

[23]  Susanne Winter,et al.  Bone registration with 3D CT and ultrasound datasets , 2003, CARS.

[24]  Richard D. Komistek,et al.  In Vivo Kinematics for Subjects With and Without an Anterior Cruciate Ligament , 2002, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[25]  D. Dennis,et al.  In Vivo Fluoroscopic Analysis of the Normal Human Knee , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.