Results of radical prostatectomy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE To assess the results of radical prostatectomy in men with early prostate cancer. DESIGN Retrospective, nonrandomized, multi-institutional pooled analysis. SETTING Eight university medical centers in the United States and Europe. PATIENTS A total of 2758 men with stage Tl and T2 prostatic cancer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Disease-specific and metastasis-free survival rates. RESULTS Tumor grade was the most important preoperative factor in determining outcome. Disease-specific survival 10 years following surgery and associated 95% confidence intervals were 94% (range, 87%-98%), 80% (range, 74%-85%), and 77% (range, 65%-86%) for those men with grade 1, 2, and 3 tumors, respectively. Metastasis-free survival at 10 years was 87% (range, 78%-92%), 68% (range, 62%-73%), and 52% (range, 38%-64%) for patients with grade 1, 2, and 3 cancers, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Radical prostatectomy leads to high 10-year disease-specific survival rates in men with all tumor grades. However, caution is needed in comparing these results with similar studies of alternative treatment strategies, such as watchful waiting, due to the inherent potential biases in uncontrolled trials. Nevertheless, these results offer the best currently available estimates of 10-year outcome of radical prostatectomy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer and may be useful in counseling patients with early malignancy.

[1]  G. Prout Diagnosis and staging of prostatic carcinoma , 1973 .

[2]  J. Oesterling,et al.  Prostate Cancer Clinical Guidelines Panel Summary report on the management of clinically localized prostate cancer. The American Urological Association. , 1995, The Journal of urology.

[3]  R. Thisted,et al.  Results of conservative management of clinically localized prostate cancer. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  J. Oesterling,et al.  Long-term (15 years) results after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized (stage T2c or lower) prostate cancer. , 1994, The Journal of urology.

[5]  I. Thompson,et al.  Meta-analysis of the literature: guideline development for prostate cancer treatment. American Urological Association Prostate Cancer Guideline Panel. , 1994, The Journal of urology.

[6]  A. Partin,et al.  Cancer control and quality of life following anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy: results at 10 years. , 1994, The Journal of urology.

[7]  M. Hafermann,et al.  Adjuvant radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy: results and complications. , 1986, The Journal of urology.

[8]  P. Scardino,et al.  Can radical prostatectomy alter the progression of poorly differentiated prostate cancer? , 1994, The Journal of urology.

[9]  D. Fryback,et al.  Long-term survival among men with conservatively treated localized prostate cancer. , 1995, JAMA.

[10]  T. Wilt,et al.  The Prostate Cancer Intervention Versus Observation Trial: a randomized trial comparing radical prostatectomy versus expectant management for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer. , 1994, The Journal of urology.

[11]  E. Kaplan,et al.  Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations , 1958 .

[12]  M. Parmar,et al.  Meta-analysis of the literature or of individual patient data: is there a difference? , 1993, The Lancet.

[13]  W. Haenszel,et al.  Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. , 1959, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[14]  A W Partin,et al.  Serum PSA after anatomic radical prostatectomy. The Johns Hopkins experience after 10 years. , 1993, The Urologic clinics of North America.

[15]  L. Stewart,et al.  From science to practice. Meta-analyses using individual patient data are needed. , 1995 .

[16]  D. Cox Regression Models and Life-Tables , 1972 .

[17]  J. Adolfsson,et al.  Recent result of managment of palpable clinically localized prostate cancer , 1993, Cancer.