The Timeline of Elections: A Comparative Perspective

Scholars are only beginning to understand the evolution of electoral sentiment over time. How do preferences come into focus over the electoral cycle in different countries? Do they evolve in patterned ways? Does the evolution vary across countries? This paper addresses these issues. We consider differences in political institutions and how they might impact voter preferences over the course of the election cycle. We then outline an empirical analysis relating support for parties or candidates in pre-election polls to their final vote. The analysis relies on over 26,000 vote intention polls in 45 countries since 1942, covering 312 discrete electoral cycles. Our results indicate that early polls contain substantial information about the final result but that they become increasingly informative over the election cycle. Although the degree to which this is true varies across countries in important and understandable ways given differences in political institutions, the pattern is strikingly general.

[1]  Business School,et al.  Forecasting Elections , 2018, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining. 2nd Ed..

[2]  Lena Osterhagen,et al.  Multiple Imputation For Nonresponse In Surveys , 2016 .

[3]  Alison Brysk.  The Message Matters , 2013 .

[4]  Christopher Wlezien,et al.  Polls and the Vote in Britain , 2013 .

[5]  P. Whiteley,et al.  Making political choices , 2013 .

[6]  Christopher Wlezien,et al.  The Timeline of Presidential Elections: How Campaigns Do (and Do Not) Matter , 2012 .

[7]  Christopher Wlezien,et al.  Performance pressure: Patterns of partisanship and the economic vote , 2011 .

[8]  James A. Stimson,et al.  The Moving Centre: Preferences for Government Activity in Britain, 1950–2005 , 2010, British Journal of Political Science.

[9]  Robert S. Erikson,et al.  Balancing, Generic Polls and Midterm Congressional Elections , 2010 .

[10]  Dieter Nohlen,et al.  Elections in Europe : a data handbook , 2010 .

[11]  H. Clarke,et al.  Making Political Choices: Canada and the United States , 2008 .

[12]  Todd G. Shields,et al.  The Persuadable Voter: Wedge Issues in Presidential Campaigns , 2008 .

[13]  Anthony F. Heath.  Perspectives on Electoral Behavior , 2007 .

[14]  Oddbjørn Knutsen.  The Decline of Social Class , 2007 .

[15]  H. Klingemann,et al.  The Oxford handbook of political behavior , 2007 .

[16]  John H. Aldrich,et al.  Change and Continuity In the 2004 and 2006 Elections , 2007 .

[17]  Richard Johnston,et al.  Capturing Campaign Effects , 2006 .

[18]  Matt Golder.  Presidential Coattails and Legislative Fragmentation , 2006 .

[19]  Kevin Arceneaux,et al.  Do Campaigns Help Voters Learn? A Cross-National Analysis , 2005, British Journal of Political Science.

[20]  Csaba Nikolenyi.  A Unified Theory of Party Competition: A Cross-National Analysis Integrating Spatial and Behavioral Factors , 2005, Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique.

[21]  J. Vermeer.  The 2000 Presidential Election and the Foundations of Party Politics , 2005, Perspectives on Politics.

[22]  M. Shugart,et al.  Looking for Locals: Voter Information Demands and Personal Vote‐Earning Attributes of Legislators under Proportional Representation , 2005 .

[23]  Mark A. Kayser.  Who Surfs, Who Manipulates? The Determinants of Opportunistic Election Timing and Electorally Motivated Economic Intervention , 2005, American Political Science Review.

[24]  André Blais,et al.  Time-of-voting decision and susceptibility to campaign effects , 2004 .

[25]  Christopher Wlezien,et al.  Likely (and Unlikely) Voters and the Assessment of Campaign Dynamics , 2004 .

[26]  P. Whiteley,et al.  Political Choice in Britain , 2004 .

[27]  Kathleen A. Frankovic,et al.  Review: Horserace Polling and Survey Method Effects: An Analysis of the 2000 Campaign , 2003 .

[28]  N. Nevitte,et al.  Campaign Dynamics in the 2000 Canadian Election: How the Leader Debates Salvaged the Conservative Party , 2003, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[29]  Robert S. Erikson,et al.  The Timeline of Presidential Election Campaigns , 2002, The Journal of Politics.

[30]  J. Zaller.  The statistical power of election studies to detect media exposure effects in political campaigns , 2002 .

[31]  Campaign Effects in Theory and Practice , 2001 .

[32]  J. Zaller.  FLOATING VOTERS IN U.S. PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS, 1948-2000 , 2004 .

[33]  Randolph T. Stevenson,et al.  Does Campaign Length Matter? Testing for Cross-National Effects , 2000, British Journal of Political Science.

[34]  James E. Campbell.  The American Campaign: U.S. Presidential Campaigns and the National Vote , 2000 .

[35]  James C. Garand,et al.  Before the vote : forecasting American national elections , 2000 .

[36]  D. Shaw.  A Study of Presidential Campaign Event Effects from 1952 to 1992 , 1999, The Journal of Politics.

[37]  James A. Stimson.  Public Opinion In America: Moods, Cycles, And Swings, Second Edition , 1999 .

[38]  John Zaller,et al.  Politicians as Prize Fighters: Electoral Selection and Incumbency Advantage , 1998 .

[39]  P. Mair.  Party System Change: Approaches and Interpretations , 1997 .

[40]  Gary W. Cox,et al.  Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World's Electoral Systems , 1997 .

[41]  L. Sigelman,et al.  Poll-Based Forecasts of the House Vote in Presidential Election Years , 1996 .

[42]  C. Eijk,et al.  Choosing Europe?: The European Electorate and National Politics in the Face of Union , 1996 .

[43]  Klaus Eder,et al.  The social construction of nature , 1996 .

[44]  John M. Carey,et al.  Incentives to cultivate a personal vote: A rank ordering of electoral formulas☆ , 1995 .

[45]  M. Lodge,et al.  The Responsive Voter: Campaign Information and the Dynamics of Candidate Evaluation , 1995, American Political Science Review.

[46]  Richard R. Lau,et al.  AN ANALYSIS OF THE ACCURACY OF “TRIAL HEAT” POLLS DURING THE 1992 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION , 1994 .

[47]  Gary King,et al.  Why Are American Presidential Election Campaign Polls So Variable When Votes Are So Predictable? , 1993, British Journal of Political Science.

[48]  Steven E. Finkel,et al.  Reexamining the "Minimal Effects" Model in Recent Presidential Campaigns , 1993, The Journal of Politics.

[49]  Richard Johnston.  Letting the people decide : dynamics of a Canadian election , 1992 .

[50]  Matthew Soberg Shugart,et al.  Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics , 1992 .

[51]  Matthew Soberg Shugart,et al.  Presidents and Assemblies: Index , 1992 .

[52]  A. Abramowitz.  Incumbency, Campaign Spending, and the Decline of Competition in U.S. House Elections , 1991, The Journal of Politics.

[53]  James E. Campbell,et al.  Presidential Coattails in Senate Elections , 1990, American Political Science Review.

[54]  A. Abramowitz.  Explaining Senate Election Outcomes , 1988, American Political Science Review.

[55]  J. Ferejohn,et al.  The Constituency Service Basis of the Personal Vote for U.S. Representatives and British Members of Parliament , 1984, American Political Science Review.

[56]  J. Ferejohn,et al.  Presidential Coattails in Historical Perspective , 1984 .

[57]  S. Rosenstone.  Forecasting Presidential Elections , 1983 .

[58]  Rein Taagepera,et al.  “Effective” Number of Parties , 1979 .

[59]  Mogens N. Pedersen,et al.  THE DYNAMICS OF EUROPEAN PARTY SYSTEMS: CHANGING PATTERNS OF ELECTORAL VOLATILITY , 1979 .

[60]  Richard F. Fenno.  Home Style : House Members in Their Districts , 1978 .

[61]  Philip E. Converse,et al.  Of Time and Partisan Stability , 1969 .

[62]  M. Duverger.  Political Parties Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State , 1964 .

[63]  Angus Campbell,et al.  The American voter , 1960 .

[64]  Paul F. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Voting. A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign , 1956 .

[65]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign , 1954 .