A quaternion-based formulation of Euler–Bernoulli beam without singularity

This paper proposes a singularity-free beam element with Euler–Bernoulli assumption, i.e., the cross section remains rigid and perpendicular to the tangent of the centerline during deformation. Each node of this two-nodal beam element has eight nodal coordinates, including three global positions and one normal strain to describe the rigid translation and flexible deformation of the centerline, respectively, four Euler parameters or quaternion to represent the attitude of cross section. Adopting quaternion instead of Eulerian angles as nodal variables avoids the traditionally encountered singularity problem. The rigid cross section assumption is automatically satisfied. To guarantee the perpendicularity of cross section to the deformed neutral axes, the position and orientation coordinates are coupled interpolated by a special method developed here. The proposed beam element allows arbitrary spatial rigid motion, and large bending, extension, and torsion deformation. The resulting governing equations include normalization constraint equations for each quaternion of the beam nodes, and can be directly solved by the available differential algebraic equation (DAE) solvers. Finally, several numerical examples are presented to verify the large deformation, natural frequencies and dynamic behavior of the proposed beam element.

[1]  Ahmed A. Shabana,et al.  Uniqueness of the Geometric Representation in Large Rotation Finite Element Formulations , 2010 .

[2]  E. Hairer,et al.  Solving Ordinary Differential Equations II: Stiff and Differential-Algebraic Problems , 2010 .

[3]  Lei Yu,et al.  Multibody Dynamic Model of Web Guiding System With Moving Web , 2010 .

[4]  Erwin Krämer,et al.  Dynamics of Rotors and Foundations , 1993 .

[5]  Aki Mikkola,et al.  A two-dimensional shear deformable beam element based on the absolute nodal coordinate formulation , 2005 .

[6]  Linda R. Petzold,et al.  Numerical solution of initial-value problems in differential-algebraic equations , 1996, Classics in applied mathematics.

[7]  E. Reissner On one-dimensional finite-strain beam theory: The plane problem , 1972 .

[8]  E. J. Haug,et al.  Computer aided kinematics and dynamics of mechanical systems. Vol. 1: basic methods , 1989 .

[9]  Stefan von Dombrowski,et al.  Analysis of Large Flexible Body Deformation in Multibody Systems Using Absolute Coordinates , 2002 .

[10]  S. Hanagud,et al.  Problem of the dynamics of a cantilevered beam attached to a moving base , 1989 .

[11]  J. C. Simo,et al.  A three-dimensional finite-strain rod model. Part II: Computational aspects , 1986 .

[12]  R. Y. Yakoub,et al.  Three Dimensional Absolute Nodal Coordinate Formulation for Beam Elements: Theory , 2001 .

[13]  E. Reissner On finite deformations of space-curved beams , 1981 .

[14]  A. Mikkola,et al.  A new locking-free shear deformable finite element based on absolute nodal coordinates , 2007 .

[15]  Ahmed A. Shabana,et al.  Dynamics of Multibody Systems , 2020 .

[16]  Lawrence F. Shampine,et al.  Solving 0 = F(t, y(t), y′(t)) in Matlab , 2002, J. Num. Math..

[17]  Johannes Gerstmayr,et al.  Analysis of Thin Beams and Cables Using the Absolute Nodal Co-ordinate Formulation , 2006 .

[18]  Joan Lasenby,et al.  Simo-Vu Quoc rods using Clifford algebra , 1999 .

[19]  J. C. Simo,et al.  A finite strain beam formulation. The three-dimensional dynamic problem. Part I , 1985 .

[20]  T. R. Kane,et al.  Dynamics of a cantilever beam attached to a moving base , 1987 .

[21]  A. Mikkola,et al.  Description of Elastic Forces in Absolute Nodal Coordinate Formulation , 2003 .

[22]  J. C. Simo,et al.  On the dynamics of finite-strain rods undergoing large motions a geometrically exact approach , 1988 .

[23]  J. Domínguez,et al.  An Internal Damping Model for the Absolute Nodal Coordinate Formulation , 2005 .