Recovery-based error estimation in the dynamic analysis of offshore wind turbine monopile foundations

Abstract Offshore wind turbine foundations are affected by cyclic loads due to oscillatory kinematic loads, such as those from wind, waves, and earthquakes. Monopiles are often used as a foundation concept for offshore windmill turbines. In this study, coupled dynamic equations with the u - P formulation for low-frequency load are considered for an offshore wind turbine monopile foundation, to present the response in terms of pore water pressure (PWP), stress and strain distribution in an elastic porous medium at regions around the monopile foundation. Different stress recovery techniques based on the Zienkeiwicz–Zhu (ZZ) error estimator namely, super-convergent patch recovery (SPR), weighted super-convergent patch recovery (WSPR), and L2-projection techniques are also investigated to recover the stresses at nodal points in the finite element method. To estimate errors in the time domain when performing transient simulations, three recovery processes are used with different meshes. The convergence of the dynamic problem is also studied. The results are verified with findings in the literature, revealing that the time period of effective stresses follows the applied load frequency. In conclusion, the history of the shear stress can have an important effect on the shear stress distribution, making it asymmetric in the time domain.

[1]  Xiu Ye.  Domain decomposition for a least-square finite element method for second order elliptic problem , 1998 .

[2]  B. Das.  Advanced Soil Mechanics , 2019 .

[3]  M. Pastor,et al.  Static and dynamic behaviour of soils : a rational approach to quantitative solutions. I. Fully saturated problems , 1990, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[4]  Søren Peder Hyldal Sørensen,et al.  Assessment of foundation design for offshore monopiles unprotected against scour , 2013 .

[5]  O. C. Zienkiewicz,et al.  Superconvergence and the superconvergent patch recovery , 1995 .

[6]  Miao Li,et al.  Study of offshore monopile behaviour due to ocean waves , 2011 .

[7]  Georg Großeholz,et al.  A more flexible and effective analysis of porous media considering edge-based smoothed meshfree techniques , 2014 .

[8]  A. Elgamal,et al.  Modeling of cyclic mobility in saturated cohesionless soils , 2003 .

[9]  Mohammad Hadi Afshar,et al.  Mixed discrete least squares meshless method for planar elasticity problems using regular and irregular nodal distributions , 2012 .

[10]  M. B. C. Ulker,et al.  Response of saturated and nearly saturated porous media: Different formulations and their applicability , 2009 .

[11]  Pablo Cuéllar,et al.  Pile foundations for offshore wind turbines: Numerical and experimental investigations on the behaviour under short-term and long-term cyclic loading , 2011 .

[12]  Qi Shao,et al.  Numerical simulation on seismic liquefaction by adaptive mesh refinement due to two recovered fields in error estimation , 2013 .

[13]  Zhen Chen,et al.  Material point method for dynamic analysis of saturated porous media under external contact/impact of solid bodies , 2009 .

[14]  R. E. Olson.  Consolidation Under Time-Dependent Loading , 1977 .

[15]  M. Biot.  MECHANICS OF DEFORMATION AND ACOUSTIC PROPAGATION IN POROUS MEDIA , 1962 .

[16]  Lars Vabbersgaard Andersen,et al.  Impedance of Bucket Foundations: Torsional, Horizontal and Rocking Motion , 2008 .

[17]  Dong-Sheng Jeng,et al.  Wave-induced response of seabed: Various formulations and their applicability , 2009 .

[18]  Gopal Madabhushi,et al.  Lateral and Axial Capacity of Monopiles for Offshore Wind Turbines , 2013 .

[19]  Juan José Ródenas,et al.  Efficient finite element methodology based on cartesian grids: application to structural shape optimization , 2013 .

[20]  J. Lysmer,et al.  Finite Dynamic Model for Infinite Media , 1969 .

[21]  Dong-Sheng Jeng,et al.  An analytical solution for response of a porous seabed to combined wave and current loading , 2013 .

[22]  O. C. Zienkiewicz,et al.  A simple error estimator and adaptive procedure for practical engineerng analysis , 1987 .

[23]  Christophe Geuzaine,et al.  Gmsh: A 3‐D finite element mesh generator with built‐in pre‐ and post‐processing facilities , 2009 .

[24]  Kim André Larsen,et al.  Modified vertical bearing capacity for circular foundations in sand using reduced friction angle , 2012 .

[25]  Ole Hededal,et al.  A new elasto-plastic spring element for cyclic loading of piles using the p-y curve concept , 2010 .

[26]  Majidreza Nazem,et al.  A comparative study of error assessment techniques for dynamic contact problems of geomechanics , 2012 .

[27]  O. C. Zienkiewicz,et al.  h andh-p version error estimation and adaptive procedures from theory to practice , 1989, Engineering with Computers.

[28]  Xikui Li,et al.  An iterative stabilized fractional step algorithm for finite element analysis in saturated soil dynamics , 2003 .

[29]  Jean-Herve Prevost,et al.  Wave propagation in fluid-saturated porous media: An efficient finite element procedure , 1985 .

[30]  O. Zienkiewicz,et al.  Dynamic behaviour of saturated porous media; The generalized Biot formulation and its numerical solution , 1984 .

[31]  Ali Pak,et al.  Three-dimensional simulation of fully coupled hydro-mechanical behavior of saturated porous media using Element Free Galerkin (EFG) method , 2012 .

[32]  Delfim Soares,et al.  Iterative dynamic analysis of linear and nonlinear fully saturated porous media considering edge-based smoothed meshfree techniques , 2013 .

[33]  Harry G. Poulos,et al.  Closure of "Behavior of Laterally Loaded Piles: I-Single Piles" , 1971 .

[34]  Tadahiko Shiomi,et al.  Practical Programming in Computational Geomechanics: With Special Reference to Earthquake Engineering , 1999 .

[35]  Kazuo Konagai,et al.  Numerical analysis of nonlinear soil–pile group interaction under lateral loads , 2007 .

[36]  Klaus-Jürgen Bathe,et al.  The inf–sup condition and its evaluation for mixed finite element methods , 2001 .

[37]  A. Chan.  A unified finite element solution to static and dynamic problems of geomechanics , 1988 .

[38]  Rüdiger Scharff,et al.  Monopile foundations for offshore wind turbines – solutions for greater water depths , 2013 .

[39]  Poul Henning Kirkegaard,et al.  Local Tensor Radiation Conditions For Elastic Waves , 2001 .

[40]  Paul Doherty,et al.  Laterally loaded monopile design for offshore wind farms , 2012 .

[41]  J. Z. Zhu,et al.  The superconvergent patch recovery and a posteriori error estimates. Part 2: Error estimates and adaptivity , 1992 .

[42]  Martin Achmus,et al.  Behavior of monopile foundations under cyclic lateral load , 2009 .

[43]  M. Quecedo,et al.  A fractional step algorithm allowing equal order of interpolation for coupled analysis of saturated soil problems , 2000 .

[44]  Nasser Khalili,et al.  A stable meshfree method for fully coupled flow-deformation analysis of saturated porous media , 2010 .

[45]  Lars Vabbersgaard Andersen,et al.  Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Engineering Computational Technology , 2008 .

[46]  Yin Xunqiang,et al.  ANSYS implementation of damping solvent stepwise extraction method for nonlinear seismic analysis of large 3-D structures , 2013 .

[47]  Lars Vabbersgaard Andersen,et al.  Assessment of the Dynamic Behaviour of Saturated Soil Subjected to Cyclic Loading from Offshore Monopile Wind Turbine Foundations , 2014 .

[48]  Xiaowei Tang,et al.  H-adaptivity applied to liquefiable soil in nonlinear analysis of soil–pile interaction , 2005 .

[49]  Xiaowei Tang,et al.  Adaptive Mesh Refinement and Error Estimate for 3-D Seismic Analysis of Liquefiable Soil Considering Large Deformation , 2004 .

[50]  Robert L. Higdon,et al.  Radiation boundary conditions for elastic wave propagation , 1990 .

[51]  A. Elgamal,et al.  Computational modeling of cyclic mobility and post-liquefaction site response , 2002 .

[52]  Amir R. Khoei,et al.  Modeling of crack propagation via an automatic adaptive mesh refinement based on modified superconvergent patch recovery technique , 2008 .

[53]  F. Brezzi.  On the existence, uniqueness and approximation of saddle-point problems arising from lagrangian multipliers , 1974 .

[54]  D. Jeng,et al.  Wave-induced soil response in an unsaturated anisotropic seabed of finite thickness , 1994 .

[55]  Lars Vabbersgaard Andersen,et al.  Linear Elastodynamic Analysis , 2006 .

[56]  J. Z. Zhu,et al.  The superconvergent patch recovery and a posteriori error estimates. Part 1: The recovery technique , 1992 .

[57]  Cv Clemens Verhoosel,et al.  Isogeometric finite element analysis of poroelasticity , 2013 .

[58]  Manuel Pastor,et al.  Stabilized low-order finite elements for failure and localization problems in undrained soils and foundations , 1999 .

[59]  Denis Duhamel,et al.  Boundary integral formulation and two-dimensional fundamental solutions for dynamic behavior analysis of unsaturated soils , 2011 .

[60]  Boris Jeremić,et al.  Numerical modeling and simulation of pile in liquefiable soil , 2009 .

[61]  M. Biot.  Theory of Propagation of Elastic Waves in a Fluid‐Saturated Porous Solid. I. Low‐Frequency Range , 1956 .

[62]  L. Richardson.  The Approximate Arithmetical Solution by Finite Differences of Physical Problems Involving Differential Equations, with an Application to the Stresses in a Masonry Dam , 1911 .

[63]  O. C. Zienkiewicz,et al.  Generalized plasticity and the modelling of soil behaviour , 1990 .

[64]  M. B. C. Ulker,et al.  Wave-induced dynamic response and instability of seabed around caisson breakwater , 2010 .

[65]  Werner Rücker,et al.  A numerical model for the transient analysis of offshore foundations under cyclic loading , 2014 .

[66]  Dong-Sheng Jeng,et al.  Dynamic response of an offshore pile to pseudo-Stoneley waves along the interface between a poroelastic seabed and seawater , 2010 .

[67]  Stéphane Bordas,et al.  Smooth finite element methods: Convergence, accuracy and properties , 2008 .

[68]  Patrick Joly,et al.  Absorbing boundary conditions for Rayleigh waves , 1988 .