Peptides of a Feather: How Computation Is Taking Peptide Therapeutics under Its Wing

Leveraging computation in the development of peptide therapeutics has garnered increasing recognition as a valuable tool to generate novel therapeutics for disease-related targets. To this end, computation has transformed the field of peptide design through identifying novel therapeutics that exhibit enhanced pharmacokinetic properties and reduced toxicity. The process of in-silico peptide design involves the application of molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulations, and machine learning algorithms. Three primary approaches for peptide therapeutic design including structural-based, protein mimicry, and short motif design have been predominantly adopted. Despite the ongoing progress made in this field, there are still significant challenges pertaining to peptide design including: enhancing the accuracy of computational methods; improving the success rate of preclinical and clinical trials; and developing better strategies to predict pharmacokinetics and toxicity. In this review, we discuss past and present research pertaining to the design and development of in-silico peptide therapeutics in addition to highlighting the potential of computation and artificial intelligence in the future of disease therapeutics.

[1]  G. Montelione,et al.  Cell-permeable chameleonic peptides: Exploiting conformational dynamics in de novo cyclic peptide design. , 2023, Current opinion in structural biology.

[2]  Elizabeth I. Parkinson,et al.  Stapled Peptides as Direct Inhibitors of Nrf2-sMAF Transcription Factors , 2023, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[3]  J. Krieger,et al.  Before and after AlphaFold2: An overview of protein structure prediction , 2023, Frontiers in Bioinformatics.

[4]  A. Hinck,et al.  De novo design of BMP mimics. , 2023, Biophysical journal.

[5]  Jie Zhou,et al.  Novel Muscle-Homing Peptide FGF1 Conjugate Based on AlphaFold for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. , 2023, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[6]  H. Tamamura,et al.  Low-molecular-weight anti-HIV-1 agents targeting HIV-1 capsid proteins , 2023, RSC advances.

[7]  Y. Jang,et al.  Recombinant Protein Mimicking the Antigenic Structure of the Viral Surface Envelope Protein Reinforces Induction of an Antigen-Specific and Virus-Neutralizing Immune Response Against Dengue Virus , 2023, Journal of Microbiology.

[8]  Yuchi Qiu,et al.  Persistent spectral theory-guided protein engineering , 2022, bioRxiv.

[9]  J. Meiler,et al.  Benchmarking AlphaFold2 on peptide structure prediction. , 2022, Structure.

[10]  D. Baker,et al.  Isoform-specific inhibition of FGFR signaling achieved by a de-novo-designed mini-protein , 2022, Cell reports.

[11]  A. Watkins,et al.  Anchor Residues Govern Binding and Folding of an Intrinsically Disordered Domain. , 2022, ACS chemical biology.

[12]  O. S.,et al.  Accurate prediction of protein structures and interactions using a three-track neural network , 2022, Yearbook of Paediatric Endocrinology.

[13]  L. R. Gupta,et al.  Immunoinformatics-Aided Design and In Vivo Validation of a Peptide-Based Multiepitope Vaccine Targeting Canine Circovirus , 2022, ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science.

[14]  S. Willems,et al.  AlphaPeptDeep: a modular deep learning framework to predict peptide properties for proteomics , 2022, bioRxiv.

[15]  F. Dehne,et al.  A computational approach to rapidly design peptides that detect SARS-CoV-2 surface protein S , 2022, NAR genomics and bioinformatics.

[16]  G. Omenn,et al.  De novo protein fold design through sequence-independent fragment assembly simulations , 2022, bioRxiv.

[17]  Wenhui Xi,et al.  Inter-Residue Distance Prediction From Duet Deep Learning Models , 2022, Frontiers in Genetics.

[18]  D. Marks,et al.  RITA: a Study on Scaling Up Generative Protein Sequence Models , 2022, ArXiv.

[19]  K. Biggar,et al.  Assessing sequence-based protein–protein interaction predictors for use in therapeutic peptide engineering , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[20]  P. Hosseinzadeh,et al.  Design of Protein Segments and Peptides for Binding to Protein Targets , 2022, Biodesign research.

[21]  B. Haagmans,et al.  SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis , 2022, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[22]  Philip M. Kim,et al.  Phage display identification of nanomolar ligands for human NEDD4-WW3: Energetic and dynamic implications for the development of broad-spectrum antivirals. , 2022, International journal of biological macromolecules.

[23]  H. Ruohola-Baker,et al.  dCas9 fusion to computer-designed PRC2 inhibitor reveals functional TATA box in distal promoter region , 2022, Cell reports.

[24]  Nanxi Wang,et al.  Therapeutic peptides: current applications and future directions , 2022, Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy.

[25]  Rachel M. Krabacher,et al.  A high-throughput pipeline for design and selection of peptides targeting the SARS-Cov-2 Spike protein , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[26]  Norman E. Davey,et al.  The Eukaryotic Linear Motif resource: 2022 release , 2021, Nucleic Acids Res..

[27]  J. Korbel,et al.  AlphaDesign: A de novo protein design framework based on AlphaFold , 2021, bioRxiv.

[28]  Rongrong Xing,et al.  Molecular imprinting and cladding produces antibody mimics with significantly improved affinity and specificity. , 2021, Science bulletin.

[29]  Daniel J. Burnside,et al.  Human-Soybean Allergies: Elucidation of the Seed Proteome and Comprehensive Protein-Protein Interaction Prediction. , 2021, Journal of proteome research.

[30]  C. Deane,et al.  The Therapeutic Antibody Profiler for Computational Developability Assessment. , 2021, Methods in molecular biology.

[31]  O. Schueler‐Furman,et al.  Harnessing protein folding neural networks for peptide–protein docking , 2021, Nature Communications.

[32]  Oriol Vinyals,et al.  Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold , 2021, Nature.

[33]  R. Garg,et al.  Challenges of peptide and protein drug delivery by oral route: Current strategies to improve the bioavailability , 2021, Drug development research.

[34]  David E. Kim,et al.  Protein sequence design by conformational landscape optimization , 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  O. Lequin,et al.  Human ACE2 peptide-mimics block SARS-CoV-2 pulmonary cells infection , 2021, Communications Biology.

[36]  G. King,et al.  Trends in peptide drug discovery , 2021, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[37]  Jianbo Xiao,et al.  Discovery of the bioactive peptides secreted by Bifidobacterium using integrated MCX coupled with LC-MS and feature-based molecular networking. , 2021, Food chemistry.

[38]  D. Spring,et al.  Peptides as a platform for targeted therapeutics for cancer: peptide-drug conjugates (PDCs). , 2020, Chemical Society reviews.

[39]  M. Madhusudhan,et al.  Peptide bond planarity constrains hydrogen bond geometry and influences secondary structure conformations , 2020, Current research in structural biology.

[40]  Yizhou Li,et al.  DeepACP: A Novel Computational Approach for Accurate Identification of Anticancer Peptides by Deep Learning Algorithm , 2020, Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids.

[41]  P. Mattila,et al.  AutoCoEv—A High-Throughput In Silico Pipeline for Predicting Inter-Protein Coevolution , 2020, bioRxiv.

[42]  Soni Kaundal,et al.  Structure-Guided Designing and Evaluation of Peptides Targeting Bacterial Transcription , 2020, Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology.

[43]  D. Baker,et al.  An enumerative algorithm for de novo design of proteins with diverse pocket structures , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[44]  Le Hoa Tan,et al.  PIPE4: Fast PPI Predictor for Comprehensive Inter- and Cross-Species Interactomes , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[45]  Andrew L. Ferguson,et al.  Discovery of Self-Assembling π-Conjugated Peptides by Active Learning-Directed Coarse-Grained Molecular Simulation , 2020, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[46]  Balachandran Manavalan,et al.  Machine intelligence in peptide therapeutics: A next‐generation tool for rapid disease screening , 2020, Medicinal research reviews.

[47]  Xiuwen Liu,et al.  ProDCoNN: Protein design using a convolutional neural network , 2019, Proteins.

[48]  Jianyi Yang,et al.  Improved protein structure prediction using predicted interresidue orientations , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[49]  Brian Kuhlman,et al.  Advances in protein structure prediction and design , 2019, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[50]  Yu Yao,et al.  An integration of deep learning with feature embedding for protein–protein interaction prediction , 2019, PeerJ.

[51]  Zhijun Li,et al.  Development of Allosteric BRAF Peptide Inhibitors Targeting the Dimer Interface of BRAF. , 2019, ACS chemical biology.

[52]  Roland Eils,et al.  Leveraging implicit knowledge in neural networks for functional dissection and engineering of proteins , 2019, Nature Machine Intelligence.

[53]  F. Gallou,et al.  Sustainability Challenges in Peptide Synthesis and Purification: From R&D to Production. , 2019, The Journal of organic chemistry.

[54]  Y. Zhang,et al.  Improving T Cell Receptor On-Target Specificity via Structure-Guided Design. , 2019, Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy.

[55]  Daniel J. Burnside,et al.  In Silico Engineering of Synthetic Binding Proteins from Random Amino Acid Sequences , 2018, iScience.

[56]  J. Green,et al.  Reciprocal Perspective for Improved Protein-Protein Interaction Prediction , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[57]  Virapong Prachayasittikul,et al.  PAAP: a web server for predicting antihypertensive activity of peptides. , 2018, Future medicinal chemistry.

[58]  J. Greenbaum,et al.  Improved methods for predicting peptide binding affinity to MHC class II molecules , 2018, Immunology.

[59]  V. Daggett,et al.  Validating Molecular Dynamics Simulations against Experimental Observables in Light of Underlying Conformational Ensembles. , 2018, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[60]  Daniel J. Burnside,et al.  The sensitivity of the yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, to acetic acid is influenced by DOM34 and RPL36A , 2017, PeerJ.

[61]  A. Ciulli,et al.  Structure‐Guided Design of Peptides as Tools to Probe the Protein–Protein Interaction between Cullin‐2 and Elongin BC Substrate Adaptor in Cullin RING E3 Ubiquitin Ligases , 2017, ChemMedChem.

[62]  Ashkan Golshani,et al.  Designing Anti-Zika Virus Peptides Derived from Predicted Human-Zika Virus Protein-Protein Interactions , 2017, bioRxiv.

[63]  Alessandra Carbone,et al.  BIS2Analyzer: a server for co-evolution analysis of conserved protein families , 2017, Nucleic Acids Res..

[64]  Norman E. Davey,et al.  SLiMSearch: a framework for proteome-wide discovery and annotation of functional modules in intrinsically disordered regions , 2017, Nucleic Acids Res..

[65]  Virapong Prachayasittikul,et al.  HemoPred: a web server for predicting the hemolytic activity of peptides. , 2017, Future medicinal chemistry.

[66]  Ashkan Golshani,et al.  Predicting novel protein-protein interactions between the HIV-1 virus and homo sapiens , 2016, 2016 IEEE EMBS International Student Conference (ISC).

[67]  Pierre Tufféry,et al.  PEP-FOLD3: faster de novo structure prediction for linear peptides in solution and in complex , 2016, Nucleic Acids Res..

[68]  Lenwood S. Heath,et al.  DeNovo: virus-host sequence-based protein-protein interaction prediction , 2016, Bioinform..

[69]  Jian Peng,et al.  Protein Secondary Structure Prediction Using Deep Convolutional Neural Fields , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[70]  Kumardeep Chaudhary,et al.  An in silico platform for predicting, screening and designing of antihypertensive peptides , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[71]  Bohdan Schneider,et al.  Protein flexibility in the light of structural alphabets , 2015, Front. Mol. Biosci..

[72]  Hasup Lee,et al.  GalaxyPepDock: a protein–peptide docking tool based on interaction similarity and energy optimization , 2015, Nucleic Acids Res..

[73]  Charlotte M. Deane,et al.  Current status and future challenges in T-cell receptor/peptide/MHC molecular dynamics simulations , 2015, Briefings Bioinform..

[74]  Hui Wang,et al.  Efficient prediction of human protein-protein interactions at a global scale , 2014, BMC Bioinformatics.

[75]  David W. Ritchie,et al.  KBDOCK 2013: a spatial classification of 3D protein domain family interactions , 2013, Nucleic Acids Res..

[76]  Carol S. Lim,et al.  Basics and recent advances in peptide and protein drug delivery. , 2013, Therapeutic delivery.

[77]  Ashkan Golshani,et al.  Short Co-occurring Polypeptide Regions Can Predict Global Protein Interaction Maps , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[78]  Massimiliano Pontil,et al.  PSICOV: precise structural contact prediction using sparse inverse covariance estimation on large multiple sequence alignments , 2012, Bioinform..

[79]  Zhihua Lin,et al.  QSAR study on angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor oligopeptides based on a novel set of sequence information descriptors , 2011, Journal of Molecular Modeling.

[80]  Roland L. Dunbrack,et al.  A smoothed backbone-dependent rotamer library for proteins derived from adaptive kernel density estimates and regressions. , 2011, Structure.

[81]  Ashkan Golshani,et al.  Binding Site Prediction for Protein-Protein Interactions and Novel Motif Discovery using Re-occurring Polypeptide Sequences , 2011, BMC Bioinformatics.

[82]  P. Karplus,et al.  A fresh look at the Ramachandran plot and the occurrence of standard structures in proteins , 2010, Biomolecular concepts.

[83]  Haiyan Liu,et al.  Fragment‐based local statistical potentials derived by combining an alphabet of protein local structures with secondary structures and solvent accessibilities , 2009, Proteins.

[84]  Vincent A. Voelz,et al.  Blind test of physics-based prediction of protein structures. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[85]  Yang Zhang,et al.  I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction , 2008, BMC Bioinformatics.

[86]  Gregory A Voth,et al.  Coarse-grained peptide modeling using a systematic multiscale approach. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[87]  Andrew Chatr-aryamontri,et al.  DOMINO: a database of domain–peptide interactions , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..

[88]  Albert Chan,et al.  PIPE: a protein-protein interaction prediction engine based on the re-occurring short polypeptide sequences between known interacting protein pairs , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.

[89]  Robert B. Russell,et al.  DILIMOT: discovery of linear motifs in proteins , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..

[90]  William Stafford Noble,et al.  Choosing negative examples for the prediction of protein-protein interactions , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.

[91]  T. Gibson,et al.  Systematic Discovery of New Recognition Peptides Mediating Protein Interaction Networks , 2005, PLoS biology.

[92]  C. Etchebest,et al.  A structural alphabet for local protein structures: Improved prediction methods , 2005, Proteins.

[93]  Alessandro Sette,et al.  Generating quantitative models describing the sequence specificity of biological processes with the stabilized matrix method , 2005, BMC Bioinformatics.

[94]  A. Liwo,et al.  Physics-based protein-structure prediction using a hierarchical protocol based on the UNRES force field: assessment in two blind tests. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[95]  Hai-Long Dong,et al.  Prediction of HLA-A2-restricted CTL epitope specific to HCC by SYFPEITHI combined with polynomial method. , 2005, World journal of gastroenterology.

[96]  Robert B. Russell,et al.  3did: interacting protein domains of known three-dimensional structure , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[97]  Fernando Albericio,et al.  From production of peptides in milligram amounts for research to multi-tons quantities for drugs of the future. , 2004, Current pharmaceutical biotechnology.

[98]  D. Baker,et al.  Design of a Novel Globular Protein Fold with Atomic-Level Accuracy , 2003, Science.

[99]  John Sidney,et al.  Examining the independent binding assumption for binding of peptide epitopes to MHC-I molecules , 2003, Bioinform..

[100]  T. Pawson,et al.  Assembly of Cell Regulatory Systems Through Protein Interaction Domains , 2003, Science.

[101]  M. Marahiel,et al.  Engineered Biosynthesis of the Peptide Antibiotic Bacitracin in the Surrogate Host Bacillus subtilis * , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[102]  R. Friesner,et al.  Evaluation and Reparametrization of the OPLS-AA Force Field for Proteins via Comparison with Accurate Quantum Chemical Calculations on Peptides† , 2001 .

[103]  J L Cleland,et al.  Emerging protein delivery methods. , 2001, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[104]  J. B. Collip,et al.  THE EFFECT OF PANCREATIC EXTRACT (INSULIN) ON NORMAL RABBITS , 1922 .

[105]  M. Baranwal,et al.  An Immunoinformatics Approach in Design of Synthetic Peptide Vaccine Against Influenza Virus. , 2020, Methods in molecular biology.

[106]  Debadyuti Ghosh,et al.  Peptides as drug delivery vehicles across biological barriers , 2017, Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation.

[107]  T. Hoffmann,et al.  Peptide therapeutics: current status and future directions. , 2015, Drug discovery today.

[108]  Li Di,et al.  Strategic Approaches to Optimizing Peptide ADME Properties , 2014, The AAPS Journal.

[109]  Josias H. Hamman,et al.  Oral Delivery of Peptide Drugs , 2012, BioDrugs.

[110]  Ashkan Golshani,et al.  Computational methods for predicting protein-protein interactions. , 2008, Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology.