Traffic-generated airborne particles in naturally ventilated multi-storey residential buildings of Singapore: Vertical distribution and potential health risks

Abstract The main objective of the study is to quantify the mass concentration exposure levels of fine traffic-generated particles (PM2.5) at various heights of typical multi-storey public housing buildings located in close proximity, i.e. within 30 m and along a busy major expressway in Singapore. The secondary objective is to compare the potential health risks of occupants in the buildings, associated with inhalation exposure of fine traffic-generated particulate matter, based on estimated dose rates and the lowest observed adverse effect levels (loael) at the various floors of these buildings. Two typical public housing buildings, both naturally ventilated residential apartment blocks, of point block configuration (22-storey) and slab block configuration (16-storey) were selected for the study. Particulate samples were collected for both mass and chemical analysis (OC/EC ratio) at three representative floors: the lower, the mid, and upper floors of the buildings. Key meteorological parameters such as wind speed, wind direction, ambient temperature, and relative humidity were also concurrently measured at the sampling locations. For the potential health risk analysis, the occupants have been divided into four age categories namely, infants, children (1 year), children (8–10 years) and adults. The analysis takes into account age-specific breathing rates, body weights for different age categories. Experimental results explicitly showed that PM2.5 mean particle mass concentration was highest at the midfloors of both buildings when compared to those measured at upper and lower floors during a typical day. Although the lower floors were closest to traffic emissions, the mean particle mass concentration was lower there than that at the midfloors, which could presumably be due to the interception of PM2.5 particles by tree leaves or the inflow of clean and drier air from higher altitude with lower aerosol burden mixing with the traffic-polluted air at the lower levels thus lowering the concentration at the lower floors similar to induced chimney effect or both. The upper floors had the least fine particulate matter mass concentration due to dilution following pronounced mixing of traffic-polluted air with ambient air. The only difference between both blocks is that at corresponding floors, the mass concentration levels for slab block is much higher than that of point block. This could be attributed to the configuration of the blocks. Observational data show the slab block tends to slow down the approaching wind thus allowing the accumulation of the fine traffic-generated particulate matter in front of the building. For point block, the HR values at the mid and lower floors suggest that occupants living in these floors experience 1.81 and 1.34 times more health risk, respectively, in contracting respiratory diseases when compared to those living at the upper floors for all age categories. Similarly, for the slab block, occupants living in the mid and lower floors had 1.62 and 1.28 times more risk, respectively, in contracting respiratory diseases when compared to those living at the upper floors for all age categories.

[1]  Lidia Morawska,et al.  The relationship between indoor and outdoor airborne particles in the residential environment , 2001 .

[2]  B. Wehner,et al.  Particle number size distributions in a street canyon and their transformation into the urban-air background: measurements and a simple model study , 2002 .

[3]  L. Morawska,et al.  Dispersion of particles from vehicle emissions around high- and low-rise buildings. , 2002, Indoor air.

[4]  David B. Kittelson,et al.  Diesel Aerosol Sampling in the Atmosphere , 2000 .

[5]  Werner A. Stahel,et al.  Aerosol emission in a road tunnel , 1997 .

[6]  Antonio Colombi,et al.  Height profile of some air quality markers in the urban atmosphere surrounding a 100 m tower building , 1998 .

[7]  Sukumar Devotta,et al.  Health risks of NO2, SPM and SO2 in Delhi (India) , 2005 .

[8]  Rajasekhar Balasubramanian,et al.  Comprehensive characterization of PM2.5 aerosols in Singapore , 2003 .

[9]  Jiming Hao,et al.  Vertical and horizontal profiles of airborne particulate matter near major roads in Macao, China , 2002 .

[10]  Abhishek Gupta,et al.  Physical characterization of particulate matter and ambient meteorological parameters at different indoor–outdoor locations in Singapore , 2007 .

[11]  L. Chan,et al.  Vertical dispersion of suspended particulates in urban area of Hong Kong , 2000 .

[12]  R Jelínek,et al.  Risk assessment of the common air pollutants in Teplice, Czech Republic. , 1998, Toxicology letters.

[13]  Gerald Spindler,et al.  Long-term size-segregated characterization of PM10, PM2.5, and PM1 at the IfT research station Melpitz downwind of Leipzig (Germany) using high and low-volume filter samplers , 2004 .

[14]  Günter Oberdörster,et al.  Ultrafine particles in the urban air: to the respiratory tract--and beyond? , 2002, Environmental health perspectives.

[15]  Alireza Afshari,et al.  Characterisation of particle emissions from the driving car fleet and the contribution to ambient and indoor particle concentrations , 2003 .

[16]  K. Donaldson,et al.  INFLAMMATION CAUSED BY PARTICLES AND FIBERS , 2002, Inhalation toxicology.

[17]  Asher,et al.  The International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) , 1998, Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology.

[18]  Gail Taylor,et al.  Effective Tree Species for Local Airquality Management , 2000, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

[19]  P. Butelli,et al.  Fine particulate (PM2.5–PM1) at urban sites with different traffic exposure , 2005 .

[20]  Lidia Morawska,et al.  A STUDY OF THE HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL PROFILE OF SUBMICROMETER PARTICLES IN RELATION TO A BUSY ROAD , 1999 .

[21]  Wayne R. Ott,et al.  Total human exposure , 1985 .

[22]  Roy M. Harrison,et al.  Sources and concentration of nanoparticles (<10 nm diameter) in the urban atmosphere , 2001 .

[23]  Hans-Christen Hansson,et al.  Inorganic, organic and macromolecular components of fine aerosol in different areas of Europe in relation to their water solubility , 1999 .

[24]  Christopher Yu Hang Chao,et al.  Residential indoor PM10 and PM2.5 in Hong Kong and the elemental composition , 2002 .

[25]  J. C. Cabada,et al.  Sources of Atmospheric Carbonaceous Particulate Matter in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania , 2002, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.