Turning the corner in fertility: high DNA integrity of boundary-following sperm.

We present a passive microfluidic sperm selection strategy that collects motile sperm based on their preference to follow boundaries and turn corners. Clinical assessment of selected human sperm from the device revealed a strong correlation between high DNA integrity and the tendency for sperm to follow boundaries. Human sperm with preference to follow boundaries on the left- or right-hand sides have higher (>51%) DNA integrity than straight swimmers and significantly higher (>67%) DNA integrity than sperm in raw semen. Boundary following behaviour offers a strategy to selecting sperm with the highest DNA integrity to improve the success rate of assisted reproduction.

[1]  A. Ciampi,et al.  Sperm DNA damage is associated with an increased risk of pregnancy loss after IVF and ICSI: systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2008, Human reproduction.

[2]  D. Le Lannou,et al.  Nuclear maturity and morphology of human spermatozoa selected by Percoll density gradient centrifugation or swim-up procedure. , 1988, Journal of reproduction and fertility.

[3]  S. Ng,et al.  Fertilizing ability of DNA-damaged spermatozoa. , 1999, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[4]  David Sinton,et al.  Two-dimensional slither swimming of sperm within a micrometre of a surface , 2015, Nature Communications.

[5]  T. Said,et al.  Effects of advanced selection methods on sperm quality and ART outcome: a systematic review. , 2011, Human reproduction update.

[6]  D. Mortimer.  Sperm preparation methods. , 2000, Journal of andrology.

[7]  D. Sinton,et al.  Rapid selection of sperm with high DNA integrity. , 2014, Lab on a chip.

[8]  Raymond E. Goldstein,et al.  Ciliary contact interactions dominate surface scattering of swimming eukaryotes , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  J E Swain,et al.  Thinking big by thinking small: application of microfluidic technology to improve ART. , 2013, Lab on a chip.

[10]  A. Agarwal,et al.  Role of sperm chromatin abnormalities and DNA damage in male infertility. , 2003, Human reproduction update.

[11]  A Zini,et al.  Influence of semen processing technique on human sperm DNA integrity. , 2000, Urology.

[12]  A. Coomarasamy,et al.  The effect of sperm DNA fragmentation on miscarriage rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2012, Human reproduction.

[13]  M. Mandrioli,et al.  The use of two density gradient centrifugation techniques and the swim-up method to separate spermatozoa with chromatin and nuclear DNA anomalies. , 2000, Human reproduction.

[14]  D. Sinton,et al.  Direct DNA Analysis with Paper-Based Ion Concentration Polarization. , 2015, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[15]  Savas Tasoglu,et al.  Microfluidics for sperm research. , 2015, Trends in biotechnology.

[16]  D. Sinton,et al.  Microfluidic assessment of swimming media for motility-based sperm selection. , 2015, Biomicrofluidics.

[17]  D. Sakkas.  Novel technologies for selecting the best sperm for in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. , 2013, Fertility and sterility.

[18]  Savas Tasoglu,et al.  Exhaustion of racing sperm in nature-mimicking microfluidic channels during sorting. , 2013, Small.

[19]  Piotr Garstecki,et al.  Escherichia coli swim on the right-hand side , 2005, Nature.

[20]  A. Gutiérrez-Adán,et al.  Long-Term Effects of Mouse Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection with DNA-Fragmented Sperm on Health and Behavior of Adult Offspring1 , 2008, Biology of reproduction.

[21]  D. Woolley,et al.  Motility of spermatozoa at surfaces. , 2003, Reproduction.

[22]  G. Gompper,et al.  Hydrodynamics of sperm cells near surfaces. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[23]  D. Woolley,et al.  A study of synchronisation between the flagella of bull spermatozoa, with related observations , 2009, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[24]  Jackson Kirkman-Brown,et al.  Human spermatozoa migration in microchannels reveals boundary-following navigation , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  R. Henkel,et al.  Sperm preparation for ART , 2003, Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E.

[26]  Comment on the article by J. Elgeti, U. B. Kaupp, and G. Gompper: hydrodynamics of sperm cells near surfaces. , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[27]  A Zini,et al.  Correlations between two markers of sperm DNA integrity, DNA denaturation and DNA fragmentation, in fertile and infertile men. , 2001, Fertility and sterility.

[28]  A. Zini,et al.  Sperm head morphology is related to high deoxyribonucleic acid stainability assessed by sperm chromatin structure assay. , 2009, Fertility and sterility.

[29]  R. Aitken,et al.  Significance of reactive oxygen species and antioxidants in defining the efficacy of sperm preparation techniques. , 1988, Journal of andrology.

[30]  D. Evenson,et al.  Sperm chromatin structure assay: its clinical use for detecting sperm DNA fragmentation in male infertility and comparisons with other techniques. , 2002, Journal of andrology.

[31]  David Sinton,et al.  Paper-Based Quantification of Male Fertility Potential. , 2016, Clinical chemistry.

[32]  C Gagnon,et al.  How spermatozoa come to be confined to surfaces. , 2003, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[33]  M. Eisenbach,et al.  Sperm guidance in mammals — an unpaved road to the egg , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.