Fully automated microvessel counting and hot spot selection by image processing of whole tumour sections in invasive breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Manual counting of microvessels is subjective and may lead to unacceptable interobserver variability, which may explain conflicting results. AIMS: To develop and test an automated method for microvessel counting and objective selection of the hot spot, based on image processing of whole sections, and to compare this with manual selection of a hot spot and counting of microvessels. METHODS: Microvessels were stained by CD31 immunohistochemistry in 10 cases of invasive breast cancer. The number of microvessels was counted manually in a subjectively selected hot spot, and also in the same complete tumour sections by interactive and automated image processing methods. An algorithm identified the hot spots from microvessel maps of the whole tumour section. RESULTS: No significant difference in manual microvessel counts was found between two observers within the same hot spot, and counts were significantly correlated. However, when the hot spot was reselected, significantly different results were found between repeated counts by the same observer. Counting all microvessels manually within the entire tumour section resulted in significantly different hot spots than manual counts in selected hot spots by the same observer. Within the entire tumour section no significant differences were found between the hot spots of the manual and automated methods using an automated microscope. The hot spot was found using an eight connective path search algorithm, was located at or near the border of the tumour, and (depending on the size of the hot spot) did not always contain the field with the largest number of microvessels. CONCLUSIONS: The automated counting of microvessels is preferable to the manual method because of the reduction in measurement time when the complete tumour is scanned, the greater accuracy and objectivity of hot spot selection, and the possibility of visual inspection and relocation of each measurement field afterwards.

[1]  N. Weidner.  Intratumor microvessel density as a prognostic factor in cancer. , 1995, The American journal of pathology.

[2]  H. Gundersen,et al.  Notes on the estimation of the numerical density of arbitrary profiles: the edge effect , 1977 .

[3]  S. Fox,et al.  Quantification of angiogenesis in solid human tumours: an international consensus on the methodology and criteria of evaluation. , 1996, European journal of cancer.

[4]  A. Howell,et al.  Assessment of tumour vascularity as a prognostic factor in lymph node negative invasive breast cancer. , 1993, European journal of cancer.

[5]  Chul Ahn,et al.  Endothelial area as a prognostic indicator for invasive breast carcinoma , 1996, Cancer.

[6]  A. Lee,et al.  Microvessel quantitation and prognosis in invasive breast carcinoma. , 1992, Human pathology.

[7]  J. Folkman.  Clinical Applications of Research on Angiogenesis , 1995 .

[8]  L. Ellis,et al.  The implications of angiogenesis for the biology and therapy of cancer metastasis , 1994, Cell.

[9]  M. Toi,et al.  Tumor angiogenesis is an independent prognostic indicator in primary breast carcinoma , 1993, International journal of cancer.

[10]  S. Fox.  Tumour angiogenesis and prognosis. , 1997, Histopathology.

[11]  Y. Chung,et al.  Microvessel quantitation in invasive breast cancer by staining for factor VIII-related antigen. , 1995, British Journal of Cancer.

[12]  Claudio Eccher,et al.  Microvessel density quantification in breast carcinomas. Assessment by light microscopy vs. a computer-aided image analysis system , 1995 .

[13]  L Piana,et al.  CD31 quantitative immunocytochemical assays in breast carcinomas. Correlation with current prognostic factors. , 1995, American journal of clinical pathology.

[14]  A. Srivastava,et al.  The prognostic significance of tumor vascularity in intermediate-thickness (0.76-4.0 mm thick) skin melanoma. A quantitative histologic study. , 1988, The American journal of pathology.

[15]  H. Sasaki,et al.  Tumour angiogenesis in prostatic carcinoma with and without bone marrow metastasis: A morphometric study , 1992, The Journal of pathology.

[16]  N. Weidner,et al.  Tumor microvessel density, p53 expression, tumor size, and peritumoral lymphatic vessel invasion are relevant prognostic markers in node-negative breast carcinoma. , 1994, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  D J Ruiter,et al.  Quantitative immunohistological analysis of the microvasculature in untreated human glioblastoma multiforme. Computer-assisted image analysis of whole-tumor sections. , 1994, Journal of neurosurgery.

[18]  F Pozza,et al.  Tumor angiogenesis: a new significant and independent prognostic indicator in early-stage breast carcinoma. , 1992, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[19]  K. Chew,et al.  COMMENT ON: TUMOR ANGIOGENESIS AS A PROGNOSTIC ASSAY FOR INVASIVE DUCTAL BREAST CARCINOMA. AUTHORS' REPLY , 1995 .

[20]  I. Ellis,et al.  Assessment of angiogenesis in breast carcinoma: an important factor in prognosis? , 1995, Human pathology.

[21]  J. Isola,et al.  Comparison of different immunohistochemical methods in the assessment of angiogenesis: lack of prognostic value in a group of 77 selected node-negative breast carcinomas. , 1995, Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc.

[22]  D G Altman,et al.  Correspondence Re: de Jong JS, van Diest PJ, and Baak JPA (1995). Methods in laboratory investigation: analysis of agreement rather than correlation in assessing heterogeneity and reproducibility of vessel counts in breast cancer. , 1996, Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology.

[23]  R. Hofmann-Wellenhof,et al.  Vascular architecture of melanocytic skin tumors. A quantitative immunohistochemical study using automated image analysis. , 1989, Pathology, research and practice.

[24]  H. W. Chalkley.  Method for the Quantitative Morphologic Analysis of Tissues , 1943 .

[25]  C Kurz,et al.  Microvessel density and vessel invasion in lymph‐node‐negative breast cancer: Effect on recurrence‐free survival , 1995, International journal of cancer.

[26]  J A Beliën,et al.  Counting mitoses by image processing in Feulgen stained breast cancer sections: the influence of resolution. , 1997, Cytometry.

[27]  D. Carney,et al.  Prognostic significance of microvessel density in lymph node negative breast carcinoma. , 1995, Human pathology.

[28]  J. Monson,et al.  Is the relationship between angiogenesis and metastasis in breast cancer real? , 1992, Surgical oncology.

[29]  Joe C. Adams,et al.  Biotin amplification of biotin and horseradish peroxidase signals in histochemical stains. , 1992, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[30]  A. Howell,et al.  TUMOUR ANGIOGENESIS AS A PROGNOSTIC MARKER IN INFILTRATING LOBULAR CARCINOMA OF THE BREAST , 1996, The Journal of pathology.

[31]  J. Folkman,et al.  Tumor angiogenesis and metastasis--correlation in invasive breast carcinoma. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[32]  Stephen B. Fox,et al.  COMMENTARY Tumour angiogenesis and prognosis , 1997, Histopathology.

[33]  D. Kardamakis,et al.  Angiogenesis and metastatic potential in breast carcinoma , 1996 .

[34]  D. Page,et al.  Angiogenesis in human breast carcinoma: what is the question? , 1995, Human pathology.

[35]  A. Harris,et al.  Quantitation and prognostic value of breast cancer angiogenesis: Comparison of microvessel density, Chalkley count, and computer image analysis , 1995, The Journal of pathology.

[36]  Brian H. Mayall,et al.  Re: Tumor Angiogenesis as a Prognostic Assay for Invasive Ductal Breast Carcinoma , 1995 .

[37]  D. Visscher,et al.  Prognostic significance of image morphometric microvessel enumeration in breast carcinoma. , 1993, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[38]  M. Brawer,et al.  Comparison of microscopic vascularity in benign and malignant prostate tissue. , 1993, Human pathology.

[39]  T K ten Kate,et al.  UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) A method for counting mitoses by image processing in Feulgen stained breast cancer sections , 2005 .

[40]  P. V. van Diest,et al.  Heterogeneity and reproducibility of microvessel counts in breast cancer. , 1995, Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology.

[41]  A. Harris,et al.  Angiogenesis, assessed by platelet/endothelial cell adhesion molecule antibodies, as indicator of node metastases and survival in breast cancer , 1992, The Lancet.

[42]  H. Heinzl,et al.  Quantitative immunohistochemistry of factor VIII-related antigen in breast carcinoma: a comparison of computer-assisted image analysis with established counting methods. , 1996, American journal of clinical pathology.

[43]  M. Brawer,et al.  Predictors of pathologic stage in prostatic carcinoma. The role of neovascularity , 1994, Cancer.

[44]  D J Ruiter,et al.  An improved procedure to quantify tumour vascularity using true colour image analysis. Comparison with the manual hot‐spot procedure in a human melanoma xenograft model , 1998, The Journal of pathology.

[45]  J. Folkman.  Tumor angiogenesis: therapeutic implications. , 1971, The New England journal of medicine.

[46]  R. Kerbel,et al.  Reciprocal paracrine interactions between tumour cells and endothelial cells: the 'angiogenesis progression' hypothesis. , 1996, European journal of cancer.

[47]  D. Mason,et al.  JC70: a new monoclonal antibody that detects vascular endothelium associated antigen on routinely processed tissue sections. , 1990, Journal of clinical pathology.