A New Approach for Creating Defined Geometries by Navigated Laser Ablation Based on Volumetric 3-D Data

This paper describes a new approach for laser bone treatment according to a preoperative plan. The advantages of using laser systems are the free choice of the cutting geometry and the possibility of bone treatment without any severe thermal damage. On the other hand, the control of bone removal depth is difficult. Due to the lack of haptical feedback, it is only possible to control the bone removal visually. In addition, by selecting wrong laser parameters and incorrect handling,the tissue can sustain thermal damage. To solve this problem, an approach of navigated and model-based calculation of depth ablation has been investigated. The focus of this paper was to verify the feasibility of precise and safe laser bone removal by combining navigation information with mathematical and volumetric modeling. For the mathematical modeling, known approaches are used. On the basis of CT data, cavities in a bovine bone were planned with a navigation system. With an optical measurement system, the position of the laser handpiece was calculated relative to the bone. Using a mathematical model, the theoretical cavity depth was calculated for each laser pulse and displayed on the navigation screen. Thereby, the material removal was determined in a volume model. With this information, five cavities were created by the laser using constant energy settings. A final measurement of the cavitiespsila depths showed an error of less than 1 mm.

[1]  Tim Lüth,et al.  Methoden und Verfahren zur Navigation in der dentalen Implantologie (Methods for Navigation in Dental Implantology) , 2002 .

[2]  J. Lustmann,et al.  Navigation surgery for dental implants: assessment of accuracy of the image guided implantology system. , 2004, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[3]  R Hibst,et al.  Experimental studies of the application of the Er:YAG laser on dental hard substances: II. Light microscopic and SEM investigations , 1989, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[4]  Akira Yanai ERBIUM-YAG LASER , 2002 .

[5]  J. Lustmann,et al.  Image-guided navigation system for placing dental implants. , 2004, Compendium of continuing education in dentistry.

[6]  R. Ewers,et al.  Basic research and 12 years of clinical experience in computer-assisted navigation technology: a review. , 2005, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[7]  Carsten Westendorff,et al.  Accuracy of navigation-guided socket drilling before implant installation compared to the conventional free-hand method in a synthetic edentulous lower jaw model. , 2005, Clinical oral implants research.

[8]  C Runte,et al.  Evaluation of accuracy of insertion of dental implants and prosthetic treatment by computer-aided navigation in minipigs. , 2003, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[9]  R Hibst,et al.  [Ablative effect of an Er:YAG laser on enamel and dentin]. , 1989, Deutsche zahnarztliche Zeitschrift.

[10]  Karl Stock,et al.  Comparison of Er:YAG and Er:YSGG laser ablation of dental hard tissues , 1997, European Conference on Biomedical Optics.

[11]  Martin Frenz,et al.  Bone-ablation mechanism using CO2 lasers of different pulse duration and wavelength , 1993 .

[12]  Sebastian Stopp,et al.  A new concept for navigated laser surgery , 2008, Lasers in Medical Science.

[13]  Jürgen Eichler,et al.  Die Strahlqualität von Lasern – Wie bestimmt man Beugungsmaßzahl und Strahldurchmesser in der Praxis? , 2004 .

[14]  Martin Werner,et al.  Bone tissue ablation with CO2 lasers at different pulse durations , 2005, European Conference on Biomedical Optics.

[15]  Raimund Hibst,et al.  Experimental studies of the application of the Er:YAG laser on dental hard substances: I. Measurement of the ablation rate , 1989, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[16]  Peter Hering,et al.  In vivo animal trials with a scanning CO2 laser osteotome , 2005, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[17]  O Schermeier,et al.  Automatic patient registration in computer assisted maxillofacial surgery. , 2002, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[18]  H. P. Berlien,et al.  LASER IN DER MEDIZIN , 1991 .

[19]  P. Hering,et al.  Wet bone ablation with mechanically Q-switched high-repetition-rate CO2 laser , 1998 .

[20]  H. Deppe,et al.  A new method for optimized laser treatment by laser focus navigation and distance visualization , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[21]  T. A. King,et al.  Erbium-YAG and holmium-YAG laser ablation of bone , 1990, Lasers in Medical Science.

[22]  Andrew D. Wiles,et al.  Accuracy assessment and interpretation for optical tracking systems , 2004, Medical Imaging: Image-Guided Procedures.

[23]  R. Franzen,et al.  Influence of the Pulse Duration of an Er:YAG Laser System on the Ablation Threshold of Dental Enamel , 2002, Lasers in Medical Science.

[24]  Boris Majaron,et al.  Heat diffusion and debris screening in Er:YAG laser ablation of hard biological tissues , 1998 .

[25]  Peter Hering,et al.  Ablation of hard bone tissue with pulsed CO2 lasers , 2005 .

[26]  Elzbieta Hassmann-Poznańska,et al.  [Laser myringotomy]. , 2002, Otolaryngologia polska = The Polish otolaryngology.