Negotiation over offspring care?--a positive response to partner-provisioning rate in great tits

Game theoretical models of biparental care predict that a change in work rate by one parent should be met by incomplete compensation by its partner. However, in empirical studies on biparental birds, there has been some inconsistency in the direction and extent of the response, and the mechanism behind it has so far been unclear. Parents could be responding directly to partner work rate or indirectly via chick begging. In this study of great tits (Parus major), the work rate of one parent was increased experimentally by augmenting the begging of the chicks with playback of extra begging calls whenever the parent visited the nest. The playback had no effect on the chicks' begging behavior, so any change in the focal parent's behavior was a direct response to its partner's work rate over a short timescale. An experimental increase in care by either male or female parent led to an increase (to a lesser extent) in the work rate of its partner, which is counter to the decrease predicted by partial compensation models. This seemingly paradoxical result may reflect decisions made exclusively over a short timescale and is in keeping with new theoretical work, which takes into account the information content of partner work rates. Copyright 2006.

[1]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  The Evolution of Parental Care , 2019 .

[2]  R. Fordham,et al.  Co‐ordinated food provisioning in the Little Shearwater Puffinus assimilis haurakiensis: a previously undescribed foraging strategy in the Procellariidae , 2008 .

[3]  R. Johnstone,et al.  Negotiation over Offspring Care—how Should Parents Respond to Each Other's Efforts? , 2006 .

[4]  Sean A. Rands,et al.  Spontaneous emergence of leaders and followers in foraging pairs , 2003, Nature.

[5]  G. Ruxton,et al.  Confidence intervals are a more useful complement to nonsignificant tests than are power calculations , 2003 .

[6]  G. Parker,et al.  Biparental care in house sparrows: negotiation or sealed bid? , 2002 .

[7]  G. Hill,et al.  Testosterone and the allocation of reproductive effort in male house finches (Carpodacus mexicanus) , 2000, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[8]  B. Sheldon,et al.  Differential allocation: tests, mechanisms and implications. , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[9]  H. Richner,et al.  Immunocompetence of nestling great tits in relation to rearing environment and parentage , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  Alasdair I Houston,et al.  Incorporating rules for responding into evolutionary games , 1999, Nature.

[11]  M. Petrie,et al.  Peacocks lek with relatives even in the absence of social and environmental cues , 1999, Nature.

[12]  N. Dingemanse,et al.  Parents and helpers compensate for experimental changes in the provisioning effort of others in the Arabian babbler , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[13]  S. Merino,et al.  Maternal energy expenditure does not change with flight costs or food availability in the pied flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca): costs and benefits for nestlings , 1999, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[14]  J. Wingfield,et al.  Endocrine influences on parental care during a short breeding season: testosterone and male parental care in Lapland longspurs (Calcarius lapponicus) , 1999, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[15]  N. Davies,et al.  Signals of need in parent–offspring communication and their exploitation by the common cuckoo , 1999, Nature.

[16]  K. Yasukawa,et al.  Response to playback of nestling begging in the red-winged blackbird,Agelaius phoeniceus , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[17]  N. Davies,et al.  Nestling cuckoos, Cuculus canorus, exploit hosts with begging calls that mimic a brood , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[18]  Henrik G. Smith,et al.  Begging affects parental effort in the pied flycatcher, Ficedula hypoleuca , 1997, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[19]  G. Lozano,et al.  Male plumage, paternal care and reproductive success in yellow warblers, Dendroica petechia , 1996, Animal Behaviour.

[20]  D. Westneat,et al.  Sex and parenting: the effects of sexual conflict and parentage on parental strategies. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[21]  Jonathan Wright,et al.  Male parental care in the orange-tufted sunbird: behavioural adjustments in provisioning and nest guarding effort , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[22]  A. Møller,et al.  Testosterone-induced depression of male parental behavior in the barn swallow: female compensation and effects on seasonal fitness , 1995, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[23]  E. Ketterson,et al.  Testosterone and Avian Life Histories: Effects of Experimentally Elevated Testosterone on Behavior and Correlates of Fitness in the Dark-Eyed Junco (Junco hyemalis) , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[24]  H. Godfray,et al.  Signalling of need by offspring to their parents , 1991, Nature.

[25]  I. Cuthill,et al.  Biparental care: short-term manipulation of partner contribution and brood size in the starling, Sturnus vulgaris , 1990 .

[26]  I. Cuthill,et al.  Manipulation of sex differences in parental care: the effect of brood size , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[27]  J. Lifjeld,et al.  Influence of Male and Female Quality on Clutch Size in Tits (Parus Spp.) , 1990 .

[28]  T. Slagsvold,et al.  Manipulations of male parental investment in polygynous pied flycatchers, Ficedula hypoleuca , 1990 .

[29]  I. Cuthill,et al.  Manipulation of sex differences in parental care , 1989, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[30]  J. Lifjeld,et al.  ULTIMATE ADJUSTMENT OF CLUTCH SIZE TO PARENTAL FEEDING CAPACITY IN A PASSERINE BIRD , 1988 .

[31]  N. Burley.  The Differential-Allocation Hypothesis: An Experimental Test , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[32]  R. Montgomerie,et al.  Risks and Rewards of Nest Defence by Parent Birds , 1988, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[33]  J. Wingfield,et al.  Effects of Experimental Manipulation of Testosterone Levels on Parental Investment and Breeding Success in Male House Sparrows , 1987 .

[34]  Ivan D. Chase,et al.  Cooperative and Noncooperative Behavior in Animals , 1980, The American Naturalist.

[35]  J. M. Smith.  Parental investment: A prospective analysis , 1977, Animal Behaviour.

[36]  D. Lack,et al.  Population Studies of Birds , 1967 .

[37]  A. Field.  Discovering statistics using SPSS for Windows. , 2000 .

[38]  S. Kranenbarg,et al.  Differential response by males and females to manipulation of partner contribution in the great tit (Parus major) , 2000 .

[39]  C. M. Lessells.  5. Sexual Conflict in Animals , 1999 .

[40]  R. Johnstone,et al.  Begging the question: are offspring solicitation behaviours signals of need? , 1997, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[41]  T. Redondo.  Avian Nest Defence: Theoretical Models and Evidence , 1989 .

[42]  C. M. Lessells,et al.  Unrepeatable repeatabilities: a common mistake , 1987 .

[43]  R. Trivers.  Parental investment and sexual selection , 1972 .