Acoustic Seabed Classification Systems

Abstract : In the last decade acoustic bottom classification devices have been developed which can routinely provide inferences of seabed texture and grain size or habitat while a vessel is underway. These devices can be attached to existing echosounders on vessels without affecting sounder operation, or to inexpensive fish finding echosounders, enabling real-time indications of bottom type after initial system calibration is made. Aspects of these acoustic bottom classification systems are broadly described. Topics covered are principles of operation, trials of the RoxAnn and QTC View systems, other commercially available systems, algorithms, usage, and approaches to classification. Data processing and calibration methods used by various authors are listed. It is important to note that acoustic seabed classification systems are essentially empirical devices which may work well for some bottoms but not others. To enable their more informed usage, some of the performance strengths and limitations of acoustic bottom classification systems are outlined.

[1]  Colin Ware,et al.  Interactive tools for the exploration and analysis of multibeam and other seafloor acoustic data , 1997 .

[2]  B.T. Prager,et al.  Bottom classification: operational results from QTC VIEW , 1995, 'Challenges of Our Changing Global Environment'. Conference Proceedings. OCEANS '95 MTS/IEEE.

[3]  G.E.O. Schiagintweit Real-time acoustic bottom classification for hydrography a field evaluation of RoxAnn , 1993, Proceedings of OCEANS '93.

[4]  L. Hamilton,et al.  Comparison of RoxAnn and QTC-View acoustic bottom classification system performance for the Cairns area, Great Barrier Reef, Australia , 1999 .

[5]  Robert A. McConnaughey,et al.  The effect of slope and vessel speed on the performance of a single beam acoustic seabed classification system , 2002 .

[6]  B. Castle ECHOplus Measurements in Hopavågen Bay, Norway , 2001 .

[7]  X. Lurton,et al.  Automated Sea-bed Classification System For Echo-Sounders , 1992, OCEANS 92 Proceedings@m_Mastering the Oceans Through Technology.

[8]  L. Hamilton Classification, grainsize relations and sediment distributions inferred from visual sediment descriptions on RAN Hydrographic Office bathymetry charts of the northern Great Barrier Reef lagoon , 1999 .

[9]  C. McKinney,et al.  Measurements of Backscattering of Sound from the Ocean Bottom , 1964 .

[10]  Fionn Murtagh,et al.  Multidimensional clustering algorithms , 1985 .

[11]  I. Sotheran,et al.  Mapping of marine benthic habitats using image processing techniques within a raster-based geographic information system , 1997 .

[12]  F. Dobson,et al.  Oceanographic Applications of Remote Sensing , 1995 .

[13]  Ian R. Young,et al.  Wind Generated Ocean Waves , 1999 .

[14]  David M. Paterson,et al.  Sedimentary Processes in the Intertidal Zone , 1998 .

[16]  C. Torrence,et al.  A Practical Guide to Wavelet Analysis. , 1998 .

[17]  Rudy J. Kloser,et al.  Remote sensing of seabed types in the Australian South East Fishery; development and application of normal incident acoustic techniques and associated 'ground truthing' , 2001 .

[18]  Ali S. Hadi,et al.  Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Chster Analysis , 1991 .

[19]  R. Francois,et al.  Sound absorption based on ocean measurements: Part I: Pure water and magnesium sulfate contributions , 1982 .

[20]  W. Chesterman,et al.  Bottom Backscattering near Grazing Incidence in Shallow Water , 1968 .

[21]  Peter J. Wright,et al.  An assessment of the acoustic survey technique, RoxAnn, as a means of mapping seabed habitat , 1997 .