On the optimization of the bus network design: An analytical approach based on the three-dimensional macroscopic fundamental diagram

Abstract Multiple factors can influence the public transport level of service. All take root in the network structure and the operating regime, i.e. how the bus lines are arranged atop the street network and how the service frequency is adjusted to meet urban mobility patterns. This is known as the bus network design problem and has been the subject of several studies. The problem is so challenging that most studies until now resort to strong assumptions such as a static description of the peak hour demand, homogeneous user behavior, and equal trip lengths. Potential effects of different types of user behavior and trip lengths patterns on the user and/or operator cost have not been investigated whatsoever. Moreover, none of the existing studies have considered the effects of bus network structure on private car users, the level of interactions between the modes, and the passenger mode choice that depends on traffic conditions. This paper aims to close this gap and provide a general framework considering multiple trip length patterns, two types of user behavior, and the effects that the bus network structure might have on the traffic performance and passenger mode choice. For modeling different trip length patterns, we use the trip length distribution as an intermediate level of abstraction. To capture complex modal interactions and quantify the operating speeds, we apply the recently proposed three-dimensional macroscopic fundamental diagram. We use the operating speed for each mode to determine the mode choice at the trip length level. This way, we are able to solve the optimal bus network design problem under the free-flow/saturated traffic conditions in an analytical way, while considering more realistic settings including a dynamic description of the peak hour demand, mixed traffic, and different mode choice decisions depending on trip lengths and walking preferences. Numerical analysis reveals that all the tested factors, including demand intensity, user behavior, and trip length patterns, have significant effects on the operator and user cost function. Results show that the probability of choosing any given mode follows certain distribution that varies across the trip length patterns, indicating the importance of modeling the mode choice at the trip length level. Furthermore, the results indicate that users can benefit if they are willing to adjust the number of transfers to minimize the walking distance at the origin and the destination. Moreover, we show that the optimal bus network design determined for the uniform trip pattern underestimates the number of required buses, which leads to passenger congestion at stops during the peak period. This, however, does not happen when we take into account the actual trip length distribution for the bus network design. A comparison with a simplified approach that considers the bus system only, reveals the value of accounting for the complex bi-modal interactions, especially for higher demand levels. Finally, we show that by allowing the design parameters to vary across cardinal directions we provide more flexibility for the bus system to serve the passenger demand while reducing the operator cost compared to the existing approaches.

[1]  Monica Menendez,et al.  Use of Microsimulation for Examination of Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram Hysteresis Patterns for Hierarchical Urban Street Networks , 2015 .

[2]  Marta C. González,et al.  Understanding individual human mobility patterns , 2008, Nature.

[3]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  A MIXED SPATIALLY CORRELATED LOGIT MODEL: FORMULATION AND APPLICATION TO RESIDENTIAL CHOICE MODELING , 2004 .

[4]  Francesc Robusté,et al.  Competitive transit network design in cities with radial street patterns , 2014 .

[5]  Carlos F. Daganzo,et al.  Structure of Competitive Transit Networks , 2009 .

[6]  Igor Dakic,et al.  On the modeling of passenger mobility for stochastic bi-modal urban corridors , 2020, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[7]  Wei Liu,et al.  Responsive bus dispatching strategy in a multi-modal and multi-directional transportation system: A doubly dynamical approach , 2019 .

[8]  Igor Dakic,et al.  On the use of Lagrangian observations from public transport and probe vehicles to estimate car space-mean speeds in bi-modal urban networks , 2018, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[9]  N. Geroliminis,et al.  A three-dimensional macroscopic fundamental diagram for mixed bi-modal urban networks , 2014 .

[10]  Nikolas Geroliminis,et al.  Macroscopic modelling and robust control of bi-modal multi-region urban road networks , 2017 .

[11]  Francesc Robusté,et al.  Bus network structure and mobility pattern: A monocentric analytical approach on a grid street layout , 2016 .

[12]  E M Holroyd,et al.  THE OPTIMUM BUS SERVICE: A THEORETICAL MODEL FOR A LARGE UNIFORM URBAN AREA , 1967 .

[13]  Carlos F. Daganzo,et al.  19th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic TheoryDesign and Implementation of Efficient Transit Networks: Procedure, Case Study and Validity Test , 2011 .

[14]  H. Oliver Gao,et al.  Optimal design of sustainable transit systems in congested urban networks: A macroscopic approach , 2017 .

[15]  Nan Zheng,et al.  Traffic performance and road space allocation in multimodal urban networks with an MFD representation , 2017 .

[16]  Yanfeng Ouyang,et al.  Continuum Approximation Approach to Bus Network Design under Spatially Heterogeneous Demand , 2014 .

[17]  Michael J. Cassidy,et al.  Scheduling lane conversions for bus use on city-wide scales and in time-varying congested traffic , 2018 .

[18]  C. Daganzo,et al.  Macroscopic relations of urban traffic variables: Bifurcations, multivaluedness and instability , 2011 .

[19]  Carlos F. Daganzo,et al.  How network structure can boost and shape the demand for bus transit , 2017 .

[20]  Nikolaos Geroliminis,et al.  Bus service design under demand diversion and dynamic roadway congestion based on aggregated network models , 2016 .

[21]  D. Levinson Network Structure and City Size , 2012, PloS one.

[22]  Yanfeng Ouyang,et al.  A Structured Flexible Transit System for Low-Demand Areas , 2011 .

[23]  M. Menéndez,et al.  Urban space consumption of cars and buses: an analytical approach , 2020 .

[24]  Nikolas Geroliminis,et al.  On the distribution of urban road space for multimodal congested networks , 2013 .

[25]  S. Ilgin Guler,et al.  Optimizing Transit Signal Priority Implementation along an Arterial , 2018, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

[26]  Omar J. Ibarra-Rojas,et al.  Planning, operation, and control of bus transport systems: A literature review , 2015 .

[27]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Capturing network properties with a functional form for the multi-modal macroscopic fundamental diagram , 2019, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological.

[28]  Gordon F. Newell,et al.  Some Issues Relating to the Optimal Design of Bus Routes , 1979 .

[29]  S. Ilgin Guler,et al.  Analytical evaluation of flexible-sharing strategies on multimodal arterials , 2018, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.

[30]  Bernard F. Byrne Public transportation line positions and headways for minimum user and system cost in a radial case , 1975 .

[31]  Carlos F. Daganzo,et al.  Optimal Transit Service atop Ring-radial and Grid Street Networks: A Continuum Approximation Design Method and Comparisons , 2015 .

[32]  J. Little A Proof for the Queuing Formula: L = λW , 1961 .

[33]  Monica Menendez,et al.  On the design of an optimal flexible bus dispatching system with modular bus units: Using the three-dimensional macroscopic fundamental diagram , 2021 .

[34]  Marta C. González,et al.  Estimating MFDs, trip lengths and path flow distributions in a multi-region setting using mobile phone data , 2020 .

[35]  Vikash V. Gayah,et al.  On the impacts of locally adaptive signal control on urban network stability and the Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram , 2014 .

[36]  Vikash V. Gayah,et al.  Clockwise Hysteresis Loops in the Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram , 2010 .

[37]  S. Ilgin Guler,et al.  Effects of bus operations on the traffic capacity of urban networks: A simulation study , 2016 .

[38]  Hai Yang,et al.  A universal distribution law of network detour ratios , 2018, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[39]  Monica Menendez,et al.  Exploratory Analysis of Signal Coordination Impacts on Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram , 2016 .

[40]  Monica Menendez,et al.  Analysis of Network Exit Functions for Various Urban Grid Network Configurations , 2015 .

[41]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Approximative Network Partitioning for MFDs from Stationary Sensor Data , 2019 .

[42]  Ludovic Leclercq,et al.  Bi-modal macroscopic traffic dynamics in a single region , 2020 .

[43]  Ludovic Leclercq,et al.  Macroscopic Fundamental Diagrams: A cross-comparison of estimation methods , 2014 .

[44]  Monica Menendez,et al.  Understanding traffic capacity of urban networks , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[45]  N. Geroliminis,et al.  An analytical approximation for the macropscopic fundamental diagram of urban traffic , 2008 .

[46]  Yu Mei,et al.  Optimal Design of Intersecting Bi-Modal Transit Networks in a Grid City , 2018 .

[47]  S. Ilgin Guler,et al.  Providing public transport priority in the perimeter of urban networks: A bimodal strategy , 2019, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[48]  Monica Menendez,et al.  Evaluating the effects of passenger occupancy dynamics on a bi- modal perimeter control , 2019 .

[49]  Gordon F. Newell,et al.  Optimal Parameters for a Coordinated Rail and Bus Transit System , 1977 .

[50]  Monica Menendez,et al.  Empirics of multi-modal traffic networks – Using the 3D macroscopic fundamental diagram , 2017 .

[51]  Monica Menendez,et al.  Extending Morris method for qualitative global sensitivity analysis of models with dependent inputs , 2017, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[52]  Monica Menendez,et al.  Analysis of one-way and two-way street configurations on urban grid networks , 2019 .

[53]  Nikolas Geroliminis,et al.  A systematic analysis of multimodal transport systems with road space distribution and responsive bus service , 2018 .

[54]  F. Verni,et al.  Diversity and environmental distribution of the cosmopolitan endosymbiont “Candidatus Megaira” , 2019, Scientific Reports.