Comprehensive Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced 3D Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Breast With Fat/Water Separation and High Spatiotemporal Resolution Using Radial Sampling, Compressed Sensing, and Parallel Imaging

Objectives The aim of this study was to assess the applicability of Dixon radial volumetric encoding (Dixon-RAVE) for comprehensive dynamic contrast-enhanced 3D magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast using a combination of radial sampling, model-based fat/water separation, compressed sensing, and parallel imaging. Materials and Methods In this Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act–compliant prospective study, 24 consecutive patients underwent bilateral breast MRI, including both conventional fat-suppressed and non–fat-suppressed precontrast T1-weighted volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE). Afterward, 1 continuous Dixon-RAVE scan was performed with the proposed approach while the contrast agent was injected. This scan was immediately followed by the acquisition of 4 conventional fat-saturated VIBE scans. From the comprehensive Dixon-RAVE data set, different image contrasts were reconstructed that are comparable to the separate conventional VIBE scans. Two radiologists independently rated image quality, conspicuity of fibroglandular tissue from fat (FG), and degree of fat suppression (FS) on a 5-point Likert-type scale for the following 3 comparisons: precontrast fat-suppressed (pre-FS), precontrast non–fat-suppressed (pre-NFS), and dynamic fat-suppressed (dyn-FS) images. Results When scores were averaged over readers, Dixon-RAVE achieved significantly higher (P < 0.001) degree of fat suppression compared with VIBE, for both pre-FS (4.25 vs 3.67) and dyn-FS (4.10 vs 3.46) images. Although Dixon-RAVE had lower image quality score compared with VIBE for the pre-FS (3.56 vs 3.67, P = 0.490), the pre-NFS (3.54 vs 3.88, P = 0.009), and the dyn-FS images (3.06 vs 3.67, P < 0.001), acceptable or better diagnostic quality was achieved (score ≥ 3). The FG score for Dixon-RAVE in comparison to VIBE was significantly higher for the pre-FS image (4.23 vs 3.85, P = 0.044), lower for the pre-NFS image (3.98 vs 4.25, P = 0.054), and higher for the dynamic fat-suppressed image (3.90 vs 3.85, P = 0.845). Conclusions Dixon-RAVE can serve as a one-stop-shop approach for comprehensive T1-weighted breast MRI with diagnostic image quality, high spatiotemporal resolution, reduced overall scan time, and improved fat suppression compared with conventional imaging.

[1]  Håkan Ahlström,et al.  Three‐point dixon method enables whole‐body water and fat imaging of obese subjects , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  R. R. Ernst,et al.  Application of Fourier Transform Spectroscopy to Magnetic Resonance , 1966 .

[3]  Ricardo Otazo,et al.  Comparison of conventional DCE‐MRI and a novel golden‐angle radial multicoil compressed sensing method for the evaluation of breast lesion conspicuity , 2017, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[4]  Sungheon Kim,et al.  Golden‐angle radial sparse parallel MRI: Combination of compressed sensing, parallel imaging, and golden‐angle radial sampling for fast and flexible dynamic volumetric MRI , 2014, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  G H Glover,et al.  Three‐point dixon technique for true water/fat decomposition with B0 inhomogeneity correction , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  Ryan J Bosca,et al.  Novel High Spatiotemporal Resolution Versus Standard-of-Care Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI: Comparison of Image Quality , 2017, Investigative radiology.

[7]  Wei Huang,et al.  A feasible high spatiotemporal resolution breast DCE-MRI protocol for clinical settings. , 2012, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[8]  Guangbin Wang,et al.  Influence of scan duration on the estimation of pharmacokinetic parameters for breast lesions: a study based on CAIPIRINHA-Dixon-TWIST-VIBE technique , 2015, European Radiology.

[9]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Nonuniform fast Fourier transforms using min-max interpolation , 2003, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[10]  Qun Chen,et al.  Optimal k‐space sampling for dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI with an application to MR renography , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Feasibility of Gadofosveset-Enhanced Steady-State Magnetic Resonance Angiography of the Peripheral Vessels at 3 Tesla With Dixon Fat Saturation , 2008, Investigative radiology.

[12]  Hans H Schild,et al.  Dynamic bilateral contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: trade-off between spatial and temporal resolution. , 2005, Radiology.

[13]  Yuan Le,et al.  Development and evaluation of TWIST Dixon for dynamic contrast‐enhanced (DCE) MRI with improved acquisition efficiency and fat suppression , 2012, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[14]  Olaf Dössel,et al.  An Optimal Radial Profile Order Based on the Golden Ratio for Time-Resolved MRI , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  Peter Boesiger,et al.  Array compression for MRI with large coil arrays , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  C. Geppert,et al.  Application of time‐resolved angiography with stochastic trajectories (twist)‐dixon in dynamic contrast‐enhanced (dce) breast mri , 2013, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[17]  Daniel K. Sodickson,et al.  Towards Routine Clinical Use of Radial Stack-of-Stars 3D Gradient-Echo Sequences for Reducing Motion Sensitivity , 2014 .

[18]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Clinical application of 3D VIBECAIPI-DIXON for non-enhanced imaging of the pancreas compared to a standard 2D fat-saturated FLASH. , 2014, Clinical imaging.

[19]  M. Lustig,et al.  Compressed sensing for chemical shift‐based water–fat separation , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  Wendy B DeMartini,et al.  A Review of Current Evidence-Based Clinical Applications for Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2008, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[21]  Li Feng,et al.  Influence of temporal regularization and radial undersampling factor on compressed sensing reconstruction in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of the breast , 2016, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[22]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  A Novel Approach to Contrast-Enhanced Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Screening: High-Resolution Ultrafast Dynamic Imaging , 2014, Investigative radiology.

[23]  Li Feng,et al.  Free‐breathing volumetric fat/water separation by combining radial sampling, compressed sensing, and parallel imaging , 2017, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[24]  Peter Börnert,et al.  Chemical shift encoding‐based water–fat separation methods , 2014, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[25]  K. T. Block,et al.  Simple Method for Adaptive Gradient-Delay Compensation in Radial MRI , 2010 .

[26]  K. Pinker,et al.  Fat saturation in dynamic breast MRI at 3 Tesla: is the Dixon technique superior to spectral fat saturation? A visual grading characteristics study , 2014, European Radiology.