Role of trabecular morphology in the etiology of age-related vertebral fractures

SummaryOsteoporotic compression fractures of the spine differ from most other age-related fractures in that they usually are associated with minimal trauma and with loads no greater than those encountered during normal activities of daily living. With aging and osteoporosis, there is progressive resorption of bone, resulting in reductions in bone density, thinning of trabeculae, and loss of trabecular contiguity. These changes in trabecular bone structure are associated with losses in bone strength which are disproportionate to the reductions in bone mass alone. To explain this disproportionate loss of bone strength, the prevailing opinion is that density reductions in the vertebral centrum are accompanied by a reduction in the number of trabeculae, by preferential resorption of horizontal trabeculae, and by hypertrophy of the remaining vertical trabeculae. To evaluate this view of vertebral morphology, we performed three-dimensional stereological analysis of trabecular bone extracted from midsagittal sections of first lumbar vertebral bodies from 12 donors spanning an age of 27–81 years. We found that both the number (R2 = 0.63,P < 0.01) and thickness (R2 = 0.91,P < 0.01) of trabeculae decreased linearly with density (as expressed by bone volume fraction) whereas the spacing between the trabeculae (R2 = 0.61,P < 0.01) increased reciprocally. There were more vertical trabeculae with transverse trabeculae at all densities, and the number of vertical trabeculae changed with density at twice the rate of the number of transverse trabeculae (P < 0.001). These data do not support the prevailing view that there is preferential resorption of horizontal trabeculae or hypertrophy of the remaining vertical trabeculae. Bone density was also a strong (R2 = 0.90,P < 0.01) power law function of the ratio of trabecular thickness to mean intertrabecular spacing. From buckling theory, the critical buckling load of a trabecula is related to this ratio of trabecular thickness to effective length. The changes in trabecular morphology observed with decreasing bone density thus pose a “triple threat” to the strength and stability of vertebral trabecular bone, as not only are there fewer trabeculae, but the remaining trabeculae are both thinner and longer.

[1]  F. Prêteux,et al.  Automatic quantification of vertebral cancellous bone remodeling during aging , 2005, Anatomia Clinica.

[2]  A Viidik,et al.  Correlation between the compressive strength of iliac and vertebral trabecular bone in normal individuals. , 1985, Bone.

[3]  H. Bohr,et al.  Bone mineral content of femoral bone and the lumbar spine measured in women with fracture of the femoral neck by dual photon absorptiometry. , 1983, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[4]  C. Casuccio.  An Introduction to the Study of Osteoporosis (Biochemical and Biophysical Research in Bone Ageing) , 1962, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[5]  L. Mosekilde,et al.  Biomechanical competence of vertebral trabecular bone in relation to ash density and age in normal individuals. , 1987, Bone.

[6]  H. Genant,et al.  Bone mineral content in early-postmenopausal and postmenopausal osteoporotic women: comparison of measurement methods. , 1986, Radiology.

[7]  G. H. Bell,et al.  Variations in strength of vertebrae with age and their relation to osteoporosis , 2005, Calcified Tissue Research.

[8]  P. J. Atkinson.  Variation in trabecular structure of vertebrae with age , 2005, Calcified Tissue Research.

[9]  J. Galante,et al.  Physical properties of trabecular bone , 2005, Calcified Tissue Research.

[10]  A. Parfitt,et al.  Trabecular bone architecture in the pathogenesis and prevention of fracture. , 1987, The American journal of medicine.

[11]  F. Henschke,et al.  Einflu\ von Mechanik und Alter auf den Spongiosaumbau in Lendenwirbelkörpern und im Schenkelhals , 1977, Virchows Archiv A.

[12]  R. Mann,et al.  Characterization of microstructural anisotropy in orthotropic materials using a second rank tensor , 1984 .

[13]  T. Lloyd,et al.  Assessment of the risk of vertebral fracture in menopausal women. , 1987, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[14]  W. Hayes,et al.  The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure. , 1977, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[15]  R. B. Ashman,et al.  Elastic modulus of trabecular bone material. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  D D Moyle,et al.  Correlation of mechanical properties of vertebral trabecular bone with equivalent mineral density as measured by computed tomography. , 1988, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[17]  L. Mosekilde.  Age-related changes in vertebral trabecular bone architecture--assessed by a new method. , 1988, Bone.

[18]  R F Kilcoyne,et al.  Ability of four different techniques of measuring bone mass to diagnose vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women , 1987, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[19]  H. Saunders,et al.  Book Reviews : AN INTRODUCTION TO THE MECHANICS OF SOLIDS S. H. Crandall; N.C. Dahl; and T. J. Lardner McGraw-Hill Book Co. , New York, N. Y. (1972) , 1975 .

[20]  Y. Fung.  A first course in continuum mechanics , 1969 .

[21]  O Lindahl,et al.  Mechanical properties of dried defatted spongy bone. , 1976, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[22]  T Hansson,et al.  The Relation Between Bone Mineral Content, Experimental Compression Fractures, and Disc Degeneration in Lumbar Vertebrae , 1981, Spine.

[23]  S. Boden,et al.  Quantitative computed tomography reflects vertebral fracture morbidity in osteopenic patients. , 1989, Orthopedics.

[24]  Steinbach Hl.  THE ROENTGEN APPEARANCE OF OSTEOPOROSIS. , 1964 .

[25]  M. Eder.  Der Strukturumbau der Wirbelspongiosa , 2004, Virchows Archiv für pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und für klinische Medizin.

[26]  L. M. Orive.  Quantifying ‘pattern’: A stereological approach , 1976, Journal of microscopy.

[27]  L. Mosekilde.  Age-Related Loss of Vertebral Trabecular Bone Mass and Structure — Biomechanical Consequences , 1990 .

[28]  L. Mosekilde,et al.  Normal vertebral body size and compressive strength: relations to age and to vertebral and iliac trabecular bone compressive strength. , 1986, Bone.

[29]  Staffan Eriksson,et al.  Prediction of vertebral strength by dual photon absorptiometry and quantitative computed tomography , 1989, Calcified Tissue International.

[30]  H. Steinbach.  THE ROENTGEN APPEARANCE OF OSTEOPOROSIS. , 1964, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[31]  F. Prêteux,et al.  Measurement of anisotropic vertebral trabecular bone loss during aging by quantitative image analysis , 1988, Calcified Tissue International.

[32]  L. Mosekilde.  Iliac crest trabecular bone volume as predictor for vertebral compressive strength, ash density and trabecular bone volume in normal individuals. , 1988, Bone.

[33]  W. Hayes,et al.  Prediction of vertebral body compressive fracture using quantitative computed tomography. , 1985, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[34]  P Brinckmann,et al.  Prediction of the compressive strength of vertebral bodies of the lumbar spine by quantitative computed tomography , 1988, Skeletal radiology.

[35]  W. J. Whitehouse.  The quantitative morphology of anisotropic trabecular bone , 1974, Journal of microscopy.

[36]  A. M. Parfitt,et al.  Age-related structural changes in trabecular and cortical bone: Cellular mechanisms and biomechanical consequences , 2006, Calcified Tissue International.

[37]  T. Hansson,et al.  The Bone Mineral Content and Ultimate Compressive Strength of Lumbar Vertebrae , 1980, Spine.

[38]  E. Dill,et al.  An Introduction to the Mechanics of Solids , 1972 .

[39]  H J Gundersen,et al.  Star volume of marrow space and trabeculae of the first lumbar vertebra: sampling efficiency and biological variation. , 1989, Bone.

[40]  F. Henschke,et al.  [The influence of mechanical forces and age on the remodelling of the spongy bone in lumbar vertebrae and in the neck of the femur. A structural analysis (author's transl)]. , 1977, Virchows Archiv A Pathological Anatomy and Histology.

[41]  M. Kleerekoper,et al.  Relationships between surface, volume, and thickness of iliac trabecular bone in aging and in osteoporosis. Implications for the microanatomic and cellular mechanisms of bone loss. , 1983, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[42]  R. Heaney,et al.  The natural history of vertebral osteoporosis. Is low bone mass an epiphenomenon? , 1992, Bone.

[43]  R. Weinstein,et al.  Decreased trabecular width and increased trabecular spacing contribute to bone loss with aging. , 1987, Bone.

[44]  P Brinckmann,et al.  Prediction of the compressive strength of human lumbar vertebrae. , 1989, Clinical biomechanics.

[45]  S. H. Kan,et al.  Epidemiology of vertebral fractures in women. , 1989, American journal of epidemiology.

[46]  P. Saville,et al.  A quantitative approach to simple radiographic diagnosis of osteoporosis: its application to the osteoporosis of rheumatoid arthritis. , 1967, Arthritis and rheumatism.