Retrograde percutaneous access for kidney internal splint stent catheter placement in pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty: avoiding stent removal in the operating room.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Laparoscopic pyeloplasty has become increasingly used in the pediatric population for ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction. When choosing laparoscopic pyeloplasty, it is common to leave a Double-J ureteral stent across the anastomosis. In adult practice, this stent is easily removed in the office during follow-up; however, in pediatrics, cystoscopy and stent removal necessitates a trip back to the operating room. We report a novel method for placing a Kidney Internal Splint Stent (KISS) catheter, which can then be removed in the office during follow-up. METHODS The UPJ is dismembered, spatulated, and the new lateral edges are anastomosed as usual. With the renal pelvis still open, a STING needle is passed through the epigastric midline port. The laparoscope is used to visualize an appropriate posterior calix and direct the needle through the calix and out the back of the patient. A 7F vascular dilator is then threaded over the needle in retrograde fashion and into the collecting system. A 4F or 6F KISS catheter is then threaded through the dilator and down the ureter. The dilator is removed and the surgery is then finished according to the surgeon's preference. RESULTS We have placed this catheter in nine children without difficulties or intraoperative complications. Mean age was 8 years. All stents were otherwise removed at an average of 13 days in the office without difficulty. Three patients had problems with intermittently poor drainage necessitating flushing; in one of these patients, a recurrence of the UPJ obstruction developed. CONCLUSION A laparoscopic approach for KISS catheter placement is a technically feasible and advantageous technique when placing a stent for a pyeloplasty repair. This eliminates a trip back to the operating room for stent removal in the pediatric population and likely decreases bladder irritation.

[1]  D. Bägli,et al.  Outcome analysis and cost comparison between externalized pyeloureteral and standard stents in 470 consecutive open pyeloplasties. , 2008, Journal of Urology.

[2]  A. Lorenzo,et al.  Insertion of an internal-external nephroureteral stent during pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty: description of the technique. , 2008, Urology.

[3]  V. Jayanthi,et al.  Which is better--retroperitoneoscopic or laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children? , 2007, The Journal of urology.

[4]  Abdul Majid Rana,et al.  Management strategies and results for severely encrusted retained ureteral stents. , 2007, Journal of endourology.

[5]  M. L. Samuelson,et al.  Usefulness of short-term retrievable ureteral stent in pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty. , 2007, The Journal of urology.

[6]  M. Bhandari,et al.  Is antegrade stenting superior to retrograde stenting in laparoscopic pyeloplasty? , 2004, The Journal of urology.

[7]  Louis R Kavoussi,et al.  Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: the first 100 cases. , 2002, The Journal of urology.

[8]  M. Cain,et al.  Nephrostomy tube drainage with pyeloplasty: is it necessarily a bad choice? , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[9]  P. Mouriquand,et al.  The use of a multipurpose stent in children. , 1997, British journal of urology.

[10]  M. Hicks,et al.  A review of radiologically guided percutaneous nephrostomies in 303 patients. , 1997, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[11]  J. Corman,et al.  Ureteropelvic junction repair: stent and vent. , 1995, The Journal of urology.

[12]  M. Maizels,et al.  Use of kidney internal splint/stent (KISS) catheter in urinary diversion after pyeloplasty. , 1993, Urology.

[13]  G. Onik,et al.  Retrorenal colon: implications for percutaneous diskectomy. , 1989, Radiology.

[14]  S. Skoog,et al.  The posterolateral and the retrorenal colon: implication in percutaneous stone extraction. , 1985, The Journal of urology.