A microbial identification framework for risk assessment.

Micro-organisms are increasingly used in a variety of products for commercial uses, including cleaning products. Such microbial-based cleaning products (MBCP) are represented as a more environmentally-friendly alternative to chemically based cleaning products. The identity of the micro-organisms formulated into these products is often considered confidential business information and is not revealed or it is only partly revealed (i.e., identification to the genus, not to the species). That paucity of information complicates the evaluation of the risk associated with their use. The accurate taxonomic identification of those micro-organisms is important so that a suitable risk assessment of the products can be conducted. To alleviate difficulties associated with adequate identification of micro-organisms in MBCP and other products containing micro-organisms, a microbial identification framework for risk assessment (MIFRA) has been elaborated. It serves to provide guidance on a polyphasic tiered approach, combining the data obtained from the use of various methods (i.e., polyphasic approach) combined with the sequential selection of the methods (i.e., tiered) to achieve a satisfactory identity of the micro-organism to an acceptable taxonomic level. The MIFRA is suitable in various risk assessment contexts for micro-organisms used in any commercial product.

[1]  Harry B. McGee,et al.  Hemorrhagic colitis associated with a rare Escherichia coli serotype , 1983 .

[2]  Thomas H Segall-Shapiro,et al.  Creation of a Bacterial Cell Controlled by a Chemically Synthesized Genome , 2010, Science.

[3]  T. Hansen,et al.  Rhodopseudomonas sulfidophila, nov. spec., a new species of the purple nonsulfur bacteria , 2004, Archiv für Mikrobiologie.

[4]  P. Reeves,et al.  Escherichia coli K12 regains its O antigen. , 1994, Microbiology.

[5]  J. Craig Venter,et al.  Genome Transplantation in Bacteria: Changing One Species to Another , 2007, Science.

[6]  P. Kämpfer,et al.  Prokaryotic taxonomy in the sequencing era--the polyphasic approach revisited. , 2012, Environmental microbiology.

[7]  D. Raoult,et al.  A polyphasic strategy incorporating genomic data for the taxonomic description of novel bacterial species. , 2014, International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology.

[8]  Frank M. Aarestrup,et al.  Rapid and Easy In Silico Serotyping of Escherichia coli Isolates by Use of Whole-Genome Sequencing Data , 2015, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[9]  D. G. Gibson,et al.  Design and synthesis of a minimal bacterial genome , 2016, Science.

[10]  Natalia N. Ivanova,et al.  1,003 reference genomes of bacterial and archaeal isolates expand coverage of the tree of life , 2017, Nature Biotechnology.

[11]  O. Prakash,et al.  Polyphasic approach of bacterial classification — An overview of recent advances , 2007, Indian Journal of Microbiology.

[12]  A. Hiraishi,et al.  Intrageneric Structure of the Genus Rhodobacter: Transfer of Rhodobacter sulfidophilus and Related Marine Species to the Genus Rhodovulum gen. nov. , 1994 .

[13]  E. Velázquez,et al.  Historical evolution and current status of the taxonomy of genus Pseudomonas. , 2009, Infection, genetics and evolution : journal of molecular epidemiology and evolutionary genetics in infectious diseases.

[14]  P. Kuhnert,et al.  Rapid and accurate identification of Escherichia coli K-12 strains , 1995, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[15]  P. Schierack,et al.  Solid-phase microbead array for multiplex O-serotyping of Escherichia coli , 2017, Microchimica Acta.

[16]  R. Colwell Polyphasic Taxonomy of the Genus Vibrio: Numerical Taxonomy of Vibrio cholerae, Vibrio parahaemolyticus, and Related Vibrio Species , 1970, Journal of bacteriology.

[17]  I. Sutcliffe Challenging the anthropocentric emphasis on phenotypic testing in prokaryotic species descriptions: rip it up and start again , 2015, Front. Genet..

[18]  A Densmore,et al.  Photonic wire biosensor microarray chip and instrumentation with application to serotyping of Escherichia coli isolates. , 2013, Optics express.

[19]  W. Whitman,et al.  Report of the ad hoc committee for the re-evaluation of the species definition in bacteriology. , 2002, International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology.

[20]  Susana Ferreira,et al.  Insights in the pathogenesis and resistance of Arcobacter: A review , 2015, Critical reviews in microbiology.

[21]  Gianni Liti,et al.  Sequence Diversity, Reproductive Isolation and Species Concepts in Saccharomyces , 2006, Genetics.

[22]  Amanda L. Jones,et al.  The future of taxonomy. , 2012, Advances in applied microbiology.

[23]  S. Abbott,et al.  Bacterial Identification for Publication: When Is Enough Enough? , 2002, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[24]  M. Aouni,et al.  Typing of Human Enterovirus by Partial Sequencing of VP2 , 2007, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[25]  Paul Bridge,et al.  Deposit of microbial strains in public service collections as part of the publication process to underpin good practice in science , 2014, SpringerPlus.

[26]  Guo-Ping Zhao,et al.  Prokaryotic systematics in the genomics era , 2011, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek.

[27]  P. de Vos,et al.  Polyphasic Taxonomy , a Consensus Approach to Bacterial Systematics , 1996 .

[28]  George M. Garrity,et al.  Then and now: a systematic review of the systematics of prokaryotes in the last 80 years , 2013, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek.

[29]  Bas E. Dutilh,et al.  Microbial taxonomy in the post-genomic era: Rebuilding from scratch? , 2014, Archives of Microbiology.

[30]  G. Garrity A New Genomics-Driven Taxonomy of Bacteria and Archaea: Are We There Yet? , 2016, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[31]  K. Konstantinidis,et al.  The bacterial species definition in the genomic era , 2006, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[32]  J. Chun,et al.  Integrating genomics into the taxonomy and systematics of the Bacteria and Archaea. , 2014, International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology.

[33]  P. Vandamme,et al.  Time to revisit polyphasic taxonomy , 2014, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek.

[34]  R. Beiko Microbial malaise: how can we classify the microbiome? , 2015, Trends in microbiology.

[35]  W. Ludwig,et al.  Notes on the characterization of prokaryote strains for taxonomic purposes. , 2010, International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology.

[36]  J. Imhoff,et al.  Rearrangement of the Species and Genera of the Phototrophic “Purple Nonsulfur Bacteria” , 1984 .