Evaluation of Liquid Atomization and Spray Drift Reduction of Hydraulic Nozzles with Four Spray Adjuvant Solutions

The droplet size distribution following pesticide application practices can significantly impact droplet drift and non-target organisms (animals and plants). However, the relationship among liquid sheet breakup, drop formation, and droplet drift is an area that has been studied over the past 65 years but is still not fully understood. The objectives of this study were severalfold: to examine the liquid sheet breakup following the use of different adjuvants (sodium dodecyl sulfate, aerosol OT, and silicone at 1%) and their effects on the drift via three commonly used commercial spray nozzles (XR, AIXR, and TXVK). The spray sheet and initial droplet size spectrum for each spray was detected by a particle image velocimetry (PIV) system, and the drift for each treatment was measured in a wind tunnel. The nozzle type and the spray solution were found to significantly affect the liquid sheet breakup characteristics. AIXR produced large droplets, and TXVK with short liquid sheet length produced more small droplets. All adjuvants used in these experiments increased the formation of large droplets upon atomization while simultaneously reducing driftable fines (e.g., drops %<150 µm). The drift potential can be reduced by up to 66.1% when switching from a fine spray quality (TXVK) to a coarse spray quality (AIXR). The SDS adjuvant provided the most effective drift reduction for XR and TXVK nozzles showing reduced drift potential by 69.2% and 66.3%, respectively, while the silicone adjuvant showed the largest drift reduction for AIXR of 78.3%. The correlation between the liquid sheet length and DV0.5 was positive for XR and TXVK nozzles, and there was a significant positive correlation between %<150 µm and drift potential for all nozzles. This work suggests that the drift can be reduced significantly by changing the nozzle type and adding pesticide adjuvant into spray solution, which provided data support for the drift reduction of plant protection drones.

[1]  Y. Lan,et al.  Characteristics of unmanned aerial spraying systems and related spray drift: A review , 2022, Frontiers in Plant Science.

[2]  Y. Lan,et al.  Drift Evaluation of a Quadrotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Sprayer: Effect of Liquid Pressure and Wind Speed on Drift Potential Based on Wind Tunnel Test , 2021, Applied Sciences.

[3]  M. Leili,et al.  Risk assessment of imidacloprid and dichlorvos associated with dermal and inhalation exposure in cucumber greenhouse applicators: A cross-sectional study in Hamadan, Iran , 2021, International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry.

[4]  W. C. Hoffmann,et al.  Field evaluation of spray drift and environmental impact using an agricultural unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) sprayer. , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[5]  Peng Liang,et al.  Liquid Sheet Breakup Mode and Droplet Size of Free Opposed Impinging Jets by Particle Image Velocimetry , 2020 .

[6]  C. Tinet,et al.  Assessment of spray drift potential reduction for hollow-cone nozzles: Part 1. Classification using indirect methods. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[7]  W. C. Hoffmann,et al.  Using laser diffraction to measure agricultural sprays: Common sources of error when making measurements , 2018 .

[8]  Yubin Lan,et al.  Current status and trends of plant protection UAV and its spraying technology in China , 2018 .

[9]  Wang Haiyang,et al.  Wind tunnel experimental study on droplet drift reduction by a conical electrostatic nozzle for pesticide spraying , 2017 .

[10]  Jie Ju,et al.  Controlling liquid splash on superhydrophobic surfaces by a vesicle surfactant , 2017, Science Advances.

[11]  J. C. van de Zande,et al.  Wind tunnel measurements and model predictions for estimating spray drift reduction under field conditions , 2017 .

[12]  F. Fishel,et al.  [PI263] Worker Protection Standard: Application Exclusion Zone (AEZ) , 2016 .

[13]  Rodolfo G. Chechetto,et al.  Determining the drift potential of Venturi nozzles compared with standard nozzles across three insecticide spray solutions in a wind tunnel. , 2016, Pest management science.

[14]  Emilio Gil,et al.  Influence of wind velocity and wind direction on measurements of spray drift potential of boom sprayers using drift test bench , 2015 .

[15]  G. Dorr,et al.  农用喷头雾化粒径测试方法比较及分布函数拟合 = Measurement comparison and fitted distribution equation of droplet size for agricultural nozzles , 2014 .

[16]  Q. Du,et al.  Breakup characteristics of power-law liquid sheets formed by two impinging jets , 2014 .

[17]  Jim Hanan,et al.  A comparison of initial spray characteristics produced by agricultural nozzles , 2013 .

[18]  Sara Mostafalou,et al.  Pesticides and human chronic diseases: evidences, mechanisms, and perspectives. , 2013, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[19]  S. Koger,et al.  Toxicants and Environmental Health: A Psychological Issue , 2012 .

[20]  Soo-Jeong Lee,et al.  Acute Pesticide Illnesses Associated with Off-Target Pesticide Drift from Agricultural Applications: 11 States, 1998–2006 , 2011, Environmental health perspectives.

[21]  Yanbo Huang,et al.  Analysis of Impact of Various Factors on Downwind Deposition Using a Simulation Method , 2010 .

[22]  M. Kohno,et al.  Experimental and analytical investigation of liquid sheet breakup characteristics , 2009 .

[23]  David Nuyttens,et al.  Effects on pesticide spray drift of the physicochemical properties of the spray liquid , 2009, Precision Agriculture.

[24]  David Nuyttens,et al.  Influence of nozzle type and size on drift potential by means of different wind tunnel evaluation methods , 2009 .

[25]  Walter Steurbaut,et al.  Project to assess current approach and knowledge with a view to develop a Guidance document for pesticide exposure assessment , 2009 .

[26]  V. Bergeron Designing intelligent fluids for controlling spray applications , 2003 .

[27]  C. Tuck,et al.  How surface tension of surfactant solutions influences the characteristics of sprays produced by hydraulic nozzles used for pesticide application , 2001 .

[28]  P. Petrov,et al.  The generalization of the Sutherland equation for continuously deforming surfaces , 1998 .

[29]  J. Maybank,et al.  FIELD MEASUREMENT OF DROPLET DRIFT FROM GROUND SPRAYERS. I. SAMPLING, ANALYTICAL, AND DATA INTEGRATION TECHNIQUES , 1978 .

[30]  J. B. Byass,et al.  Spray drift from a tractor-powered field sprayer† , 1977 .

[31]  Meimei Wang,et al.  Wettability on plant leaf surfaces and its effect on pesticide efficiency , 2018 .

[32]  Bao Rui,et al.  Droplet size distribution of aerial nozzle for plant protection in wind tunnel and flight conditions , 2016 .

[33]  D. Nuyttens,et al.  Experimental study of factors influencing the risk of drift from field sprayers, Part 1: Meteorological conditions , 2006 .

[34]  C. R. Glass,et al.  Drift classification of boom sprayers based on single nozzle measurements in a wind tunnel. , 2000 .