Hysterectomy and socioeconomic position in Rome, Italy

Study objective: There exists conflicting evidence regarding the higher risk of hysterectomy among women of a lower educational and economic level. This study aims to assess whether in Italy socioeconomic level is related to hysterectomy undertaken for different medical reasons. Design: An area based index was used to assign socieconomic status (SES; four levels defined) to 3141 women (aged 35 years or older) who underwent a hysterectomy in 1997 and were residing in Rome. Data were taken from hospital discharge records. Direct age standardised hospitalisation rates by SES level were calculated for overall hysterectomies and for those performed for either malignant or non-malignant causes. Statistical differences were detected using the ratios of standardised rates and the test for linear trend. Main results: The hysterectomy rate was 36.7 per 10 000 women aged 35 years or more. Hysterectomy for uterine leiomyoma accounted for 41% of all operations and was more frequent among women aged 35–49 years than for those aged 50 years or more (crude rates: 28.6 and 7.7 per 10 000, respectively). The risk of hysterectomy was 35% higher for the lowest SES group, compared with the highest group. No association was found between SES and hysterectomy rates for malignant causes, although less affluent women in age group 35–49 years had 87% higher risk of hysterectomy compared with most affluent women. The inverse association between SES and hysterectomy rates attributable to non-malignant causes was statistically significant for women aged 35–49 years but not for those aged 50 years or more. Conclusions: The inverse relation between hysterectomy and SES is largely attributable to benign disorders of the uterus, namely leiomyoma and prolapse. More affluent women may have a greater uptake of less invasive techniques for removing uterine leiomyoma compared with less affluent women, who are more likely to undergo unnecessary hysterectomies irrespective of their reproductive age.

[1]  M. Reiser,et al.  Embolization of uterine fibroids , 2004, Abdominal Imaging.

[2]  P. Law,et al.  Interstitial thermo-ablation under MRI guidance for the treatment of fibroids , 2000, Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology.

[3]  M. Broder,et al.  The Appropriateness of Recommendations for Hysterectomy , 2000, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[4]  F Forastiere,et al.  Inequality in health: socioeconomic differentials in mortality in Rome, 1990-95. , 1999, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[5]  G. Cesaroni,et al.  [Health care inequalities: hospitalization and socioeconomic position in Rome]. , 1999, Epidemiologia e prevenzione.

[6]  D. O'Connor,et al.  Predictors of hysterectomy: an Australian study. , 1999, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[7]  J. Danesh,et al.  Postcodes as useful markers of social class: population based study in 26 000 British households. , 1999, BMJ.

[8]  T. Tulandi,et al.  Endoscopic myomectomy. Laparoscopy and hysteroscopy. , 1999, Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America.

[9]  N. Marks,et al.  Socioeconomic status differences in hormone therapy. , 1998, American journal of epidemiology.

[10]  J Bound,et al.  Use of census-based aggregate variables to proxy for socioeconomic group: evidence from national samples. , 1998, American journal of epidemiology.

[11]  A. Scialli.  Alternatives to hysterectomy for benign conditions. , 1998, International journal of fertility and women's medicine.

[12]  A Coulter,et al.  Managing demand at the interface between primary and secondary care , 1998, BMJ.

[13]  J. Lansac,et al.  Indications for hysterectomy. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  J. Madans,et al.  Epidemiology of hysterectomy in the United States: demographic and reproductive factors in a nationally representative sample. , 1997, Journal of women's health.

[15]  Rate of hysterectomy is lower among female doctors and lawyers' wives , 1997, BMJ.

[16]  E. Barrett-Connor,et al.  Hysterectomy, oophorectomy, and heart disease risk factors in older women. , 1997, American journal of public health.

[17]  Gynaecological correlates of hysterectomy in Danish women. , 1997, International journal of epidemiology.

[18]  Kramer Mg,et al.  Hysterectomy: indications, alternatives and predictors. , 1997 .

[19]  R. Luoto,et al.  Socioeconomic variations in hysterectomy: evidence from a linkage study of the Finnish hospital discharge register and population census. , 1997, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[20]  R. Lilford,et al.  Hysterectomy: will it pay the bills in 2007? , 1997, BMJ.

[21]  R. Reiter,et al.  Hysterectomy: indications, alternatives and predictors. , 1997, American family physician.

[22]  S. Aro,et al.  Private medicine and socioeconomic differences in the rates of common surgical procedures in Finland. , 1996, Health policy.

[23]  J. Neaton,et al.  Socioeconomic differentials in mortality risk among men screened for the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial: I. White men. , 1996, American journal of public health.

[24]  A. Settnes,et al.  Hysterectomy in a Danish cohort. Prevalence, incidence and socio‐demographic characteristics , 1996, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[25]  John Bound,et al.  On the Validity of Using Census Geocode Characteristics to Proxy Individual Socioeconomic Characteristics , 1995 .

[26]  D. Kuh,et al.  Socioeconomic variation in admission for diseases of female genital system and breast in a national cohort aged 15-43 , 1995, BMJ.

[27]  J. Kaprio,et al.  Cardiovascular Morbidity in Relation to Ovarian Function After Hysterectomy , 1995, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[28]  R. Barbieri,et al.  Progesterone: A critical role in the pathogenesis of uterine myomas , 1995, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[29]  R H Brook,et al.  Geographic variation in rates of selected surgical procedures within Los Angeles County. , 1995, Health services research.

[30]  H. Peterson,et al.  Hysterectomy in the United States, 1988‐1990 , 1994, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[31]  A. Coulter,et al.  Patients' preferences and general practitioners' decisions in the treatment of menstrual disorders. , 1994, Family practice.

[32]  S. Haas,et al.  Should uterine size be an indication for surgical intervention in women with myomas? , 1993, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[33]  P. Langenberg,et al.  The socioeconomic correlates of hysterectomies in the United States. , 1993, American journal of public health.

[34]  K McPherson,et al.  The epidemiology of hysterectomy: Findings in a large cohort study , 1992, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[35]  N. Krieger.  Overcoming the absence of socioeconomic data in medical records: validation and application of a census-based methodology. , 1992, American journal of public health.

[36]  M. Bracher,et al.  Correlates of hysterectomy in Australia. , 1992, Social science & medicine.

[37]  E. Pedrinis,et al.  EFFECT OF INFORMATION CAMPAIGN BY THE MASS MEDIA ON HYSTERECTOMY RATES , 1988, The Lancet.

[38]  A. Coulter,et al.  Do British women undergo too many or too few hysterectomies? , 1988, Social science & medicine.

[39]  D. Grimes,et al.  Hysterectomy in the United States , 1983, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[40]  P. Clifford,et al.  Small-area variations in the use of common surgical procedures: an international comparison of New England, England, and Norway. , 1982, The New England journal of medicine.

[41]  D. Thompson,et al.  Prevalence of prior hysterectomy in the Seattle-Tacoma area. , 1980, American journal of public health.

[42]  C. Ballard.  Therapeutic abortion and sterilization by vaginal hysterectomy. , 1974, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[43]  J. E. Jameson.  Inverse care law. , 1971, Lancet.

[44]  J T Hart,et al.  THE INVERSE CARE LAW , 1971 .