ARL/CARL Joint Task Force on Research Data Services: Final Report

The Association of Research Libraries (ARL)/Canadian Association of Research Libraries (CARL) Joint Task Force on Research Data Services formed in 2020 with a two-fold purpose: (1) to demonstrate and commit to the roles research libraries have in stewarding research data and as part of institution-wide research support services and (2) to guide the development of resources for the ARL and CARL memberships in advancing their organizations as collaborative partners with respect to research data services in the context of FAIR (findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable) data principles and the US National Academies’ Open Science by Design framework. Research libraries will be successful in meeting these objectives if they act collectively and are deeply engaged with disciplinary communities. The task force formed three working groups of data practitioners, representing a wealth of expertise, to research the institutional landscape and policy environment in both the US and Canada. This report presents the task force’s recommendations for the roles of research libraries with regard to research data principles, policies, and approaches to managing research data. The report also offers strategies for discipline-specific research data approaches, priorities for automation of processes, economic models to scale and sustain shared resources, prioritization of research data to steward, and decision-making rubrics.

[1]  Christopher Frederick Isambard Blumzon,et al.  Data Storage. , 2019, Handbook of experimental pharmacology.

[2]  Alex Garnett,et al.  The Fast and the FRDR: Improving Metadata for Data Discovery in Canada , 2020, Publ..

[3]  Brian Lavoie,et al.  The realities of Research Data Management - Part Two: Scoping the university RDM service bundle , 2017 .

[4]  Johnston Lisa The DCN Curation Workflow , 2021 .

[5]  Brian F. Lavoie,et al.  Social interoperability in research support: cross-campus partnerships and the university research enterprise , 2020 .

[6]  Carl Eklund,et al.  National Institute for Standards and Technology , 2009, Encyclopedia of Biometrics.

[7]  Maryann E. Martone,et al.  A tool for assessing alignment of biomedical data repositories with open, FAIR, citation and trustworthy principles , 2021 .

[8]  Thomas Hauser,et al.  Research Data Curation: A Framework for an Institution-Wide Services Approach , 2018 .

[9]  Danielle Cooper,et al.  Data Communities: A New Model for Supporting STEM Data Sharing , 2019 .

[10]  Policy,et al.  Open Science by Design , 2018 .

[11]  Tero Alstola,et al.  Research Data , 2019, Judeans in Babylonia.

[12]  M. Hudson,et al.  The CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance , 2020, Data Sci. J..

[13]  Ricky Erway,et al.  Starting the Conversation: University-Wide Research Data Management Policy. , 2013 .

[14]  Kristin Briney Strategic Planning for Research Data Services , 2016 .

[15]  Sarah Lippincott,et al.  Mapping the Current Landscape of Research Library Engagement with Emerging Technologies in Research and Learning , 2020 .

[16]  Inna Kouper,et al.  Research Data Services Maturity in Academic Libraries , 2017 .

[17]  Division on Earth,et al.  Life-Cycle Decisions for Biomedical Data: The Challenge of Forecasting Costs , 2020 .

[18]  Learn Guidance for Developing a Research Data Management(RDM) Policy , 2017 .

[19]  Joshua Borycz,et al.  Implementing FAIR data for people and machines: Impacts and implications - results of a research data community workshop , 2020, Inf. Serv. Use.