Combining sudomotor nerve impulse estimation with fMRI to investigate the central sympathetic response to nausea

The skin conductance (SC) signal is one of the most important non-invasive indirect measures of autonomic outflow. Several mathematical models have been proposed in the literature to characterize specific SC features. In this work, we present a method for the estimation of central control of sudomotor nerve impulse (SMI) function using SC. The method is based on a differential formulation decomposed into two first order differential equations. We validate our estimation framework by applying it on an experimental protocol where eleven motion sickness-prone subjects were exposed to a nauseogenic visual stimulus while SC and fMRI signals were recorded. Our results show an expected significant increase in the mean amplitude of SMI peaks during the highest reported nausea, as well as a decreasing trend during recovery, which was not evident for skin conductance level. Importantly, SMI/fMRI analysis found a negative association between SMI and fMRI signal in orbitofrontal, dorsolateral prefrontal, and posterior insula cortices, consistent with previous studies correlating brain fMRI and microneurographic signals.

[1]  E. Muth Motion and space sickness: Intestinal and autonomic correlates , 2006, Autonomic Neuroscience.

[2]  J. Golding Motion sickness susceptibility questionnaire revised and its relationship to other forms of sickness , 1998, Brain Research Bulletin.

[3]  Sylvia D. Kreibig,et al.  Autonomic nervous system activity in emotion: A review , 2010, Biological Psychology.

[4]  Cheree James,et al.  Real-time imaging of cortical areas involved in the generation of increases in skin sympathetic nerve activity when viewing emotionally charged images , 2012, NeuroImage.

[5]  Luca Citi,et al.  Electrodermal activity processing: A convex optimization approach , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[6]  E. Gordon,et al.  Separating individual skin conductance responses in a short interstimulus-interval paradigm , 2005, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[7]  H. Critchley,et al.  Neural Activity Relating to Generation and Representation of Galvanic Skin Conductance Responses: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  E. Brown,et al.  Static and dynamic autonomic response with increasing nausea perception. , 2011, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[9]  Cheree James,et al.  Identification of sites of sympathetic outflow at rest and during emotional arousal: concurrent recordings of sympathetic nerve activity and fMRI of the brain. , 2013, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[10]  W. Boucsein Electrodermal activity, 2nd ed. , 2012 .

[11]  M. Dawson,et al.  The electrodermal system , 2007 .

[12]  Kyungmo Park,et al.  The brain circuitry underlying the temporal evolution of nausea in humans. , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[13]  Uri Hasson,et al.  The relationship between BOLD signal and autonomic nervous system functions: implications for processing of "physiological noise". , 2011, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[14]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Time-series analysis for rapid event-related skin conductance responses , 2009, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[15]  Katsunori Matsuoka,et al.  Autonomic responses during motion sickness induced by virtual reality. , 2007, Auris, nasus, larynx.

[16]  C. Rennie,et al.  Decomposing skin conductance into tonic and phasic components. , 1997, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[17]  Sergio Cerutti,et al.  Brain Circuitry Supporting Multi-Organ Autonomic Outflow in Response to Nausea. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.