A combined sensory-instrumental tool for apple quality evaluation

Abstract A combined approach for perceptible quality profiling of apples based on sensory and instrumental techniques was developed. This work studied the correlation between sensory and instrumental data, and defined proper models for predicting sensory properties through instrumental measurements. Descriptive sensory analysis performed by a trained panel was carried out during two consecutive years, on a total of 27 apple cultivars assessed after two months postharvest storage. The 11 attributes included in the sensory vocabulary discriminated among the different apple cultivars by describing their sensory properties. Simultaneous instrumental profiling including colorimeter, texture analyser (measuring mechanical and acoustic parameters) and basic chemical measurements, provided a description of the cultivars consistent with the sensory profiles. Regression analyses showed effective predictive models for all sensory attributes (Q2 ≥ 0.8), except for green flesh colour and astringency, that were less effective (Q2 = 0.5 for both). Interesting relationships were found between taste perception and flesh appearance, and the combination of chemical and colorimeter data led to the development of an effective prediction model for sweet taste. Thus, the innovative sensory-instrumental tool described here can be proposed for the reliable prediction of apple sensory properties.

[1]  Franco Biasioli,et al.  Sensory and instrumental profiling of 18 apple cultivars to investigate the relation between perceived quality and odour and flavour , 2012 .

[2]  L. Duizer.  A review of acoustic research for studying the sensory perception of crisp, crunchy and crackly textures , 2001 .

[3]  Christopher M. Triggs,et al.  Eating quality standards for apples based on consumer preferences , 2008 .

[4]  M. Scott Howarth,et al.  Electromyography of the masticatory muscles can detect variation in the mechanical and sensory properties of apples , 2009 .

[5]  Robert B Jordan,et al.  Dry-matter—a better predictor of the post-storage soluble solids in apples? , 2003 .

[6]  Herbert Stone,et al.  Sensory Evaluation Practices , 1985 .

[7]  R. Dixon,et al.  Proanthocyanidins--a final frontier in flavonoid research? , 2005, The New phytologist.

[8]  F. A. Gunson,et al.  Influence of Texture on Taste: Insights Gained During Studies of Hardness, Juiciness, and Sweetness of Apple Fruit , 2006 .

[9]  Artur Zdunek,et al.  New contact acoustic emission detector for texture evaluation of apples. , 2010 .

[10]  John Prescott,et al.  MULTIMODAL CHEMOSENSORY INTERACTIONS AND PERCEPTION OF FLAVOR , 2012 .

[11]  F. Harker,et al.  Texture of fresh fruit , 2010 .

[12]  E Hoehn,et al.  Efficacy of instrumental measurements for determination of minimum requirements of firmness, soluble solids, and acidity of several apple varieties in comparison to consumer expectations , 2003 .

[13]  A. Plotto,et al.  Characterization of 'Gala' Apple Aroma and Flavor: Differences between Controlled Atmosphere and Air Storage , 1999 .

[14]  Ronan Symoneaux,et al.  Relationship between sensory analysis, penetrometry and visible–NIR spectroscopy of apples belonging to different cultivars , 2003 .

[15]  Conor M. Delahunty,et al.  Descriptive sensory analysis: past, present and future , 2001 .

[16]  J. Jobling,et al.  A comparison of ethylene production, maturity and controlled atmosphere storage life of Gala, Fuji and Lady Williams apples (Malus domestica, Borkh.) , 1995 .

[17]  G. Echeverría,et al.  PANEL CONSONANCE IN THE SENSORY EVALUATION OF APPLE ATTRIBUTES: INFLUENCE OF MEALINESS ON SWEETNESS PERCEPTION , 2008 .

[18]  M. Bourne.  Food Texture and Viscosity: Concept and Measurement , 2002 .

[19]  Micah M. Murray,et al.  The Neural Bases of Multisensory Processes , 2011 .

[20]  F. A. Gunson,et al.  Sensory interpretation of instrumental measurements 1: texture of apple fruit , 2002 .

[21]  F. A. Gunson,et al.  Sensory evaluation by small postharvest teams and the relationship with instrumental measurements of apple texture , 2011 .

[22]  A. Szczesniak.  Texture is a sensory property , 2002 .

[23]  Carolyn F. Ross,et al.  Relationship between instrumental and sensory determination of apple and pear texture. , 2010 .

[24]  D. Cox,et al.  An Analysis of Transformations , 1964 .

[25]  I. Jan,et al.  INFLUENCE OF STORAGE DURATION ON PHYSICO-CHEMICAL CHANGES IN FRUIT OF APPLE CULTIVARS , 2012 .

[26]  Nnadozie Oraguzie,et al.  Postharvest assessment of fruit quality parameters in apple using both instruments and an expert panel , 2009 .

[27]  M. Hertog,et al.  Postharvest softening of apple (Malus domestica) fruit: A review , 2002 .

[28]  J. Palmer,et al.  Fruit dry matter concentration: a new quality metric for apples. , 2010, Journal of the science of food and agriculture.

[29]  R. Hellens,et al.  Transcriptional analysis of apple fruit proanthocyanidin biosynthesis , 2012, Journal of experimental botany.

[30]  P. Brockhoff,et al.  Relating consumer evaluation of apple freshness to sensory and physico-chemical measurements , 2007 .

[31]  Halliday J.H. MacFie,et al.  Relationships between perceived sensory properties and major preference directions of 12 varieties of apples from the Southern Hemisphere , 1996 .

[32]  M. Fructuoso,et al.  Apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.) , 2010 .

[33]  D. Small.  Flavor is in the brain , 2012, Physiology & Behavior.

[34]  F. A. Gunson,et al.  Sensory interpretation of instrumental measurements 2: sweet and acid taste of apple fruit , 2002 .

[35]  Sara R. Jaeger,et al.  The case for fruit quality: an interpretive review of consumer attitudes, and preferences for apples , 2003 .

[36]  P. Casquero,et al.  Influence of storage conditions on the sensory quality of a high acid apple , 2010 .

[37]  Sara R. Jaeger,et al.  Consumer preferences for fresh and aged apples: a cross-cultural comparison , 1998 .

[38]  Julian F. V. Vincent,et al.  The quantification of crispness , 1998 .

[39]  Judith Pfeiffer,et al.  Biosynthesis of flavan 3-ols by leucoanthocyanidin 4-reductases and anthocyanidin reductases in leaves of grape (Vitis vinifera L.), apple (Malus x domestica Borkh.) and other crops. , 2006, Plant physiology and biochemistry : PPB.

[40]  Riccardo Velasco,et al.  Assessment of apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.) fruit texture by a combined acoustic-mechanical profiling strategy , 2011 .

[41]  F. Escher,et al.  Importance and consumer perception of freshness of apples , 2006 .

[42]  I. Jan,et al.  INFLUENCE OF STORAGE DURATION ON PHYSICO-CHEMICAL CHANGES IN FRUIT OF APPLE CULTIVARS , 2012 .

[43]  A. Allan,et al.  Metabolic and ge e express on a alysi of ppl ( Malus × domestica ) carotenogenesis , 2012 .

[44]  Nele De Belie,et al.  Crispness judgement of royal gala apples based on chewing sounds , 2000 .

[45]  M. L. Corollaro,et al.  Sensory profiling of apple: Methodological aspects, cultivar characterisation and postharvest changes , 2013 .

[46]  R. Velasco,et al.  A candidate gene based approach validates Md-PG1 as the main responsible for a QTL impacting fruit texture in apple (Malus x domestica Borkh) , 2013, BMC Plant Biology.

[47]  Luis Izquierdo,et al.  Segmentation of food consumers according to their correlations with sensory attributes projected on preference spaces , 2008 .

[48]  W. E. van de Weg,et al.  QTL dynamics for fruit firmness and softening around an ethylene-dependent polygalacturonase gene in apple (Malus×domestica Borkh.) , 2010, Journal of experimental botany.