Representation, Swing, and Bias in U.S. Presidential Elections, 1872-1988
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Gary King,et al. Systematic Consequences of Incumbency Advantage in the U.S. House Elections , 1991 .
[2] Measuring the Consequences of Delegate Selection Rules in Presidential Nominations , 1990, The Journal of Politics.
[3] Robert Browning,et al. Democratic Representation and Partisan Bias in Congressional Elections , 1987, American Political Science Review.
[4] G. Jacobson,et al. The Marginals Never Vanished: Incumbency and Competition in Elections to the U.S. House OfRepresentatives, 1952-1982 , 1987 .
[5] Gary King,et al. How Not to Lie with Statistics: Avoiding Common Mistakes in Quantitative Political Science , 1986 .
[6] R. Niemi,et al. The Swing Ratio: An Explanation and an Assessment , 1986 .
[7] John H. Aldrich,et al. Linear probability, logit and probit models , 1984 .
[8] Stephen J. Wayne. The Road to The White House The Politics of Presidential Elections , 1979 .
[9] Rein Taagepera,et al. Seats and votes: A generalization of the cube law of elections , 1973 .
[10] E. Tufte. The Relationship between Seats and Votes in Two-Party Systems , 1973, American Political Science Review.
[11] D. Hill,et al. The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws , 1969 .