TRIAD zoning in Quebec: Experiences and results after 5 years

The TRIAD approach to forest management involves dividing the forest into 3 zones, each with its own management objectives, but with the overall goal of increasing the ecological and economic sustainability of the forest. For the past 5 years, we have been experimenting with TRIAD zoning in central Quebec, incorporating social interests into the original concept of TRIAD management. Results generally indicate that this approach is economically viable, socially acceptable, and preferable ecologically in this area. Although much remains to be done, thus far the consensus among the various project participants is that this approach may be a good fit for the public forest of Canada. Key words: TRIAD, functional zoning, sustainable forest management, ecosystem management, natural disturbance based management, intensive forestry, mixed plantations, partial cuts, eco-efficiency, conservation, new forestry, green accounting

[1]  Christian Messier,et al.  The role of plantations in managing the world's forests in the Anthropocene , 2010 .

[2]  M. Fortin,et al.  Comparing different forest zoning options for landscape-scale management of the boreal forest: possible benefits of the TRIAD. , 2010 .

[3]  Klaus J. Puettmann,et al.  A Critique of Silviculture: Managing for Complexity , 2008 .

[4]  J. Innes,et al.  Integrating climate change into forest management in South-Central British Columbia: An assessment of landscape vulnerability and development of a climate-smart framework , 2008 .

[5]  Sandra Knapp,et al.  Command and control , 2008, Nature.

[6]  Axel Don,et al.  Exploring the functional significance of forest diversity: A new long-term experiment with temperate tree species (BIOTREE) , 2007 .

[7]  A. Park,et al.  Beautiful Plantations: can intensive silviculture help Canada to fulfill ecological and timber production objectives? , 2007 .

[8]  Andrew Fall,et al.  The Effects of Spatial Legacies following Shifting Management Practices and Fire on Boreal Forest Age Structure , 2007, Ecosystems.

[9]  S. Sarkar,et al.  Systematic conservation planning , 2000, Nature.

[10]  J. Travis,et al.  Facilitation in plant communities: the past, the present, and the future , 2007 .

[11]  Andrew Fall,et al.  Insight, part of a Special Feature on Crossing Scales and Disciplines to Achieve Forest Sustainability A Toolkit Modeling Approach for Sustainable Forest Management Planning: Achieving Balance between Science and Local Needs , 2007 .

[12]  C. Messier,et al.  Forest dynamics following spruce budworm outbreaks in the northern and southern mixedwoods of central Quebec , 2007 .

[13]  P. Balvanera,et al.  Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[14]  P. Erskine,et al.  Tree species diversity and ecosystem function: Can tropical multi-species plantations generate greater productivity? , 2006 .

[15]  J. Vanclay,et al.  Mixed-species plantations: Prospects and challenges , 2006 .

[16]  M. Kelty.  The role of species mixtures in plantation forestry , 2006 .

[17]  Matti Koivula,et al.  Reconciling Salvage Logging of Boreal Forests with a Natural‐Disturbance Management Model , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[18]  David A. MacLean,et al.  Triad forest management: Scenario analysis of forest zoning effects on timber and non-timber values in New Brunswick, Canada , 2006 .

[19]  S. Levin.  Self-organization and the Emergence of Complexity in Ecological Systems , 2005 .

[20]  C. S. Holling.  Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management , 2005 .

[21]  Fred L. Bunnell,et al.  Creating land allocation zones for forest management: a simulated annealing approach , 2004 .

[22]  M. Flannigan,et al.  Past, Current and Future Fire Frequency in the Canadian Boreal Forest: Implications for Sustainable Forest Management , 2004, Ambio.

[23]  D. Hebert,et al.  An ecological rationale for sustainable forest management concepts at Riverside Forest Products, southcentral British Columbia , 2004 .

[24]  Andrew Fall,et al.  Consequences of various landscape-scale ecosystem management strategies and fire cycles on age-class structure and harvest in boreal forests , 2004 .

[25]  I. Vertinsky,et al.  Modeling alternative zoning strategies in forest management , 2003 .

[26]  S. Pacala,et al.  Successional diversity and forest ecosystem function , 2001, Ecological Research.

[27]  D. Greene,et al.  A review of the regeneration dynamics of North American boreal forest tree species , 1999 .

[28]  J. Régnière,et al.  Spruce budworm impact, abundance and parasitism rate in a patchy landscape , 1998, Oecologia.

[29]  C. Binkley.  Preserving nature through intensive plantation forestry: The case for forestland allocation with illustrations from British Columbia , 1997 .

[30]  S. Craig Delong,et al.  Managing the pattern of forest harvest: lessons from wildfire , 1996, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[31]  C. Holling,et al.  Command and Control and the Pathology of Natural Resource Management , 1996 .

[32]  R. E. Grumbine.  What Is Ecosystem Management , 1994 .

[33]  I. Thompson,et al.  Integrated resource management in boreal forest ecosystems — impediments and solutions , 1993 .

[34]  Jan Bos,et al.  Zoning in Forest Management: a Quadratic Assignment Problem Solved by Simulated Annealing , 1993 .

[35]  H. Pulliam,et al.  Sources, Sinks, and Population Regulation , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[36]  Robert S. Seymour,et al.  Setting Conservation Targets for Managed Forest Landscapes: Allocation of conservation efforts over the landscape: the TRIAD approach , 2009 .

[37]  M. Villard,et al.  Setting Conservation Targets for Managed Forest Landscapes: Acknowledgements , 2009 .

[38]  Iulian Dragotescu.  Étude comparative des peuplements forestiers après feux et après coupes dans la forêt boréale mixte en Mauricie et au Témiscamingue , 2008 .

[39]  C. Messier,et al.  Simulating Light Availability under Different Hybrid Poplar Clones in a Mixed Intensive Plantation System , 2008, Forest Science.

[40]  Richard V. Solé,et al.  Self-Organization in Complex Ecosystems. , 2006 .

[41]  Roger A. Sedjo,et al.  The potential of high-yield plantation forestry for meeting timber needs , 2004, New Forests.

[42]  E. Prepas,et al.  The current state of boreal forestry and the drive for change. , 2003 .

[43]  C. Messier,et al.  Nature-based silviculture for sustaining a variety of boreal forest values. , 2003 .

[44]  C. Messier,et al.  Using fast-growing plantations to promote ecosystem protection in Canada , 2003 .

[45]  L. Trevisan,et al.  Adaptive management: progress and prospects for Canadian forests. , 2003 .

[46]  Timo Kuuluvainen,et al.  Natural variability of forests as a reference for restoring and managing biological diversity in boreal Fennoscandia , 2002 .

[47]  M. Hartley,et al.  Rationale and methods for conserving biodiversity in plantation forests , 2002 .

[48]  Malcolm L. Hunter,et al.  Maintaining Biodiversity in Forest Ecosystems: Contents , 1999 .

[49]  Robert S. Seymour,et al.  Maintaining Biodiversity in Forest Ecosystems: Principles of ecological forestry , 1999 .

[50]  Jerry F. Franklin,et al.  Creating a forestry for the 21st century : the science of ecosystem management , 1997 .

[51]  S. Schmidheiny.  Changing Course: A Global Business Perspective on Development and the Environment , 1992 .

[52]  Edoardo Greppi.  FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) , 1981 .