Positionality and Belonging: Analyzing an Informally Situated and Culturally Responsive Computer Science Program

In recent years, there has been increased attention on promoting access to computer science among all students. Our study seeks to address the underrepresentation of racially minoritized youth in computer science by offering a culturally responsive after-school coding club at a local public library that serves a racially and socioeconomically diverse community. We analyzed facilitator interviews and student focus groups using qualitative data analysis with a focus on facilitator positionality and culturally responsive frameworks. Findings suggest facilitator positionality helped establish affirming, near-peer relationships with participants and situated facilitators as advocates for expanding and diversifying computer science. Additionally, the culturally responsive frameworks helped students to feel a sense of belonging in both the informal learning environment and in the field of computer science.

[1]  Mimi Recker,et al.  Conjecture Mapping the Library: Iterative Refinements Toward Supporting Maker Learning Activities in Small Community Spaces , 2018 .

[2]  Gloria S. Vaquera,et al.  Factors Impacting Sense of Belonging at a Hispanic-Serving Institution , 2007 .

[3]  Nanette Veilleux,et al.  The role of belonging in engagement, retention and persistence in computer science (abstract only) , 2012, SIGCSE '12.

[4]  Gloria J. Ladson-Billings,et al.  Toward a Theory of Culturally Relevant Pedagogy , 1995 .

[5]  J. A. Hatch,et al.  Doing Qualitative Research in Education Settings , 2002 .

[6]  Django Paris.  Culturally Sustaining Pedagogy , 2012 .

[7]  Yasmin B. Kafai,et al.  Libraries as Emerging Spaces for Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning in Schools and Communities , 2017, CSCL.

[8]  S. Livingstone,et al.  The Class: Living and Learning in the Digital Age , 2016 .

[9]  M. J. Goldston,et al.  Teaching evolution: Narratives with a view from three southern biology teachers in the USA , 2009 .

[10]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1992 .

[11]  Mary Kay Thompson Tetreault,et al.  The feminist classroom , 1994 .

[12]  R. Bishop,et al.  Pathologizing Practices: The Impact of Deficit Thinking on Education , 2004 .

[13]  Sepi Hejazi Moghadam,et al.  Pre-College Computer Science Education: A Survey of the Field , 2018 .

[14]  Sarah L. Rodriguez,et al.  Developing the next generation of diverse computer scientists: the need for enhanced, intersectional computing identity theory , 2017, Comput. Sci. Educ..

[15]  M. Pollock,et al.  From Shallow to Deep: Toward a Thorough Cultural Analysis of School Achievement Patterns , 2008 .

[16]  K. Hastrup.  Writing ethnography: State of the art , 1992 .

[17]  C. Goodenow.  The psychological sense of school membership among adolescents: Scale development and educational correlates , 1993 .

[18]  Michèlle Friend,et al.  Middle school girls’ envisioned future in computing , 2015, Comput. Sci. Educ..

[19]  H. Milner,et al.  Race, Culture, and Researcher Positionality: Working Through Dangers Seen, Unseen, and Unforeseen , 2007 .

[20]  Joanna Goode,et al.  The digital identity divide: how technology knowledge impacts college students , 2010, New Media Soc..

[21]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[22]  S. Nieto.  Language, culture, and teaching : critical perspectives for a new century , 2002 .