Investigations into the Neural Basis of Structured Representations

Title of Dissertation: INVESTIGATIONS INTO THE NEURAL BASIS OF STRUCTURED REPRESENTATIONS Carol Susan Whitney, Doctor of Philosophy, 2004 Dissertation directed by: Professor Amy Weinberg Departments of Computer Science and Linguistics The problem of how the brain encodes structural representations is investigated via the formulation of computational theories constrained from the bottomup by neurobiological factors, and from the top-down by behavioral data. This approach is used to construct models of letter-position encoding in visual word recognition, and of hierarchical representations in sentence parsing. The problem of letter-position encoding entails the specification of how the retinotopic representation of a stimulus (a printed word) is progressively converted into an abstract representation of letter order. Consideration of the architecture of the visual system, letter perceptibility studies, and form-priming experiments led to the SERIOL model, which is comprised of five layers: (1) a (retinotopic) edge layer, in which letter activations are determined by the acuity gradient; (2) a (retinotopic) feature layer, in which letter activations conform to a monotonically decreasing activation gradient, dubbed the locational gradient; (3) an abstract letter layer, in which letter order is encoded sequentially. (4) a bigram layer, in which contextual units encode letter pairs that fire in a particular order; (5) a word layer. Because the acuity and locational gradients are congruent to each other in one hemisphere but not the other, formation of the locational gradient requires hemisphere-specific processing. It is proposed that this processing underlies visual-field asymmetries associated with word length and orthographic-neighborhood size. Hemifield lexical-decision experiments in which contrast manipulations were used to modify activation patterns confirmed this account. In contrast to the linear relationships between letters, a parse of a sentence requires hierarchical representations. Consideration of a fixed-connectivity constraint, brain imaging studies, sentence-complexity phenomena, and insights from the SERIOL model led to the TPARRSE model, in which hierarchical relationships are represented by a predefined distributed encoding. This encoding is constructed with the support of working memory, which encodes relationships between phrases via two synchronized sequential representations. The model explains complexity phenomena based on specific proposals as to how information is represented and manipulated in syntactic working memory. In contrast to capacity-based metrics, the TPARRSE model provides a more comprehensive account of these phenomena. INVESTIGATIONS INTO THE NEURAL BASIS OF STRUCTURED REPRESENTATIONS

[1]  Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al.  The Neuroscience of Language: On Brain Circuits of Words and Serial Order , 2003 .

[2]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The visual word form area: a prelexical representation of visual words in the fusiform gyrus , 2002, Neuroreport.

[3]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Frequency dependence of spike timing reliability in cortical pyramidal cells and interneurons. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  G. McConkie,et al.  What guides a reader's eye movements? , 1976, Vision Research.

[5]  Andrew W. Ellis,et al.  Word Length and Orthographic Neighborhood Size Effects in the Left and Right Cerebral Hemispheres , 2002, Brain and Language.

[6]  T. Nealey,et al.  Magnocellular and parvocellular contributions to responses in the middle temporal visual area (MT) of the macaque monkey , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[7]  T. Nazir,et al.  Reading habits, perceptual learning, and recognition of printed words , 2004, Brain and Language.

[8]  J. Melville,et al.  Word-length as a factor in differential recognition. , 1957, The American journal of psychology.

[9]  Jürgen Schmidhuber,et al.  Long Short-Term Memory , 1997, Neural Computation.

[10]  D. Foster,et al.  Recognizing novel three–dimensional objects by summing signals from parts and views , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[11]  Nick Chater,et al.  Connectionist natural language processing: the state of the art , 1999, Cogn. Sci..

[12]  T. Allison,et al.  Word recognition in the human inferior temporal lobe , 1994, Nature.

[13]  N Makris,et al.  Location of lesions in stroke patients with deficits in syntactic processing in sentence comprehension. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[14]  Michal Lavidor,et al.  Analysis of standard and non-standard visual word format in the two hemispheres , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  Dennis F. Fisher,et al.  Left-to-right processing of alphabetic material is independent of retinal location , 1978 .

[16]  D. Amaral,et al.  Dendritic morphology, local circuitry, and intrinsic electrophysiology of principal neurons in the entorhinal cortex of macaque monkeys , 2004, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[17]  Trichur Raman Vidyasagar Neural underpinnings of dyslexia as a disorder of visuo‐spatial attention , 2004, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[18]  Jeffrey L. Elman,et al.  Finding Structure in Time , 1990, Cogn. Sci..

[19]  W. Klimesch Memory processes, brain oscillations and EEG synchronization. , 1996, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[20]  C. Burgess,et al.  Cerebral hemispheric mechanisms in the retrieval of ambiguous word meanings , 1988, Brain and Language.

[21]  Derek Besner,et al.  Neighbourhood density, word frequency, and spelling-sound regularity effects in naming: similarities and differences between skilled readers and the Dual Route Cascaded Computational model. , 2004, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[22]  J. Binder,et al.  The topography of callosal reading pathways. A case-control analysis. , 1992, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[23]  M Lavidor,et al.  Evaluating a split processing model of visual word recognition: effects of word length. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[24]  George Wolford,et al.  Retinal location and string position as important variables in visual information processing , 1974 .

[25]  J. Frederiksen,et al.  Spelling and sound: Approaches to the internal lexicon. , 1976 .

[26]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  A Distributed Connectionist Production System , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[27]  D J Mewhort,et al.  Modeling lexical decision and word naming as a retrieval process. , 1999, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[28]  O. Jensen,et al.  Frontal theta activity in humans increases with memory load in a working memory task , 2002, The European journal of neuroscience.

[29]  M. Behrmann,et al.  Visual complexity in letter-by-letter reading: Pure alexia is not pure , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[30]  H. Renvall,et al.  Left minineglect in dyslexic adults. , 2001, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[31]  R. Horton Rules and representations , 1993, The Lancet.

[32]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Letter visibility and the viewing position effect in visual word recognition , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[33]  J. J. Hopfield,et al.  Pattern recognition computation using action potential timing for stimulus representation , 1995, Nature.

[34]  Janet McGraw Fisher,et al.  The role of motion direction selective extrastriate regions in reading: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study , 2003, Brain and Language.

[35]  Michal Lavidor,et al.  Why word length only matters in the left visual field , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[36]  R. Salmelin,et al.  Dissociation of normal feature analysis and deficient processing of letter-strings in dyslexic adults. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[37]  T. Bliss,et al.  Long‐lasting potentiation of synaptic transmission in the dentate area of the anaesthetized rabbit following stimulation of the perforant path , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[38]  B. Boycott,et al.  Cortical magnification factor and the ganglion cell density of the primate retina , 1989, Nature.

[39]  G Richard,et al.  Ultra-rapid categorisation of natural scenes does not rely on colour cues: a study in monkeys and humans , 2000, Vision Research.

[40]  W. Klimesch EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: a review and analysis , 1999, Brain Research Reviews.

[41]  Edith Kaan,et al.  Cross-serial dependencies in dutch: Testing the influence of NP type on processing load , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[42]  D C Van Essen,et al.  Functional properties of neurons in middle temporal visual area of the macaque monkey. I. Selectivity for stimulus direction, speed, and orientation. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[43]  E R Harcum,et al.  Serial Processing Shown by Mutual Masking of Icons , 1975, Perceptual and motor skills.

[44]  J. Grainger,et al.  Does the huamn mnid raed wrods as a wlohe? , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[45]  M. Molteni,et al.  The gradient of visual attention in developmental dyslexia , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[46]  J. Grainger,et al.  Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters , 2004 .

[47]  Z. Eviatar Cross-language tests of hemispheric strategies in reading nonwords. , 1999, Neuropsychology.

[48]  Svetlana Levitan,et al.  A Computational Model of Lateralization and Asymmetries in Cortical Maps , 2000, Neural Computation.

[49]  S. Andrews The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts , 1997 .

[50]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Interhemispheric transfer and the processing of foveally presented stimuli , 1994, Behavioural Brain Research.

[51]  P. Hagoort,et al.  Event-related theta power increases in the human EEG during online sentence processing , 2002, Neuroscience Letters.

[52]  A. Jacobs,et al.  On the role of competing word units in visual word recognition: The neighborhood frequency effect , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[53]  Philip T Quinlan,et al.  Orthographic processing in visual word identification , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.

[54]  H. Wimmer,et al.  Theta band power changes in normal and dyslexic children , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[55]  Paul D. Siakaluk,et al.  Orthographic neighborhood effects in lexical decision: the effects of nonword orthographic neighborhood size. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[56]  D. Green,et al.  Detecting targets in letter and non-letter arrays. , 1982, Canadian journal of psychology.

[57]  M Mason,et al.  Recognition time for letters and nonletters: effects of serial position, array size, and processing order. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[58]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  On Certain Formal Properties of Grammars , 1959, Inf. Control..

[59]  N. Friedmann,et al.  Letter Position Dyslexia , 2001, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[60]  Trichur Raman Vidyasagar From attentional gating in macaque primary visual cortex to dyslexia in humans. , 2001, Progress in brain research.

[61]  W. Singer,et al.  Temporal binding and the neural correlates of sensory awareness , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[62]  C. Whitney How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[63]  A. Young,et al.  Different methods of lexical access for words presented in the left and right visual hemifields , 1985, Brain and Language.

[64]  J. Magee Dendritic mechanisms of phase precession in hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[65]  C. Fiebach,et al.  fMRI Evidence for Dual Routes to the Mental Lexicon in Visual Word Recognition , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[66]  R. Shillcock,et al.  Evaluating a split processing model of visual word recognition: Effects of orthographic neighborhood size , 2004, Brain and Language.

[67]  Mark Johnson,et al.  Memory requirements and local ambiguities of parsing strategies , 1991 .

[68]  Stephen Grossberg,et al.  A massively parallel architecture for a self-organizing neural pattern recognition machine , 1988, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[69]  Richard L. Lewis Interference in short-term memory: The magical number two (or three) in sentence processing , 1996, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[70]  W. Hayward After the viewpoint debate: where next in object recognition? , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[71]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  Reexamining the word length effect in visual word recognition: New evidence from the English Lexicon Project , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[72]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: part 1.: an account of basic findings , 1988 .

[73]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Crossed and nested dependencies in German and Dutch , 1986 .

[74]  J. Victor,et al.  Nature and precision of temporal coding in visual cortex: a metric-space analysis. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[75]  Edward Gibson,et al.  Reading relative clauses in English , 2005 .

[76]  W. Fitch,et al.  Computational Constraints on Syntactic Processing in a Nonhuman Primate , 2004, Science.

[77]  E. Gibson Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies , 1998, Cognition.

[78]  Sharon M. Thomas,et al.  Assessing the Role of Hemispheric Specialisation, Serial-Position Processing, and Retinal Eccentricity in Lateralised Word RecognitioN , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[79]  K Rayner,et al.  Parafoveal identification during a fixation in reading. , 1975, Acta psychologica.

[80]  Joseph T Devlin,et al.  The myth of the visual word form area , 2003, NeuroImage.

[81]  W. Lovegrove,et al.  Weakness in the Transient Visual System: A Causal Factor in Dyslexia? , 1993, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[82]  Jordan B. Pollack,et al.  Recursive Distributed Representations , 1990, Artif. Intell..

[83]  Mitchell P. Marcus,et al.  A theory of syntactic recognition for natural language , 1979 .

[84]  Colin J. Davis,et al.  The self-organising lexical acquisition and recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition. , 2001 .

[85]  Tony A. Plate,et al.  Holographic reduced representations , 1995, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[86]  Is the optimal viewing position in reading influenced by familiarity of the letter string? , 2001, Brain and Cognition.

[87]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  The Right Visual Field Advantage and the Optimal Viewing Position Effect : On the Relation Between Foveal and Parafoveal Word Recognition , 1996 .

[88]  C Witton,et al.  Dynamic sensory sensitivity and children's word decoding skills. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[89]  S. Raghavachari,et al.  Gating of Human Theta Oscillations by a Working Memory Task , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[90]  Bruce D. McCandliss,et al.  The visual word form area: expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[91]  M. Molteni,et al.  Hemispheric, attentional, and processing speed factors in the treatment of developmental dyslexia , 2004, Brain and Cognition.

[92]  R S Berndt,et al.  A new model of letter string encoding: simulating right neglect dyslexia. , 1999, Progress in brain research.

[93]  Frank Rösler,et al.  EEG power and coherence analysis of visually presented nouns and verbs reveals left frontal processing differences , 2004, Neuroscience Letters.

[94]  John E. Hummel,et al.  Distributed representations of structure: A theory of analogical access and mapping. , 1997 .

[95]  Julie E. Boland,et al.  Chapter 13 The Role of Lexical Representations in Sentence Processing , 1991 .

[96]  B. Burle,et al.  High-speed memory scanning: a behavioral argument for a serial oscillatory model. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[97]  S. Lupker,et al.  Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions ☆ , 2004 .

[98]  Michal Lavidor,et al.  The nature of foveal representation , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[99]  J. Stein,et al.  To see but not to read; the magnocellular theory of dyslexia , 1997, Trends in Neurosciences.

[100]  F. Pulvermüller,et al.  Effects of word length and frequency on the human event-related potential , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[101]  Carol Whitney,et al.  An explanation of the length effect for rotated words , 2002, Cognitive Systems Research.

[102]  Tatjana A. Nazir,et al.  PURE ALEXIA AND THE VIEWING POSITION EFFECT IN PRINTED WORDS. , 1998, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[103]  Michal Lavidor,et al.  Case alternation and length effects in lateralized word recognition: Studies of English and Hebrew , 2002, Brain and Cognition.

[104]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Generalization with Componential Attractors: Word and Nonword Reading in an Attractor Network , 1993 .

[105]  D. J. K. Mewhort,et al.  On the transfer from iconic to short-term memory , 1969 .

[106]  I. Biederman Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.

[107]  J Grainger,et al.  Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: a multiple read-out model. , 1996, Psychological review.

[108]  G. Brindley,et al.  The sensations produced by electrical stimulation of the visual cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[109]  Jennifer S. Burt,et al.  Does a reading lexicon provide orthographic representations for spelling , 2002 .

[110]  Michal Lavidor,et al.  A Magnetic Stimulation Examination of Orthographic Neighborhood Effects in Visual Word Recognition , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[111]  G. Kempen,et al.  Syntactic structure assembly in human parsing: a computational model based on competitive inhibition and a lexicalist grammar , 2000, Cognition.

[112]  W. Estes,et al.  Serial position functions for letter identification at brief and extended exposure durations , 1976 .

[113]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  THE TIME-COURSE OF PROCESSING SYNTACTIC DEPENDENCIES: EVIDENCE FROM EYE MOVEMENTS DURING SPOKEN NARRATIVES , 2001 .

[114]  Michael J. Frank,et al.  Making Working Memory Work: A Computational Model of Learning in the Prefrontal Cortex and Basal Ganglia , 2006, Neural Computation.

[115]  R. Salmelin,et al.  Dynamics of letter string perception in the human occipitotemporal cortex. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[116]  W. Klimesch,et al.  The role of theta and alpha oscillations for language comprehension in the human electroencephalogram , 2001, Neuroscience Letters.

[117]  Steven Abney,et al.  A computational model of human parsing , 1989 .

[118]  J. Reggia,et al.  The callosal dilemma: Explaining diaschisis in the context of hemispheric rivalry via a neural network model , 2001, Neurological research.

[119]  Carol S. Whitney,et al.  Position-specific effects within the SERIOL framework of letter-position coding , 2001, Connect. Sci..

[120]  Maria Babyonyshev,et al.  The Complexity of Nested Structures in Japanese. , 1999 .

[121]  Michal Lavidor,et al.  Facilitative orthographic neighborhood effects: The SERIOL model account , 2005, Cognitive Psychology.

[122]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Mixed parvocellular and magnocellular geniculate signals in visual area V4 , 1992, Nature.

[123]  Conrad Perry,et al.  No more problems in Coltheart's neighborhood: resolving neighborhood conflicts in the lexical decision task , 1998, Cognition.

[124]  Andrew W. Ellis,et al.  Orthographic Neighborhood Effects in the Right but Not in the Left Cerebral Hemisphere , 2002, Brain and Language.

[125]  J Grainger,et al.  The role of letter identity and letter position in orthographic priming , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[126]  S Lehéricy,et al.  The visual word form area: spatial and temporal characterization of an initial stage of reading in normal subjects and posterior split-brain patients. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[127]  C. Whitney,et al.  Hemisphere-specific effects in word recognition do not require hemisphere-specific modes of access , 2004, Brain and Language.

[128]  Robert C. Berwick,et al.  The Grammatical Basis of Linguistic Performance: Language Use and Acquisition , 1986 .

[129]  Jürgen Schmidhuber,et al.  LSTM recurrent networks learn simple context-free and context-sensitive languages , 2001, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[130]  Andrew W. Ellis,et al.  Modes of word recognition in the left and right cerebral hemispheres , 1988, Brain and Language.

[131]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Letter position information and printed word perception: the relative-position priming constraint. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[132]  M. Steriade,et al.  Electrophysiological properties and input-output organization of callosal neurons in cat association cortex. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[133]  Quantitative and Qualitative Hemispheric Asymmetry for Processing Japanese Kana , 1999, Brain and Cognition.

[134]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  The anatomy of phonological and semantic processing in normal subjects. , 1992, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[135]  S Dehaene,et al.  Neural networks that learn temporal sequences by selection. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[136]  D. Mewhort,et al.  Evidence for sequential processing in visual word recognition. , 1999 .

[137]  L. Shastri,et al.  From simple associations to systematic reasoning: A connectionist representation of rules, variables and dynamic bindings using temporal synchrony , 1993, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[138]  Tatsuji Inouye,et al.  Die Sehstörungen bei Schußverletzungen der kortikalen Sehsphäre : nach Beobachtungen an Verwundeten der letzten japanischen Kriege , 1909 .

[139]  Heekuck Oh,et al.  Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition , 1993, Adv. Comput..

[140]  D. Cole Adler's Physiology of the Eye: Clinical Application , 1982 .

[141]  Z. Harris,et al.  Foundations of Language , 1940 .

[142]  Geoffrey E. Hinton Mapping Part-Whole Hierarchies into Connectionist Networks , 1990, Artif. Intell..

[143]  Michael J. Berry,et al.  The structure and precision of retinal spike trains. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[144]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  Reanalysis and Limited Repair Parsing: Leaping off the Garden Path , 1998 .

[145]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.

[146]  F. AbbottPhysics FIRING-RATE MODELS FOR NEURAL POPULATIONSL , 1991 .

[147]  Thad A Polk,et al.  Functional MRI evidence for an abstract, not perceptual, word-form area. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[148]  Manuel Perea,et al.  Transposed-Letter Confusability Effects in Masked Form Priming , 2003 .

[149]  Padraic Monaghan,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetries in the split-fovea model of semantic processing , 2004, Brain and Language.

[150]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Language-specific tuning of visual cortex? Functional properties of the Visual Word Form Area. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[151]  S. Andrews Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search? , 1989 .

[152]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  The importance of interhemispheric transfer for foveal vision: A factor that has been overlooked in theories of visual word recognition and object perception , 2004, Brain and Language.

[153]  S. Andrews Lexical Retrieval and Selection Processes: Effects of Transposed-Letter Confusability , 1996 .

[154]  Michael C. Mozer,et al.  Perception of multiple objects - a connectionist approach , 1991, Neural network modeling and connectionism.

[155]  G. Humphreys,et al.  The Use of Abstract Graphemic Information in Lexical Access , 1981 .

[156]  J E Lisman,et al.  Storage of 7 +/- 2 short-term memories in oscillatory subcycles , 1995, Science.

[157]  D. S. Buchanan Aphasia, Apraxia and Agnosia. , 1973 .

[158]  J. O'Regan,et al.  Convenient fixation location within isolated words of different length and structure. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[159]  William Bialek,et al.  Spikes: Exploring the Neural Code , 1996 .

[160]  E. Gibson,et al.  Memory Limitations and Structural Forgetting: The Perception of Complex Ungrammatical Sentences as Grammatical , 1999 .

[161]  Lokendra Shastri,et al.  Advances in SHRUTI—A Neurally Motivated Model of Relational Knowledge Representation and Rapid Inference Using Temporal Synchrony , 1999, Applied Intelligence.

[162]  Manuel Perea,et al.  Orthographic Neighbours are not all Equal: Evidence using an Identification Technique , 1998, Language and Cognitive Processes.

[163]  T Shallice,et al.  Word-form dyslexia. , 1980, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[164]  J B Poline,et al.  Letter Binding and Invariant Recognition of Masked Words , 2004, Psychological science.

[165]  D. Besner,et al.  Visual word recognition: a multistage activation model. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[166]  Gordon E Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading XX. Linking letter recognition to reading speed in central and peripheral vision , 2001, Vision Research.

[167]  A. Leff A historical review of the representation of the visual field in primary visual cortex with special reference to the neural mechanisms underlying macular sparing , 2004, Brain and Language.

[168]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  Syntactic and Positional Similarity Effects in the Processing of Japanese Embeddings , 2002 .

[169]  H. Bouma Visual interference in the parafoveal recognition of initial and final letters of words. , 1973, Vision research.

[170]  R A Abrams,et al.  Mental chronometry: beyond onset latencies in the lexical decision task. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[171]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  How Initial Fixation Position Influences Visual Word Recognition: A Comparison of French and Arabic , 1996, Brain and Language.

[172]  Manfred MacKeben,et al.  Eye movement control during single-word reading in dyslexics. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[173]  J. Norman,et al.  Reading rotated words. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[174]  Tessa C. Warren,et al.  The influence of referential processing on sentence complexity , 2002, Cognition.

[175]  David C. Plaut,et al.  A connectionist model of sentence comprehension and production , 2002 .

[176]  Rodrigo Andrade,et al.  Cell excitation enhances muscarinic cholinergic responses in rat association cortex , 1991, Brain Research.

[177]  J. Pynte,et al.  The optimal viewing position effect in beginning and dyslexic readers , 2003 .

[178]  P. Cornelissen,et al.  Coherent motion detection and letter position encoding , 1998, Vision Research.

[179]  Joseph B. Hellige,et al.  Effects of Output Order on Hemispheric Asymmetry for Processing Letter Trigrams , 1997, Brain and Language.

[180]  T. Nazir On hemispheric specialisation and visual field effects in the perception of print: A comment on Jordan, Patching, and Thomas , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[181]  S. Thorpe,et al.  Surfing a spike wave down the ventral stream , 2002, Vision Research.

[182]  E R Harcum,et al.  Evidence from Mutual Masking for Serial Processing of Tachistoscopic Letter Patterns , 1976, Perceptual and motor skills.

[183]  Steven Abney,et al.  Chunks and Dependencies: Bringing Processing Evidence to Bear on Syntax , 2002 .

[184]  Recognition of CVC Syllables from LVF, RVF, and Central Locations: Hemispheric Differences and Interhemispheric Interaction , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[185]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Visual word recognition in the left and right hemispheres: anatomical and functional correlates of peripheral alexias. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[186]  a.R.V.,et al.  Clinical neurophysiology , 1961, Neurology.

[187]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Letter-position coding in random consonant arrays , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[188]  James Henderson,et al.  Incremental Syntactic Parsing of Natural Language Corpora with Simple Synchrony Networks , 2001, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..

[189]  Kunihiko Fukushima,et al.  Neocognitron: A hierarchical neural network capable of visual pattern recognition , 1988, Neural Networks.

[190]  T. Poggio,et al.  A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects , 1990, Nature.