Beaked and Baleen Whale Hearing: Modeling Responses to Underwater Noise

Abstract : Ultimately this research is to provide proof of concept for using modeling techniques to provide reliable hearing estimates for species thought to be most liable to impacts from oceanic sound sources. To address this, preliminary data were acquired that may later be applied toward calculating a model audiogram of large whale hearing that demonstrates the ability to accurately estimate hearing ranges and peak sensitivities using current anatomical and biomedical engineering techniques. The model proposed is to be created from neuroanatomical data combined with direct measures of middle and inner ear stiffness. For now, preliminary data have been collected, with anatomical measures obtained for the heads and inner ears of two beaked and two minke whales, as well as for 10 ears from these and additional animals. A partial frequency range map for the minke has been completed via CT and histologic data. Specimens have been used to redesign a piezo electric system to accommodate baleen ears, and point stiffness measures have been accomplished for the middle ears of some of the test minke specimens. These data have been compared with earlier results from multiple odontocete and land mammal ears.

[1]  D. Ketten Marine mammal auditory systems : a summary of audiometric and anatomical data and its implications for underwater acoustic impacts , 1998 .

[2]  R. Schusterman,et al.  Underwater temporary threshold shift induced by octave-band noise in three species of pinniped. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  James H. Botsford Theory of Temporary Threshold Shift , 1971 .

[4]  G. Wang,et al.  In vivo measures of cochlear length and insertion depth of nucleus cochlear implant electrode arrays. , 1998, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[5]  G. Fleischer Hearing in extinct cetaceans as determined by cochlear structure , 1976 .

[6]  D. Mountain,et al.  In vivo measurement of basilar membrane stiffness. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  David C Mountain,et al.  Basilar membrane tension calculations for the gerbil cochlea. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  D. Ketten,et al.  COCHLEAR COILING AND LOW-FREQUENCY HEARING , 2006 .

[9]  D. Mountain,et al.  Middle-ear stiffness of the bottlenose dolphin tursiops truncatus , 2006, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[10]  J. S. Keeler Compatible exposure and recovery functions for temporary threshold shift—Mechanical and electrical models , 1968 .

[11]  D. Mountain,et al.  Mapping the cochlear partition's stiffness to its cellular architecture. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  R. Patuzzi,et al.  Exponential onset and recovery of temporary threshold shift after loud sound: evidence for long-term inactivation of mechano-electrical transduction channels , 1998, Hearing Research.

[13]  D. Ketten,et al.  Topographical distribution of lipids inside the mandibular fat bodies of odontocetes: remarkable complexity and consistency , 2006, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[14]  E G Wever,et al.  Sound conduction in the dolphin ear. , 1970, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  J. Saunders,et al.  Auditory structure and function in the mouse middle ear: An evaluation by SEM and capacitive probe , 1982, Journal of comparative physiology.

[16]  D. Mountain,et al.  THE HELICOTREMA: MEASUREMENTS AND MODELS , 2003 .

[17]  J. Allen,et al.  A parametric study of cochlear input impedance. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  David C Mountain,et al.  Measurements of the stiffness map challenge a basic tenet of cochlear theories , 1998, Hearing Research.

[19]  W.A. Kalender,et al.  Unwrapping cochlear implants by spiral CT , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  C. E. Schlundt,et al.  Auditory and behavioral responses of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) and a beluga whale (Delphinapterus leucas) to impulsive sounds resembling distant signatures of underwater explosions. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  Daphne Manoussaki,et al.  The influence of cochlear shape on low-frequency hearing , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  B. M. Johnstone,et al.  Frequency Response of Bat Tympanic Membrane , 1972, Nature.

[23]  Richard R. Fay,et al.  Structure and Function in Sound Discrimination Among Vertebrates , 1992 .

[24]  W. T. Peake,et al.  Experiments in Hearing , 1963 .

[25]  PREDICTING CETACEAN AUDIOGRAMS , 2008 .

[26]  John J. Rosowski,et al.  Outer and Middle Ears , 1994 .

[27]  Longitudinal Coupling in the Basilar Membrane , 2001, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[28]  R. Patuzzi A four-state kinetic model of the temporary threshold shift after loud sound based on inactivation of hair cell transduction channels , 1998, Hearing Research.

[29]  D. Ketten The role of temporal bone imaging in cochlear implants , 1994 .