Heel pad stiffness in runners with plantar heel pain.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate significant differences in heel pad stiffness within a cohort of runners with diagnosed plantar heel pain and to explore the clinical importance of maximum heel pad stiffness values. DESIGN A cross-sectional design was used to quantify the heel pad stiffness of 166 runners with 33 diagnosed with plantar heel pain. BACKGROUND Palpation is still widely used to evaluate heel pad stiffness subjectively in everyday clinical practice. However, there is limited quantifiable data pertaining to heel pad stiffness measurements in runners and those with heel pain. METHODS A portable hand-held device measured force applied by a metal probe, and its displacement into the plantar surface of the heel pad. Non-linear modelling allowed curve coefficients b0 and b1 to be evaluated and was described by an exponential function using a non-linear regression equation. Exploratory analysis was used to describe a single-point approximation for clinical use. RESULTS An independent t-test demonstrated a statistically significant difference between the curve coefficient b1 (p<0.05). No significant difference was found for coefficient b0 between the plantar heel pain group and the non-plantar heel pain group (p>0.05). Exploratory analysis demonstrated maximum mean stiffness of 3.22 N/mm for the non-plantar heel pain group and 2.87 N/mm for the plantar heel pain-group, an 11% mean difference. CONCLUSION The results suggested that heel pad stiffness may be associated with plantar heel pain subjects. RELEVANCE Heel pad stiffness measurements may give a better insight into the mechanical properties of the heel pad in subjects with plantar heel pain.

[1]  M. Jahss,et al.  Investigations into the Fat Pads of the Sole of the Foot: Anatomy and Histology , 1992, Foot & ankle.

[2]  M. A. Harkness,et al.  Ultrasound Diagnosis of Plantar Fasciitis , 1993, Foot & ankle.

[3]  P. Aerts,et al.  The mechanical characteristics of the human heel pad during foot strike in running: an in vivo cineradiographic study. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Plantar soft tissue thickness during ground contact in walking. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  R. F. Ker,et al.  Fatigue quality of mammalian tendons. , 2000, The Journal of experimental biology.

[6]  K. Rome,et al.  Development of a clinical instrument to measure heel pad indentation. , 2000, Clinical biomechanics.

[7]  M. Maitland,et al.  Towards the quantification of end-feel for the assessment of passive joint motion , 1997 .

[8]  R. F. Ker,et al.  Foot Strike and the Properties of the Human Heel Pad , 1989, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[9]  John L. Ricci,et al.  Histology and Histomorphometric Analysis of the Normal and Atrophic Heel Fat Pad , 1995, Foot & ankle international.

[10]  R. F. Ker,et al.  The mechanical properties of the human subcalcaneal fat pad in compression. , 1990, Journal of anatomy.

[11]  R. F. Ker,et al.  The time-dependent mechanical properties of the human heel pad in the context of locomotion. , 1996, The Journal of experimental biology.

[12]  R. F. Ker,et al.  The effects of isolation on the mechanics of the human heel pad. , 1996, Journal of anatomy.

[13]  F. Tang,et al.  Comparison of the mechanical properties of the heel pad between young and elderly adults. , 1998, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[14]  W. Herzog,et al.  A new technique of tissue stiffness (compliance) assessment: its reliability, accuracy and comparison with an existing method. , 1996, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[15]  W. Kibler,et al.  Functional biomechanical deficits in running athletes with plantar fasciitis , 1991, The American journal of sports medicine.