TRADEOFFS IN PERFORMANCE ON DIFFERENT HOSTS: EVIDENCE FROM WITHIN‐ AND BETWEEN‐SITE VARIATION IN THE BEETLE DELOYALA GUTTATA

Host races of phytophagous insects are sympatric populations that have different host preferences and between which gene flow is restricted because of the difference in host preference. Sympatric, host-associated sibling species are sympatric populations that use different host plants and that do not interbreed because of the presence of isolating mechanisms not related to host preference (Jaenike, 1981; see Mayr, 1970, and Bush, 1969, for slightly different definitions of these terms). Although the existence of host races and host-associated sibling species of phytophagous insects has been suspected for over 50 years (e.g., Thorpe, 1930), the evolutionary mechanism of host race formation remains controversial. In particular, there is disagreement about the importance of sympatric divergence in generating host races and species. White (1978) has argued that sympatric speciation must be invoked to explain, in part, the great diversity of specialized herbivorous insects, while Bush (1974, 1975) has forcefully advocated the operation of sympatric divergence in the creation of sympatric host races of tephritid flies. By contrast, Futuyma and Mayer (1980; see also Futuyma, 1983a) have argued that there is no reliable experimental evidence to support these claims and that models of sympatric speciation are based on assumptions that are probably not met by most phytophagous insects. Several authors have developed formal models of sympatric divergence and speciation (Maynard Smith, 1966; Dickinson and Antonovics, 1973; Caisse and Antonovics, 1978; Pimm, 1979; Felsenstein, 1981). Although these models do not account for the evolution of differences in host plant preference associated with purported sympatric speciation in phytophagous insects, Bush and Diehl (1983) and Rausher (1984) have suggested how modification of these models could remedy this problem. A common assumption of all these models is that fitness on one host is negatively correlated with fitness on a second. This type of negative correlation is manifested in these models in the assumption that genetic variation exists at loci that exhibit a "crossing" genotype x host plant interaction, i.e., at loci at which some genotypes have high fitness on one host but low fitness on a second host while other genotypes have low fitness on the first but high fitness on the second host. This negative correlation seems to be necessary for sympatric speciation because it permits linkage disequilibrium to be established between loci influencing, say, viability on different hosts and loci influencing host preference. The resulting coadapted preference-viability gene complexes represent incipient host races or species. Moreover, the breakdown of these coadapted gene complexes by recombination provides the selection pressure that improves reproductive isolation, whether isolation is achieved via mating on the host (e.g., Bush, 1974, 1975) or by a separate assortative mating locus in linkage disequilibrium with loci affecting preference and fitness (e.g., Felsenstein, 1981). Without a crossing interaction, one homozygote genotype would have maximal fitness on both host species. Consequently, unless reproductive isolation were achieved instantaneously by a mutation

[1]  M. Rausher THE EVOLUTION OF HABITAT PREFERENCE IN SUBDIVIDED POPULATIONS , 1984, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[2]  M. Rausher Conditioning and genetic variation as causes of individual variation in the oviposition behaviour of the tortoise beetle, Deloyala guttata , 1983, Animal Behaviour.

[3]  B. Tabashnik HOST RANGE EVOLUTION: THE SHIFT FROM NATIVE LEGUME HOSTS TO ALFALFA BY THE BUTTERFLY, COLIAS PHILODICE ERIPHYLE , 1983, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[4]  M. Rausher CHAPTER 7 – Ecology of Host-Selection Behavior in Phytophagous Insects , 1983 .

[5]  D. Futuyma 8 – Selective Factors in the Evolution of Host Choice by Phytophagous Insects* , 1983 .

[6]  J. M. Scriber,et al.  CHAPTER 11 – Evolution of Feeding Specialization, Physiological Efficiency, and Host Races in Selected Papilionidae and Saturniidae , 1983 .

[7]  M. Rausher POPULATION DIFFERENTIATION IN EUPHYDRYAS EDITHA BUTTERFLIES: LARVAL ADAPTATION TO DIFFERENT HOSTS , 1982, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[8]  J. Bull,et al.  HERITABILITY OF SEX RATIO IN TURTLES WITH ENVIRONMENTAL SEX DETERMINATION , 1982, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[9]  D. Futuyma,et al.  FOOD PLANT SPECIALIZATION AND FEEDING EFFICIENCY IN THE TENT CATERPILLARS MALACOSOMA DISSTRIA AND M. AMERICANUM , 1981 .

[10]  J. Jaenike Criteria for Ascertaining the Existence of Host Races , 1981, The American Naturalist.

[11]  S. J. Arnold BEHAVIORAL VARIATION IN NATURAL POPULATIONS. I. PHENOTYPIC, GENETIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL CORRELATIONS BETWEEN CHEMORECEPTIVE RESPONSES TO PREY IN THE GARTER SNAKE, THAMNOPHIS ELEGANS , 1981, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[12]  P. A. Morrow,et al.  Specialization: species property or local phenomenon? , 1981, Science.

[13]  D. Strong,et al.  Nutritional Ecology of Heliconia Herbivores: Experiments with Plant Fertilization and Alternative Hosts , 1981 .

[14]  J. Felsenstein SKEPTICISM TOWARDS SANTA ROSALIA, OR WHY ARE THERE SO FEW KINDS OF ANIMALS? , 1981, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[15]  D. Futuyma,et al.  Non-Allopatric Speciation in Animals , 1980 .

[16]  F. Gould RAPID HOST RANGE EVOLUTION IN A POPULATION OF THE PHYTOPHAGOUS MITE TETRANYCHUS URTICAE KOCH , 1979, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[17]  J. M. Scriber,et al.  Growth of Herbivorous Caterpillars in Relation to Feeding Specialization and to the Growth Form of Their Food Plants , 1979 .

[18]  S. Pimm Sympatric speciation: a simulation model , 1979 .

[19]  R. Lande QUANTITATIVE GENETIC ANALYSIS OF MULTIVARIATE EVOLUTION, APPLIED TO BRAIN:BODY SIZE ALLOMETRY , 1979, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[20]  J. Smiley Plant Chemistry and the Evolution of Host Specificity: New Evidence from Heliconius and Passiflora , 1978, Science.

[21]  G. Duncan,et al.  Multivariate Analysis: With Applications in Education and Psychology. , 1977 .

[22]  L. Schroeder Energy, matter and nitrogen utilization by larvae of the milkweed tiger moth Euchaetias egle , 1977 .

[23]  P. Holland,et al.  Discrete Multivariate Analysis. , 1976 .

[24]  A. J. Barr,et al.  A user's guide to SAS 76 , 1976 .

[25]  L. Schroeder Energy, matter and nitrogen utilization by the larvae of the monarch butterfly Danaus plexippus , 1976 .

[26]  J. Antonovics THE NATURE OF LIMITS TO NATURAL SELECTION , 1976 .

[27]  H. L. Gray,et al.  The Generalized Jackknife Statistic , 1975 .

[28]  H. Nijhout A threshold size for metamorphosis in the tobacco hornworm, Manduca sexta (L.). , 1975, The Biological bulletin.

[29]  M. Feldman,et al.  Subdivided populations: a review of the one- and two-locus deterministic theory. , 1975, Theoretical population biology.

[30]  G. Bush Sympatric Speciation in Phytophagous Parasitic Insects , 1975 .

[31]  H. Nijhout,et al.  Control of moulting and metamorphosis in the tobacco hornworm, Manduca sexta (L.): growth of the last-instar larva and the decision to pupate. , 1974, The Journal of experimental biology.

[32]  Janis Antonovics,et al.  Theoretical Considerations of Sympatric Divergence , 1973, The American Naturalist.

[33]  W. Modell Population, Species and Evolution , 1971 .

[34]  M. Kimura,et al.  An introduction to population genetics theory , 1971 .

[35]  Stephen E. Fienberg,et al.  The Analysis of Multidimensional Contingency Tables , 1970 .

[36]  F. Engelmann The physiology of insect reproduction , 1970 .

[37]  G. Bush SYMPATRIC HOST RACE FORMATION AND SPECIATION IN FRUGIVOROUS FLIES OF THE GENUS RHAGOLETIS (DIPTERA, TEPHRITIDAE) , 1969, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[38]  G. Waldbauer The Consumption and Utilization of Food by Insects , 1968 .

[39]  S. Gould ALLOMETRY AND SIZE IN ONTOGENY AND PHYLOGENY , 1966, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[40]  A. Bradshaw,et al.  Evolution in closely adjacent plant populations , 1963 .

[41]  R. F. Morris The Dynamics of Epidemic Spruce Budworm Populations , 1963 .

[42]  Yukio Yamada Genotype by Environment Interaction and Genetic Correlation of the same Trait under Different Environments , 1962 .

[43]  A. Robertson THE SAMPLING VARIANCE OF THE GENETIC CORRELATION COEFFICIENT , 1959 .

[44]  J. Maynard Smith,et al.  The genetic basis of selection. , 1959 .

[45]  D. Falconer The Problem of Environment and Selection , 1952, The American Naturalist.

[46]  W. Thorpe BIOLOGICAL RACES IN INSECTS AND ALLIED GROUPS , 1930 .