Detectability limits for a dual head coincidence imaging system
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] K. Murthy,et al. Quantification in positron emission mammography (PEM) with planar detectors: contrast resolution measurements using a custom breast phantom and novel spherical hot-spots , 1998, 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record. 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.98CH36255).
[2] E. Hoffman,et al. Performance standards in positron emission tomography. , 1991, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[3] P E Kinahan,et al. Positron emission tomography with a large axial acceptance angle: signal-to-noise considerations. , 1991, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.
[4] Joel S. Karp,et al. Positron Emission Tomography With A Large Axial Acceptance Angle: Signal-to-noise Considerations , 1990, 1990 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.
[5] K Doi,et al. A comparison of physical image quality indices and observer performance in the radiographic detection of nylon beads. , 1984, Physics in medicine and biology.
[6] R J Jaszczak,et al. LESION DETECTION WITH SINGLE‐PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY (SPECT) COMPARED WITH CONVENTIONAL IMAGING , 1982, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[7] K. Hanson,et al. Detectability in computed tomographic images. , 1979, Medical physics.