Detectability limits for a dual head coincidence imaging system

Phantom studies were performed to investigate detection limits for a dual head coincidence imaging system. Detection is defined as: D=contrast/noise (CNR)=(-)//spl sigma//sub back/ Where and are average pixel values for sphere and background regions of interest (ROIs), respectively, and /spl sigma//sub back/ is the standard deviation of the counts in background regions of the same size as the ROI used for the sphere. Spheres of 2.8, 2.2, 1.6, 1.2, 1.0, 0.8 cm inner diameter were placed at a radius of 5.75 cm in a 22 cm diameter cylindrical phantom. Contrast to noise values were determined for three different sphere to background ratios (10:1, 5:1, and 3:1); for three different background count densities (high, medium, and low), and for three different energy window requirements (photopeak only, photopeak-Compton, and all combinations). Based upon the authors' visual observation, the smallest detectable spheres were 0.8 cm, 1.2 cm and 1.6 cm for a 2.7 million event image set with sphere to background ratios of 10:1, 5:1 and 3:1, respectively.

[1]  K. Murthy,et al.  Quantification in positron emission mammography (PEM) with planar detectors: contrast resolution measurements using a custom breast phantom and novel spherical hot-spots , 1998, 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record. 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.98CH36255).

[2]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Performance standards in positron emission tomography. , 1991, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[3]  P E Kinahan,et al.  Positron emission tomography with a large axial acceptance angle: signal-to-noise considerations. , 1991, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[4]  Joel S. Karp,et al.  Positron Emission Tomography With A Large Axial Acceptance Angle: Signal-to-noise Considerations , 1990, 1990 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[5]  K Doi,et al.  A comparison of physical image quality indices and observer performance in the radiographic detection of nylon beads. , 1984, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  R J Jaszczak,et al.  LESION DETECTION WITH SINGLE‐PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY (SPECT) COMPARED WITH CONVENTIONAL IMAGING , 1982, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[7]  K. Hanson,et al.  Detectability in computed tomographic images. , 1979, Medical physics.