Enhanced dynamic range x-ray imaging

X-ray images can suffer from excess contrast. Often, image exposure is chosen to visually optimize the region of interest, but at the expense of over- and underexposed regions elsewhere in the image. When image values are interpreted quantitatively as projected absorption, both over- and underexposure leads to the loss of quantitative information. We propose to combine multiple exposures into a composite that uses only pixels from those exposures in which they are neither under- nor overexposed. The composite image is created in analogy to visible-light high dynamic range photography. We present the mathematical framework for the recovery of absorbance from such composite images and demonstrate the method with biological and non-biological samples. We also show with an aluminum step-wedge that accurate recovery of step thickness from the absorbance values is possible, thereby highlighting the quantitative nature of the presented method. Due to the higher amount of detail encoded in an enhanced dynamic range x-ray image, we expect that the number of retaken images can be reduced, and patient exposure overall reduced. We also envision that the method can improve dual energy absorptiometry and even computed tomography by reducing the number of low-exposure ("photon-starved") projections.

[1]  William Ching,et al.  Patient-based radiographic exposure factor selection: a systematic review , 2014, Journal of medical radiation sciences.

[2]  Xiaochuan Pan,et al.  Dual-Energy Technique at Low Tube Voltages for Small Animal Imaging. , 2010, Tsinghua science and technology.

[3]  Jessica K. Hodgins,et al.  Two methods for display of high contrast images , 1999, TOGS.

[4]  Xiaochuan Pan,et al.  A robust method of x-ray source spectrum estimation from transmission measurements: Demonstrated on computer simulated, scatter-free transmission data , 2005 .

[5]  Mark A. Haidekker,et al.  Advanced Biomedical Image Analysis , 2010 .

[6]  G. Sumner-Smith,et al.  Blood supply and osteogenesis , 2006, Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology.

[7]  A. Momose Phase-sensitive imaging and phase tomography using X-ray interferometers. , 2003, Optics express.

[8]  Polad M Shikhaliev The upper limits of the SNR in radiography and CT with polyenergetic x-rays. , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  Franz Pfeiffer,et al.  Grating-based X-ray phase contrast for biomedical imaging applications. , 2013, Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik.

[10]  Erik Reinhard,et al.  High Dynamic Range Imaging: Acquisition, Display, and Image-Based Lighting (The Morgan Kaufmann Series in Computer Graphics) , 2005 .

[11]  J. H. Hubbell,et al.  Tables of X-Ray Mass Attenuation Coefficients and Mass Energy-Absorption Coefficients 1 keV to 20 MeV for Elements Z = 1 to 92 and 48 Additional Substances of Dosimetric Interest , 1995 .

[12]  Arthur Burgess On the noise variance of a digital mammography system. , 2004, Medical physics.

[13]  B.S. Lee,et al.  Development of a portable digital radiographic system based on FOP-coupled CMOS image sensor and its performance evaluation , 2004, IEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004..

[14]  Kate Devlin,et al.  A review of tone reproduction techniques , 2002 .

[15]  C. Vogel Computational Methods for Inverse Problems , 1987 .

[16]  G. Margaritondo,et al.  Phase contrast X-ray imaging , 2006 .

[17]  J. Boone,et al.  Comprar Essential Physics Of Medical Imaging, International Edition | Jerrold T. Bushberg | 9781451118100 | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins , 2012 .

[18]  Erik Reinhard,et al.  High Dynamic Range Imaging: Acquisition, Display, and Image-Based Lighting , 2010 .

[19]  P F van der Stelt,et al.  The dynamic range of digital radiographic systems: dose reduction or risk of overexposure? , 2004, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[20]  R. Kirberger,et al.  Radiograph quality evaluation for exposure variables--a review. , 1999, Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association.